Compilation of U.S. and Indian Court Documents and Legal Correspondence Regarding Disputes Involving Sri Nithyananda Paramashivam and Related Entities

=== Page 1 === US Court documents exonerating The SPH Nithyananda Paramashivam

Letter from U.S. Lawyer Mr Aviv Tuchman with U.S. Orders & Rulings Exonerating The SPH: Mr. Tuchman's legal brief provides a detailed summary of key court cases, covering a span of 4 years, across three U.S. States (California, Michigan & Washington) and cites to clinching evidence and court orders exonerating The SPH

LINK TO LETTER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/01 .- Aviv 11.13.14-ltr.pdf

Thereafter, and over the course of the entire action, Mr. Bharadwaj engaged in a well- documented and continuous pattern of obstructive, dilatory tactics and misuse of discovery, for which he was sanctioned by the court. He repeatedly and deliberately failed and refused to respond to discovery and participate in his own action and violated multiple court orders, including to submit to his deposition and mental examination. This conduct evidenced to both the parties and the court that his allegations were unfounded and were brought maliciously and for an ulterior and improper purpose. On July 31, 2012, Mr. Bharadwaj's criminal trial commenced in Washington. Mr. Bharadwaj waived a jury trial. At the time of the trial, he faced three Felony Counts of Child Molestation in the Second Degree and one Gross Misdemeanor Count of Communication with a Minor for Immoral Purposes. His criminal defense was that the Defendants conspired with the minor and her family to make false allegations of child molestation against him to the police. During the trial, Mr. Bharadwaj took the stand to testify in his defense. Not once during his hours of testimony did he deny any of the charges or allegations against him. On August 14, 2012, he was convicted on all counts. In finding Mr. Bharadwaj guilty on all counts of molesting the minor, the trial court unequivocally concluded and opined that Mr. Bharadwaj's conspiracy defense relating to Sri Nithyananda Swami and other defendants to be baseless, not credible, and lacking in evidence to support such a claim. Mr. Bharadwaj was immediately taken into custody. On September 21, 2012, he was sentenced to 57 months imprisonment, where he is currently serving out his sentence. He faces immediate deportation upon his release from jail.

=== Page 2 === 2013 California (USA) Court Ruling in Favor of The SPH, and Fined False Victim nearly Half a million dollars After 2 years of disobeying court orders and committing perjury, the false victim was fined nearly half a million dollars and his false case against The SPH was dismissed by the California (U.S.A) Court.

LINK TO ORDER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/C .- US-Win-Vinay-Bharadwaj-Fined-nea rly-Half-Million.pdf

=== Page 3 === mailling (plus an additional calendar day since the ceiginal date fell on a Sunday). Accordingly, service was proper and timely, and Plaintiff was given well-beyond the minimum statutory notice required for the hearing date. Moreover, on February 27, 2013, the Court continued the hearing date for the Motion to March 25, 2013, giving Plaintiff even more time to respond and file an opposition. However, no opposition was filled or served by Plaintiff. 7 14. The Motion came for hearing on March 25, 2013. At that hearing, Mr. Bharadwaj appeared by telephone and represented to this Court that he did not receive the Motion 9 until March 9, 2013 because he moved from the Washington Corrections Center to the 10 Stafford Creek Corrections Center. However, on March 22, 2013, Defendants filed a 11 Declaration of Mark Dragoo, the mailroom employee at the Stafford Creek Corrections 12 Center who actually processed the Motion and had it delivered to Mr. Bharadwaj. Mr. 13 Dragoo verified that the Motion was processed on February 15, 2013 and delivered to 14 Mr. Bharadwaj on February 16, 2013. The Court denied Plaimtiff's oral request to 15 continue the Motion but, on the Court's own motion, nonetheless continued the hearing 16 to April 4, 2013. Despite the continuance, Plaintiff still failed to file an opposition. 17 15. Based thercon, Plaintiff was timely served and given sufficient notice of this Motion. 18 He has had more than enough time to respond and file an opposition, but failed to do 19 so. Moreover, no reasonable explanation or excuse justifying Plaintiff's delay and 20 failure to file an opposition to the Motion has been peovided. THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the Motion for Attomey's Fees is GRANTED, and Defendants Nityananda Foundation and Life Bliss Foundation are awarded their reasonable attorney's fees as costs against Plaintiff Vinay Bharadwaj in the total amount of $390.491.50 24 25 n. Judge Keith D. Davis

In 2017, Indian Court (Mysore, Karnataka) Upholds US Half Million Judgment Against False Victim The false victim was not only fined a half million judgment in the US, but the Indian courts also upheld the same judgment after independent adjudication of the same facts. See fill judgement: https://drive.google.com/file/d/185V52oull -rxS6qx6Gi0sdtlBtqIfX-/view?usp=share link

=== Page 4 === TETLE SHEET IN GUOGENAL SUITS N THE COURT OF THE PRZINCIZAL. SENIO CIVI JUDGE& C.L.M .. AT MYSURE

PHESENT : SHE.N Sobramanys, M.Cam., LLB., Pvt. Sr.Clvil Judge & Cua. Mysur

Duted this the 10" day af Oeteber 9037

1. Nirbyanarsda Pouratailon

Calemta-91763 Unieet Sules Amertea dpresenlest by its Dieeeter Ma Bhyn Atchalanandu, Aint sbent 29 years Dyo an. P. Annbamyan

etef at Na 9720 Cenind Asenue Caltamt-93769 Repomseuted by ls trector Agpt about 32 yeurs,

y Set. P.T.P .. Afvoratel

=== Page 5 === with the contentions taken by the plaintiff-foundation in the course ef the plaint. Therefore in view of the above diseussinn and rrasonings, 1 am of the opinion that the plalnllff-foundation i entilled for recovery of money with interest from the defendant as claimed in the peesent sull. 19. So far as the rate of interest is concemed, the plaintil elaimed Interest at the rate of 18 % p.a. en the suit elatm amount of Rs. 2.74,04,447.50/- Therefore this court is of the epinion that the rale of interest elaimed by the plainhff-feemdation en tbe suớt elaim amount is not reasonable. Hence this court of the opinicn that it is just and proper to award interest at the rate of % p.a. on the snil elsim amount from the defendant. Accordingly T answer Polnt Nos. 1 and 2 in the 'Afirmatiee", 20. Polnt No. A In view of my findings on point Nos. 1 and 2. I proceed to pass the felfewing :

The present sult flled by the plaineifs Foundation againat the defendant Jor recowery of moncy with interest is hereby decreed with costs. Accordingly, it is held that the dejendant lable to pay totally a sum of Rs.2.74,54,447.50f with interest at tha rate of 9% p.a. on suit claim amount Jrom the date of the suit till reatizatian

=== Page 6 === 2014 California Court Ruling in Favor of The SPH, and Fine False Victim $32,500 The false victim attempted to appeal the California lower court's decision to dismiss his case with fines against the false victim, but failed and was hit with another fine of $32,500. LINK TO ORDER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/C .- US-Win-VBAttnyFeeOrder2014.pdf

1 hourly rates, and therefore they are presumed reasonable Nonetheless, the Court finds 2 that the hourly rates claimed and actually billed by Defendants' counsel on appeal are reasonable besed upon their individual and collective experience b Hours Billed The total numbers of hours claimed on appeal is thoroughly 5 documented by detailed conternporancous time records, which were submitted as part of the Motion Defendants' are claiming $42,132 00 in fees Other than a goneral 7 objection to all fees, Plaintiff did not challenge any specific billing entres The Court has thoroughly reviewed all Defendants' counsels' billings and finds that $32,500 00 mn fees is the reasonable number of hours spent on this matter and is commensurate with 10 the nature of the appeal and Plantiff's numerous filings relating to the appeal THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the Motion for Attorncy's Fees is GRANTED, and Defendants Nithyananda Foundation and Life Blass Foundation are awarded their reasonable attorney's fecs as costs against Plaintiff Vinay Bharadway in the total amount of $32,500 00

15 127/14 Dat 16 on Judge Keith D Davis 17

=== Page 7 === Washington (USA) Court Convicts False Victim for Multiple Counts of Child Molestation In 2012, a Washington State Judge sentenced the false victim to 5 years of prison for his crimes against a U.S. minor girl. After his prison term, the false victim was deported back to India by US Immigration Court for crimes of moral turpitude. Case No. 10-1-10009-8 SEA

LINK TO JUDGMENT: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/FELONYJUDGMENTSENTENCE.pdf

=== Page 8 === FILED HIVİ SEP 21 2012 DEPUTT COMMITMENT ISSUED SEP 2 4 2012 PRESENTENCING STATMENT & INFORMATION ATTACHED SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY STATR OF WASHINGTON, Plaineciff. No. 10-1-10009-3 SEA JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE FELONY (FJS) VINAY KESHAVAN BHARADWAJ Şee non-felony J+5 Dsfeodanr L. HEARING L1 Tae defendant, the dolondan's lawyer, JOHN BROWNE. the senteneing hearias condueted todayy. Ohvers preset were

IT. FINDINGS Thare being so reason wlty jadgment should not be peonounced, the cotart fiads: 2.1 CURRENT OFFENSE(S) The delendant was found gailty on 08/14/2012 by bench trial gf. Coun No: J Crine: CHIL.D MOLESTATION IN THE SECOND DECREE RCW 9410A Crime Code 01272 Dote of Crime: Lia2:rs T0UOH 24302202 lecient No. Count No: 11 Crime: CHILD MOLESTATION IN THE SECOND DEOREE RCW 26.44016 Crime Code: DRo Data of Crine: 11/21/2008 THROUOH 04/10/2209 Caont No .: 1f1 Crime: CHILD MOLESTATICN IN THE SECOND DEGREE RCW 9A.44 016 Crime Code: 0AD2 Dute of Crime: 11-7/2008 1-01051081 04 002009 Deient No. Coust Nai Crima: RCW Crins Codm Due of Grimet Ieldet No. [ ] Addlional surrent efffonscs are attached in Aggendix A

Michigan (USA) Detective Confirms No Charges on The SPH Email from U.S. Ann Arbor Detective to U.S. Attorney Margolis confirms that no case has been or is pending against The SPH, despite the allegation submitted by Rao to the Ann Arbor Police Department.

=== Page 9 === LINK TO ANN ARBOR POLICE DETECTIVE EMAIL: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/04 .- attachment Lencioni-Email.pdf

Margolis Law Firm From: Larry Margolis <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 3:34 PM Te: "Margolis Law Firm' Subject: FW: Asrthi Rao

From: Lencioni, Michael [mallto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 1:23 PM Te: Larry Margolis Subject: Aarthi Rao Mr. Margolis: Per our telephone conversations, I am providing the following information regarding my knowledge of Aarthi Rao and Srl Nithyananda Swami. On or about November 6, 2011, the Ann Arbor Police Department received a packet of information via US Mail. Among the documents enclosed, Ms. Rao alleged that Sri Nithyananda Swami hed made theeats to her life and sexually abused her, induding rape. Speciffically, Ms. Rao wrote, "Nithyananda is not only a sexual predator and a con artist, but also the leader of a dangerous Cult and poses a serlous threat to American citizens. Iam one of several victims raped and abused by Nithyananda, I urge you to investigate the fraud, sexual abuse, money laundering and racketeering affairs of Nithyananda Swami .... " As a result of this information, in December 2011, I attempted to contact Ms. Rao on more than one (1) occasion via telephone. I received a couple of return emails from Ms. Rao regarding the information/documents sent to AAPD. I explained in a returned email that I would need to meet with her or at least speak with her about the allegations. In October 2012, I again exchanged emails with Ms. Rao regarding the information/documents provided to the Ann Arbor Police Department. As of April 12, 2013, I have not met face to face with Ms. Rao, nor have we communicated via the telephone. As a result of no in-person contact or meaningful communication to support her allegations, I have not initiated any police report or conducted any formal investigation. I am unaware of anyone within the Ann Arbor Police Department, previously or presently, conducting any investigation Involving Aarthi Rao and/or Sri Nithyananda Swami. Detective Michael Cencioni Ann Arbor Police Department 301 E. Huron Avenue Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 (734) 794-6930 x 49317 - Desk (734) 994-8291 - Fax

=== Page 10 === Letter from US Lawyer Jeffrey Willis

A detailed report by U.S. Attorney, Jeff Willis, to Human Rights Attorneys & Indian investigative agencies details the facts leading to the Federal Court order against the False Victim, and cites multiple findings of the U.S. Courts and other evidences against False Victim.

LINK TO REPORT: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Jeff-Willis-report.pdf

The allegations contained in Plaintiff's Complaint are deemed admitted as true against Defendant. Order of Judge Marbely at page 2. (SDOH ECF No. 31, attached hereto as Exhibit B.) Based on the evidence showing Rao's false and defamatory statements causing significant damages to Nithyananda Dhyanapectam of Columbus, Judge Marbely ordered judgment against Aarthi Rao for damages in the amount of $463,211.25, plus attorneys' fees in the amount of $10,568.30, costs in the amount of $603.20, and post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per annum. The current amount due on the judgment as of February 14, 2020 is S552,755.15. The judgment was transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan for collections since Rao had resided in that federal district. The federal Michigan case is captioned: Nithyananda Diryanapeetam of Columbus v. Aarthi Rao, et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 2:13-CV-00526 ("EDMI Litigation"). The EDMI Litigation and collection efforts are currently ongoing, but have been frustrated by Rao's misuse of her U.S. passport and ability to hide in India to avoid the United States judicial system. Evidence that Refutes Rao's False and Defamatory Allegations In addition to a federal distriet judge in the United States ruling that Rao's statements were defamatory and caused significant damage to Nithyananda Dhyanapcetam of Columbus, the following evidence also refutes Rao's allegations of rape: (1) she admitted, in writing and prior to her extortion efforts, that she never had any sexual interactions with His Divine Holiness; (2) her own medical records show no evidence of rape and refute her allegations; (3) medical records of His Divine Holiness show that he had no ability to commit the rape; (4) after years of making defamatory statements, she changed her story and began alleging that the sexual contact was consensual; and (5) records show discrepancies in her story and the fact that an alleged rape incident could not have occurred as she alleges.

=== Page 11 === Half a Million Dollar Judgement & Order Against False Victim in the Federal Court in Ohio, USA Based on the evidence showing Rao's false and defamatory statements causing significant damages to Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam of Columbus, Judge Marbely ordered judgment against Aarthi Rao for damages in the amount of $463,211.25, plus attorneys' fees in the amount of $10,568.30, costs in the amount of $603.20, and post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per annum. The current amount due on the judgment as of February 14, 2020 is $552,755.15. LINK TO COMBINED ORDER & JUDGMENT: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/05 .- Jeff-Email-Mentioning-Order-of-Ohio-cas e-with-orders-attached.pdf August 12, 2014 U.S. FEDERAL COURT JUDGEMENT United States District Court - Southern District of Ohio Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam of Columbus v. Aarthi S. Rao, Case No. 2:13-CV-00526 https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Judgment1.pdf

=== Page 12 === UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

JUDOMENT IN CIVIL CASZ NITHEANANSA BHANAFEETAM OF COLM JOGE ALGENON L MARELEY Magitrai Julg King AARTHES.RAO Delendant.

trlod and the jury has sendoru ise verdict.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED Tht pursuant to the Aagasi 12, 2004 Ceder, Judgramt ia entered in favor of Paintit, end ngairet Defendant Ran, in the asexat of Fout bhesdrod Sixty:Three Thosasd, Twe Handred Eleven aesd 25 even aesd 25/100 Dollars (5467,211.25], pls attoreys fees ($10,598.30), pks oosts (5603.20), plus post-judgmcnt iniered in the ancunt of 7% por

Daie: Aagast 12, 2014 Jebn Brhnes, Clrk Bety L. ChirkDeputy Clerk

August 12, 2014 U.S. FEDERAL COURT ORDER United States District Court - Southern District of Ohio Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam of Columbus v. Aarthi S. Rao, Case No. 2:13-CV-00526 Amount Owed by Rao to Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam of Columbus: Four Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven and 25/100 Dollars ($463,211.25), plus attorneys fees ($10,568.30), plus costs ($603.20), plus post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per annum. $474,382.75 + INTEREST https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Order.pdf

=== Page 13 === Case: 2:13-cv-00526-ALM-NMK Doc #: 31 Filed: 08/12/14 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 218

For good cause shown, this Court finds that Defendant Aarthi S. Rao is in default of answer of the causes of action set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint. The allegations contained in Plaintiff's Complaint are deemed admitted as true against Defendant. The Court further finds that, upon Plaintiff's evidence submitted, including the affidavit testimony of Gowri Rammohan (Doc. 30-4) and counsel, Jeffrey A. Willis, Esq. (Doc. 30-5), Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount equal to Four Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven and 25/100 Dollars (S463,211.25), plus attorney's fees ($10,568.30), plus costs ($603.20), plus post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per annum. It is hereby ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant Rao, in the amount of Four Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven and 25/100 Dollars ($463,211.25), plus attorney's fees (S10,568.30). plus costs (S603.20), plus post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per annum. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Algenon L. Marbley ALGENON L. MARBLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: August 12, 2014

=== Page 14 === Michigan (USA) Court Orders Two Bench Warrants for Arrest in 2013 and 2014 Against False Victim Due to the false victim's repeated contempt of court, a Michigan Judge issues a contempt of court order and two bench warrants for arrest against the false victim, Rao for her failure to follow court orders, including her mandatory appearance at her deposition. November 20, 2013 Bench Warrant State of Michigan - Trial Court For The County Of Washtenaw Case: 13-714-CZ LINK TO ORDER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ex .- M-Rao-Bench-Warrant-11.20.13-cQ py Redacted-copy.pdf

=== Page 15 === STRHE OF MICHIZAN CAISE WA CINL CIRCLET BENCH BWAREMT

---

AREISUS RAO I THE NAME OF THE PEDPLE OF THE STATE OF DIGAN: TOANY POAGE OFFICER ON GOURT OFFCER MITHORDED TO NKE AREST

NOV 2 0 203 SDONALD E SHELTON HETUNM

Eshibil M POC N CT BENDH WARRANT --

=== Page 16 === 2014 Contempt of Court against False Victim

LINK TO ORDER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ex .- P-Rao-10.9.14-Motion-for-Contempt-Cert ified-Order3.pdf

Sep. 30. 2014 1:55PM THE ORAPER LAW FIRM Na. 3231 P. 3/6

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE TRIAL COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHTENAW AW LIFE BLISS FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, CASE NO .: 13-714-CZ HON. TIMOTHY P. CONNORS v. AARTHI RAO, individually, Defendant. David R. Draper (P43750) Edward Alan Macvy (P72939) THE DRAPER LAW FIRM Jennifer B. Salvatore (P66640) Attomney for Plaintiff Nacht, Roumel Salvatore Blanchard & Walkeg PC 18580 Mack Avenue Attomney for Defendant Grosse Polnte Farms, MI 48236 101 N. Main St., Ste. 555 (313) 885-6800 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 (734) 663-7550 CIRCUIT COURT TOTH OCT 9 PM 3 316 FILED ORDER OF THE COURT This matter having come before this Honcesble Court aed the Court being otherwise Sully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant Aarthi Rao is held in contempt of the Court for vielation of this Court's Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a bench wurrant as to Defendant Aarthi Rao shall isge in the amount of $25,610.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard and Walkes, P.C. will serve this Order and the bench warrant upon Defendant Aarthi Rao at her last known address and explain to Defendant Amthi Rao the consequences of non-compliance with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this contempt Order shall dissolve upon Defendans Aarthi Rao sitting for a creditoe's exam and anarwering all apgropriate questions posed to her within thirty (30) days.

=== Page 17 === September 18, 2014 Bench Warrant for Arrest State of Michigan - Trial Court For The County Of Washtenaw Case: 13-714-CZ LINK TO ORDER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AR-DS1-2-Rao-Bench-Warrant-10.20.14-1pg. pdf

=== Page 18 === Sep. 30. 2014 1:56PM THE BRAPER LAN FIRM No. 3231 F. 5/6

STATE OF MICHIGAN CASE NO. JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY BENCH WARRANT WASUTENAW

Police Raport, Ny 734)222-3385

LIFE BLISS POUNOATION AARTH S.RAO

IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN: TO ANY PEACE OFFICER OR COURT OFFICER AUTHORIZED TO MAKE ARREST: The peraon named below fa ledte appnar before this cout, as ordorod, to show csese wby ahe should not be hold in conlempt. Thoretota, Fordor you to anesl:

Bing him/or beloe te court immodiadoly or sls may be rolconed whes a cawtpaformance bond is pouted in the amount of foe personal appeoronce bellore the courl el tts nndt BESsiOs 12-20-2014

RETURN By vnue df dés waant, i heve taitpn To person samed sbove ino oustody as endanad

CASCUTE COURT 2011 OCT 21 .PM 1 C9 FILED

P0O N (Nn BENCH WARRANT --

$25,610 California Judgment in 2013 Against False Victim

Due to the false victim's repeated contempt of court, a California Judge issues a judgement of $25,00 against the false victim, Rao for her failure to follow court orders, including her mandatory appearance at her deposition.

=== Page 19 === Superior Court of California, County of Riverside Life Bliss Foundation v. Aarthi Rao Case No .: RIC1105004

LINK TO ORDER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/RAO MTS FinalOrder JudgeBarkley April18-2012.pd f

--- ---- - --

Michigan (USA) Court Orders U.S. Medical Records of False Victim to be given to the Attorney of The SPH

=== Page 20 === A Michigan Judge considers the medical records as critical evidence in exonerating The SPH in the Indian case and orders the University of Michigan Hospital to produce the records to the Attorney's of The SPH. The University of Michigan immediately obeyed the the Order and produced the detailed medical records, which confirm her allegations to be false and which also revealed glaring date discrepancies in her allegations.

LINK TO ORDER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/114 .- Order-Granting-Petitioners-Mtn-t o-Compel-Discovery-Medical-Records.pdf

STATE OF MICHGAN IN THE TRIAL COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHTENAW IN RE: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN CASE NO:970-42 HEALTH SYSTEM David S. Swartz SRI NITHYANANDA SWAML Petitioner Dwvid R. Dreper (P43750) THE DRAPER LAW FIRM Amomey fic Petitioner 18580 Mack Avesue Grosse Peinte Farms, MI 48236 (313) 885-6800 ORDER GRANTING FETITIONER'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY - MEICAL RECORDS At a session of said Court beld in the City of Ann Arbor, County of Weshtenaw, State od Michigen, on AUIG 0 8 2012 DAVID S. SWARTZ PRESENT: HON. TRIAL COURT JUDGE Argoment having been heard, and the Coun being fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED thi photocopies of Aarth Rao's University of Michigan Henlth System medical records be provided te Petitione's counsel, Devid R. Draper. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED thai this infoemation be peovided within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. TRIALG DONID SWARTZ

=== Page 21 === California (USA) Court Orders Indian Media to Pay $5M to SPH USA NonProfits for Defamation

California civil court awards SPH US Non Profit nearly $5M for lies, defamation and disinformation against The SPH and The SPH US mission

LINK TO ORDER: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/116 .- Samaya Judgmentonly-1.pdf

CIVRS 1481645 1 THECLE

POUNDATION, & Califbrla son-grodit eorposstion SAMAYA TV, an Endiin Company;

$4,534,732.57 10 -- TOFA ---. GILBERT G. OCHOA tFE CEC 0 8 2017 CLEAK S CORTINCATE (OparS)

Highlights of the The False Case

=== Page 22 === Against The SPH 1. 2 March 2010: A morphed video released by Sun TV (March 2, 2010) showing The SPH (Swamiji) with a woman. In 2012 Sun-TV's COO Hansraj Saxena confessed to Sun TV morphing the video for blackmail and extortion purposes. FBI experts independently proved this video to be morphed.

LIVE

That news editor and the man in his department, the threatening drama what they did is this Nithyananda JAYA "PLUS மாநாட்டில் முதவமைக்சர் உரை

=== Page 23 === India's Sun TV Executive Confesses to Extortion and False Video:

=== Page 24 === LINK TO AFFIDAVIT: https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1 .- affidavit-of-Dharmaraja-Hansraj-Saxena.ndf Case 5:13-cv-00393-VAP-SP Document 155-3 Filed 11/03/14 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:2603

1 DECLARATION OF DHARMARAJA HANSRAJ SAXENA 1 I, Dharmaraja Hansraj Saxena, declare and state as follows: 1. I have personal knowledge of all of the facts contained in this declaration and, if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify to all of said facts. 2. I deny any wrongdoing in this case. 3. I was a corporate officer of Sun TV Network Limited ("Sun TV") from 2009 to 2011. I was the Chief Operating Officer of Sun Pictures, a division of Sun TV. I was an employee of Sun TV from 1994. 4. As a corporate officer of Sun TV Network Limited, I had high-level discussions with the other corporate officers of Sun TV and the members of the 11 Board of Directors of Sun TV. I was highly familiar with the operations of Sun TV 12 in general, not just the film division, which I headed, 13 5. In March of 2010, V. Raja was the head content editor of Sun TV's news 14 programming. S. Kannan was the Chief Technical Officer. R.M.R. Ramesh was the 15 head of Kal Publications, which was effectively part of Sun TV and effectively 16 owned by Sun TV. 17 As of March 2010, I had personal knowledge from my working at Sun TV that V. Raja, S. Kannan, and R.M.R. Ramesh had a routine practice of using the broadcasting of false news stories and true stories that have fabrications added to 30 Extort moncy from individunls and organizations. This happened ot least seven times. 21 likely more. These three individuals would use associates to have much of the direct 22 contact with the victims. 23 7. Prior to March of 2010, I shared information with Kalanithi Maran that 24 there are specific complaints about these people V. Raja, S. Kannan, and R.M.R. Ramesh on extortion activity. And Kalanithi Maran also indicated to me that he beard 26 and received complaints on specific incidents and he condoned it. 27 8. A board meeting which comprised of Kalanithi Maran , S.Kannan ,

SAXENA DECLARATIIN

=== Page 25 === 2. 21 April 2010: Case of rape, cheating etc. was illegally filed on The SPH based on this morphed video and The SPH was even taken into custody for 53 days though there was no rape victim. The SPH stated from DAY ONE that he was NOT PHYSICALLY CAPABLE of sexual act and that he should be tested. But surprisingly the CID did not do any medical tests. They claim the interrogation videos which recorded SPH's statements, were "LOST". Instead, they put out appeals on television, newspapers, Facebook and other social media urging "victims to come forward":

"The CID Superintendent of Police Yogappa, in a release here, said all those affected and the victims of Nityananda were free to contact him and depose. He said the travel expenses of those willing to depose before him and provide information would be met by the department and their identities kept in utmost secrecy." [Indian Express]

3. 23 July 2010: The case was about to be quashed by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka as shown in the High Court Proceedings excerpt from 23 July 2010 hearing of the quash petition:

" ... there is no material for the offences under Sections 376 and 420 IPC ... "

4. 17 August 2010: 6 months after the false complaint filed by Lenin, after no case was made out against The SPH, when the false case was about to collapse, another conspirator behind the morphed video, US citizen Ms. Arathi Rao with pseudo-name Ms. Amala, posed as a false rape victim to sustain the false case lest it fall and the truth behind the extortion and conspiracy lead to the exposure of Lenin and her and their resultant arrest.

This was inspite of blatant facts like Aarthi Rao herself had admitted as later as end of 2009 she had not suffered any kind of sexual abuse or even knew of anyone else who suffered any such abuse at the hands of The SPH.

2009 Rao Email Excerpt

=== Page 26 === Premastwari Mayi Hithyananda <[email protected]

re. my conversation 1 mesangs Premasiwwori Wagi Nithyananda <[email protected] Thu, Jul 30, 2069 at 6:06 PM Nthyonandom Ma, Hare is the convaraation I had with Virealonarida lat nita at 11:00 pm i'm puling doun as much ae ll can racoileot in deteit. Not all the words may be exaelly as sald, but al the key idaaa ore as I haard & undendood Vireelanonde: Nitryanandam ma. I want to laik lo you about something. happenning. You ware there in LA so you have heerd sore of it in the meelings. is condnuing hare and more is Promastwarl: Ya. Isercereber. So whals up? soan thi happan many tires V: I teei whan paspla know a few secseta of Swam, they are invadlataly pushed away ond supressed. I hove P. Thai doseni make much serda, bcoa I they kno a fow sacsila, and they ore pushed awiy, tiry can ga out and naveai all those secrets. Big why would Swomi wont lo do that? V: Swemi has hud relationships with morry woman. I am aleo one of fhose wilh uhom he had a rolafonshj. Did you know Radhika? P. Yera, a litsa - the ane fom 8an Dlago? V. Yes. Rachika lat bees she wim coniinuously pressured to do thinga. She was constanty presaured by Suami io became a Radhiui. Sha couldni hondle hhat préiriure. There pre many Cdes liba thot. I wonk io talk Io you and find out il you have had any such anperienos. You ars a lady devolee and you have been inthe experiences ashram. Hove you had any such expefence? I am taling to 1 or 2 people to ksow more about their She this haa huppaned to me P: have so diruct knawladge of ony of thass things yau ane saying. in ell my persoeal asperiences, nothing

5. 6 November 2011: Arathi Rao filed a similar false complaint in her home country USA alleging rape by The SPH. The USA police did not even register a case on the complaint filed by Arathi Rao as no case was even made out:

"Numerous documents were submitted to the Ann Arbor Police Department regarding Swami and Rao. At this point, I am unaware of any active investigation regarding the abuse, nor am I aware of any criminal warrants regarding the complaint."

6. 14 March 2012: Lenin was arrested for 108 days for extortion and blackmail after his Anticipatory Bail got rejected even by the Apex Court of India. The case is about to be chargesheeted.

7. August 2014: The US Federal Court in Ohio passed a judgment against Arathi Rao for defaming The SPH and for producing the morphed video. Arathi Rao was fined close to half a Million US Dollars by the Court as penalty. This is the second default judgment against Arathi Rao who faced a similar order by a California court for $25,000 in April 2012.

=== Page 27 === Cice: 2:13-cv-00525-ALM-NMC Doc #: 32 Fled: 00/12/14 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 219

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN INSTRICT OF GUIO JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE NITHYANANDA DHANAPEETAM OF COLAMBUS Case Na. 2/13-CV-00636 JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY Magtrate Judge King AARTHES, RAO.

[] Jury Verdlet. This action carac before the Court for a trid by jury. The haes have beon tried and fie jury bux renderod its vendicl. Il Deckdas ly Court. This actice came to wrial or hearing bedore the Coun. The hoam hang beentriedo heand and a decision ha been renderod. [X] Deckdus hy Court. Thi action was decidod by the Coun shout a trial or hcaing. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That pursuant to the August 12, 2014 Order, Judgment is entered in favee od PlaintafT, and against Defendan Rao, in the amount of Four Hundred Sisty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven and 25/100 Dollars (5463,211.25), plus attorneys fees (510.568.30), plus costs (S603.20), plus post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per ansum

Dae: August 12.2014 John Hehman, Clerk Belly L. Chrk Betty L. Clark/Deputy Clerk

https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Judgment1.pdf

https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Order.ndf

8. Vinay Bharawaj - a Convicted CHILD RAPIST - who is currently in jail in Seattle, USA added a complaint of unnatural sex against Swamiji just to escape from his case. His charge of Homosexuality too is proven false by the Victoria hospital medical test which says that there is absolutely no evidence of Swamiji having participated in unnatural sex.

=== Page 28 === PRESENTENCING STATMENT & NFORMATION KTTACHED SUPEBIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON TOR KING COENTY ITATE OF WARENOTON

KOCHENT ANOSENTENEE Ser rom-fetony 3+5

Hyperienlan xh of which may coduce pormesy. Anper te soquen of the Inverdping off =z Formale Ie ence labarmecy o debet pesnce of sey dugs which cocld atfn the peseney afs 15.69. 2014.

Vinay Bharadwaj's conviction for Child Molestation by Seattle Court and The SPH's medical report showing no evidence of unnatural sex. https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/FELONYJUDGMENTSENTENCE.pdf

=== Page 29 === 9. The cases filed by US Citizens Arathi Rao and Vinay Bharadwaj in their home country USA have already been ruled against them and they have been fined heavily for defaming The SPH.

TUCHMAN & ASSOCIATES LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP AVIV L. TUCHMAN, ESQ. (SB#133321) JEFFREY S. RANEN, ESQ. (SB#224285) 2 MICHAEL C. DICECCA, ESQ. (SH#159367) MEGHAN E. MeCORD, ESQ. (SB#242281) 6080 Weat Pico Boulevard 221 Nerth Figugon Street, Suite 1200 Los Angrles, CA 90035 Los Angeles, Califorsin 90012 Tel: (23) 653-7100 Tel (213) 250-1800 Fax: (523) 653-7400 Fax: (213) 250-7900 Attomeys for Defendants Nithyananda Attomeys for Defendans Nithyrnanda Foundatioa; Foundonion; Life Bliss Foundation, Gopal Life Bliss Founderon Gopal Reddy Shoelum; Siva Reddy Sheelam; Siva Vallabhaneni, Ragiai Vallobbnseni; Ragini Vallabhaneei; and Ma Nithya Vallabhaneni; Iutemonional Goveraing Body Sadhananda Commicion of Nithyastnda Dhyarapeetum FILED and NEdiyaraada Mission; and Ma Nithya Sadbausanda RANGHO GUGAMONGA DUTRILY 10 NOV 36 2012 KAUFMAN DOLOWICH VOLECK & GONZO LLP = FRANCES O'MEARA, ESQ, (SB4140600) SANJAY BANSAL, ESQ. (SB#151563) NANCVE CARSOZA CEPJTY 12 11755 Wilshire Boulevard, Suie 2400 13 Los Angeles, Califomia 90025 Tel: (310) 775-6511 Fax: (310) 375-9720 15 Attomeys foc Defendants Nithyonanda Foudatien; Life Blias Fousdation; Gopal Reddy Sheelenc 16 Siva Vellebhureni; Ragiai Vellebbaseni; and Ma Nithya Sedenandla 17 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 18 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO VINAY RHARADWAJ, ) CASENO .: CIVR8L013793 20 Plaintiff, Assigned Far All Purpases Tec ) Ho. Jadge Keih D. Davis Department R6 SRI SWAMI NITHYANANDA, M ) [PROPOD] ORDER GRANTING indlividanl, and agert and employee of DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR Nithyasonda Foundation, Life Bliss TERMINATING ANINOR ISSUE 24 Foundition, Interrtional Goveraing Body ) SANCTIONS; REQUEST FOR 25 Commission Of Nithyananda Dhyanspeetam ) MONETARY SANCTIONS And Nithyananda Mission, Dhyanapeeta 26 Charitable Trust, and Dhyanapeetam Hindu Dake : Novembec 26, 2012 27 Temple & Cuturl Celer, et al. Time : 8:30 a.m. Delendnts. Departmemt: RG

<HADER GRANTING DFENDANTS' SOTION FOR TERMINATING ANDOR ISSUE SACTIONS, REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

=== Page 30 === 1 23. This moat secent misase of diseovery is eecsidered alengside Pleimsift's extensive history of eiscovery shuse in this cuc. Th: Court's file is mplde wah evirenec of cmmtinurux te of dilatory taatks and misuse of discowery by Plxiatiff. For esamplec a Plaistiff esrereneed this eetion oa Jermuey 3, 2011. On twe seperile oceaitora, Ocnher 19, 2011 and then Norember 17, 2011, Plaintiff tricd io any thia netias perding the resolstion of his criminal cane in Washingoot, wifsou: S100. b. Also, PlaistifT eepestedly failed end sefused to apgexr for deposition, whict was first noliced foe Apeil 20, 201L. This onssed Defendant ta file a Motioa to Conpel and remlted in sectiona sgperot Meintiff andl a. Court Onker fin hix deproitias, ulrich he violsied. Uefeerbnts fren filed a Mation fhe Termiwing Sanction which lad du asother Court Deder en Jansary 5,2012 far Pieirtifr's depceltiae, which firalty mook plase on Febeaary 14, 2012 acarly en year afer it was fis noticed. c. On May 4, 2012, P'berdif filed : frivrimts Metion fre Pmizetive Onder tn ielay 14 the dopesitios of a third puery witness Yarini Narerkr, The Metion was deried and 15 Pleintifl was sonctioned. d. Reoeatly, mes Nirvember 6, 2012, thin Court granted three Matiara to Campel 17 diseaeery againei Plaistiff, ho of wlich were Ernpprd. 'The Mreinns concemedl 18 discovery thet was due and oetstonding well betoee Plakrtiff's crireinel trio. 19 24. Pleintiff's persident failure ind ceftal to sornply with dimcovery in thia cose renils in the preuamption, as a rueter ne law, that his wneriod caanes of actien are withenal meril. 25. Accoodingly, it is in the inhuags of bslas thet Pleictift's Second Amepded Corbint beunmiased with prejialice as ageiest the Defeadenrs. THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT Defendast Motien fin Terminaiing Senetians nd/or lssces Sanctioes is GRANTE aod fst Paistiff's Secand Amended Corepairt ix diariond 25 wiwwpjadice in agaias Delendents Nitkenande Fuankiou, Life Bls Fouadalion, Ghoond Brody 26 Shochus, Sivs Vallablenens, loaynl vattemt, fciteeted Govening Body Coramimion of Nithzrando Dhyonapeetam ond Nithyonando Missios, Me Nithya Sadhenenda, and Nitryarapds Dhyaropodem Terple &. Culteral Certer.

ORDER GRANTIMG DEFENDANTS MUTHIN FUL TERMINATING ANDOR ISSUE SACTKINS: REQUEST FOR MOMETARY SANCTKINS