A Global Call for Concrete Action for the Elimination of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance: Report by Kailash Union

A global call for concrete action for the elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action

Report by Kailash Union

BRITISH ORIGIN OF THE CASTE SYSTEM - A PERPETUATION OF RACISM & RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AGAINST HINDUS

British colonizers strategically and cunningly distorted the Hindu indigenous traditions and culture, including distorting the varna system into a rigid caste hierarchy. They devised a census program without any consultation with the native population to disempower the Hindu backbone. From 1840-1925, they enforced the division in the Hindu society with constructs. This enforced institutionalized divide marginalized millions of Hindus.

In 1871, the word “caste” was used by the colonial government to force-fit people groups in a pseudo-identity framework based on surname, appearances, facial features, etc.² The 1871 census data was used to create legislatures such as the Criminal Tribes Act (1871)³ that made prejudicial negative stereotypes, which arbitrarily declared any person a criminal by the very nature of his birth in a certain people's group, or by his professing a certain surname.

Such faulty generalizations coupled with negative stereotypes were applied to various people groups such as to Hindu scholars and priests who were presumed to be nepotistic by the virtue of their birth, surname, or profession⁴, and similarly, all Hindu monastic orders (Sanyasis) were presumed to be criminal by birth as per CTA. This kind of racism and violence against Hindus have resulted into the illegal annexation of lands of sovereign indigenous Hindu kingdoms, forcing their governments into exile.

This racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, Hindumisia and related intolerance persist in evolving forms even today. The United States of KAILASA is the re-establishment of these ancient Hindu Kingdoms by The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam. However, Hindumisic media narratives deny KAILASA’s statehood by labeling KAILASA as a “cult and “fictitious”. The denial of KAILASA's existence as a sovereign nation violates the fundamental right of the two billion Hindus to self-determination.

Research studies have concluded that India has the most corrupt media in the world⁵, which weaponize politically-owned media platforms, with vested interests, to attack minority groups and their ideologies, inciting violence through hate speech. KAILASA has become a victim of this anti-Hindu hate speech and the racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance and violence they provoke.

HINDU HOLOCAUST

The Hindu civilization has for the last 2000 years gone through a massive Hindu Holocaust⁶ resulting in the loss of 56 Hindu nations covering 6 million km² of land. 500+ million Hindus have been massacred, 4+ million Hindus enslaved, 160+ million Hindus starved to death, thousands of Hindu temples ⁷ destroyed, and 1+ million Hindu educational institutions destroyed and Hindu libraries burnt.

THE JURIDICAL STATEHOOD OF KAILASA

[]KAILASA is a sovereign subject of international law-possessing distinctive attributes, derived from SPH’s inheritance of the unbroken succession and the revival of three ancient Sanātana Hindu sovereign states: Surya Vamsa Surangi Samrajya Sarvajnapeetha, Suvarnapeetha Swargapura Samrajya Sarvajnapeetha, and the Shyamala Peetha Sarvajnapeetha. In addition, Kanchi KAILASA Sarvajnapeetha and seventeen sovereign Sanatana Hindu ecclesiastical historical institutions receive customary recognition by the UN as per the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

At the time of the British withdrawal from India in 1947, 565 independent Hindu sovereign princely states were officially recognized in the Indian subcontinent.⁸ The Surangi Kingdom was amongst them.⁹ Even though the "Instrument of Accession" did not remove the kingdom's sovereignty¹⁰, after their land was ceded, their sovereign land was forcibly stripped. Further, the Hindu Kings of these states were corrupted by the assurance of a personal "Privy purse" ¹¹ ¹², which was later unilaterally abolished¹³, in exchange for selling out the Hindu traditions and constitutional principles. Annexation by force and corruption is illegal under international law, per various international legal frameworks and customary international laws.¹⁴

[]

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Doctrine of Continuity - International law recognizes a state's legal personality by recognizing its identity. This perspective extends to periods of annexation or occupation, where the legal personality of a state is considered to persist, enabling its subsequent re-establishment.²² By the doctrine of continuity²³ legal facts in the context of the history of the Hindu sovereign State of the Surangi Kingdom, SPH derives all sovereign rights and powers of the royal lineage as the Sovereign from His inheritance and continuation of the unbroken succession of the Surangi Kingdom.²⁴ ²⁵ While the territory of the Surangi Kingdom was annexed unlawfully, KAILASA has no territorial conflict with the Republic of India or any other nation and does not claim any territorial rights over its erstwhile territories.

Doctrine of Acquired Rights ²⁶ ²⁷ ²⁸ ²⁹ - Sovereign powers and rights acquired from the various lineages of these ancient sovereign Hindu states by SPH through succession as the Sovereign of these states and KAILASA through the unification of these states are absolute, undisputed, and additionally endorsed by the Republic of India through its treaty obligations.

Rights of the Deity and legal principles of Divine Sovereignty - The concept of Divine Sovereignty is universally recognized³⁰ and the concept of temple Deities owning property is a well-established legal principle.³¹ Just as in the case of Hindu Temples where the Deity is the owner of the temple and attached properties, the Presiding Deity of the Hindu Kingdom is the Sovereign of the Kingdom. The King of a Hindu nation was a mere regent of the Lord³², similarly to how the executive officers of the temples are mere servants³³ of the presiding Deity. Additionally, non-Hindu individuals cannot be trustees, executive officers, or personnel in the Hindu temples³⁴, and therefore, non-Hindus entities cannot take over a Hindu nation, or the non-Hindu government cannot run or annex a Hindu kingdom. Given the Doctrine of Continuity, the rights of the Deity and legal principles of Divine Sovereignty, Nehru’s annexation of Hindu kingdoms under a non-Hindu framework was unlawful ³⁵ ³⁶.

The United States of KAILASA within its historical cultural, religious legal framework has and shall remain in perpetuity in the future, notwithstanding the impacts of climate change during the time of Kumari Kandam³⁷, colonial legacies, annexation of territories by modern states and upheavals resulting in loss of physical territory. KAILASA, an eternal and timeless realm, has existed in perpetuity, its spirit and essence enduring despite the trials of time.

PERSECUTION OF SPH AND KAILASA

The re-establishment of KAILASA stirred opposition from Hindumisic ³⁸ forces who executed a massive persecution³⁹ on SPH and KAILASA.

+-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 2 March | Deep fake video was released on public media platforms | | 2010 | to incite xenophobia on SPH.⁴⁰ ⁴¹ ⁴² The animosity also | | | stemmed from SPH being of Tamil ethnicity living in | | | Karnataka State⁴³. | +===========+==========================================================+ | 2 and 3 | Mobs simultaneously attacked various monasteries of | | March | KAILASA’s community in various cities⁴⁴. | | 2010 | | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 9 March | Vagish Prasad wielded a sword and issued a death threat | | 2013 | to SPH live on a national television channel Suvarna | | | TV.⁴⁵ ⁴⁶ | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 26 March | Karnataka State Police (CID) unlawfully sent letters to | | 2010 | the banks holding the accounts of the public charitable | | | Trusts of the temple-monastery of SPH, illegally | | | ordering them to freeze⁴⁷ all the bank accounts of these | | | Trusts⁴⁸. | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | April | SPH was unlawfully apprehended by law enforcement | | 21 - June | authorities under the shadow of persecution, potential | | 13, | genocide, hate attacks, and xenophobic sentiments, | | | solely fueled by media influence stemming from a video, | | 2010 | despite the absence of any complainant or formal | | | accusation⁴⁹ pertaining to allegations of sexual | | | misconduct.⁵⁰ | | | | | | The initial false charges filed only came to court 8 | | | years later, and are still being litigated ⁵¹ ⁵². As of | | | the current date, SPH has not been convicted of any | | | crime in any jurisdiction. | | | | | | Contrarily, the individuals behind the spurious | | | allegations sought to initiate legal proceedings against | | | SPH across three states within the USA. | | | | | | During the period from 2012 to 2014, SPH was absolved of | | | all charges, while the false accusers were subjected to | | | legal sanctions, including imprisonment and monetary | | | fines exceeding $6 million⁵³, pertaining to defamation, | | | malicious prosecution, and related offenses. | | | | | | Hindumisic, racist and hindu phobic media⁵⁴ has not | | | published this exoneration till-date. | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 22 April | SPH was subjected to a ‘medical test’ in police custody. | | 2010, 9 | Witness accounts record that an excessive amount of | | PM | blood was withdrawn in the name of testing. | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 26 April | SPH was forced into another medical torture done under | | 2010 | police custody at an undisclosed location⁵⁵. | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 26 and 27 | SPH was subjected to water-boarding in the guise of | | April | another medical examination⁵⁶ in Jayadeva Hospital. | | | | | 2010 | | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 13 June | A court order prohibited SPH from exercising his right | | 2010 | to speech and practice his religion as a bail | | | condition⁵⁷. | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | From June | A local TV channel⁵⁸ in Karnataka re-broadcasted the | | 2012 | false accusation of the false rape accuser.⁵⁹ | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 9 June | The Chief Minister of Karnataka called SPH “an enemy of | | 2012 | the state” on public television and ordered the property | | | of the community seized illegally.⁶⁰ | +-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subsequently, SPH was arrested by the police, when he approached the on Ju 2012 Court for anticipatory bail against the false accusations against him of disrupting the peace when militants had attacked him and his disciples and monks in his home⁶¹. --------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- 14 June 2012 SPH was again illegally arrested. The High Court termed the arrest of SPH as “illegal”, “without any authority”, “contrary to law”, “without jurisdiction”⁶². However, there was no accountability⁶³ for the State terrorism or police torture and ill-treatment, such as the fact that 600 policemen⁶⁴ brutally rammed on SPH and choked Him by the neck all of which was aired on television⁶⁵.

8 September The state police subjected SPH to another medical torture 2014 in the guise of a potency test⁶⁶. SPH was subjected to cruel and inhumane treatment such as – forced violent masturbation, genital mutilation, barbaric anal examination⁶⁷ ⁶⁸ ⁶⁹.

6 September A Hindumisic media channel aired a media report where it 2017 falsely accused SPH of raping His own biological mother (a Hindu nun) on the occasion of His father’s demise.⁷⁰

11 October 2017 Based on xenophobic media reports, a single Judge of the High Court of Madras, Justice Mahadevan issued an order barring SPH and His community from entering their primary temple of worship in Madurai violating their right to practice religion guaranteed by Indian Constitution.

29 January 2018 The same judge threatened to illegally arrest SPH in a civil case based solely on the morphed video broadcast 8 years earlier. This is further evidence of the trial by media influence on Indian judicial system where the accused is guilty until proven innocent.⁷¹

3 May 2018 SPH was prohibited by the High Court of Madras itself from entering Madurai Aadheenam of which He is the 293rd successor. Though the order itself violates the constitution, Justice Mahadevan upheld the decision and even threatened SPH that He would order arrest of SPH if SPH did not resign from His responsibility as the successor ⁷² ⁷³.

End of 2018 SPH was forced to leave His country to protect His person and was illegally exiled into statelessness by denial of natural citizenship.⁷⁴ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In February 2024, the court has acknowledged the heinous crimes committed by Hindumisic forces against SPH and KAILASA and charged Lenin Karupan with rape, extortion, and criminal intimidation, and has ordered immediate action against him and lawyer Sridhar, co-conspirators in the creation of the deep fake video to defame SPH and in the brazen attempt to extort a substantial sum of 100 crore INR (over 12 million USD) from KAILASA⁷⁵.

RACIST, DISCRIMINATORY AND XENOPHOBIC MEDIA ATTEMPTS TO DELEGITIMIZE KAILASA’S STATEHOOD

On 24 Feb 2023, the Permanent Ambassador of KAILASA and Hindu Nun of The Sovereign Order of KAILASA’s Nithyananda, H.E. Vijayapriya Nithyananda, made an official public statement⁷⁶ at the UN in Geneva⁷⁷. The statement raised the concern of ongoing persecution⁷⁸ of SPH and KAILASA.

The statement made by H.E. Vijayapriya Nithyananda sparked an unprecedented backlash of more than 1,000 media stories across multiple print, digital and social media platforms across more than 8 countries⁷⁹ and reporting in more than 13 languages⁸⁰. This was a scathing attack⁸¹ by the media to delegitimize SPH and KAILASA’s statehood against above-mentioned international laws. On November 3, 2023, KAILASA established bilateral relations with two municipalities of Paraguay⁸². This move sparked a widespread media backlash across the globe, with reports in multiple languages referring to SPH as “Nithyananda, facing multiple charges in India” and “a fugitive Indian guru’s..”, and labeling KAILASA as a “fictional country.” The denial of KAILASA's existence as a sovereign nation not only undermines its purpose and necessity but also deprives Hindus of their fundamental right to self-determination⁸³. In recent victories for Hindus, several articles delegitimizing and defaming KAILASA and SPH have been removed, including by Washington Post⁸⁴.

POLICIES & MEASURES TAKEN BY KAILASA TO PREVENT RACISM, RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, XENOPHOBIA, & RELATED INTOLERANCE

Lessons learned from the Hindu Holocaust have led to the revival of KAILASA and establishing the Ancient Enlightened Sanatana Hindu Civilization. KAILASA's policies are mapped to the Manuvathi Dharma Shastra⁸⁵ and include Hindu governance⁸⁶, parliament⁸⁷, responsible democracy⁸⁸ and enlightened blissful living⁸⁹. The fundamental premise of the justice system of KAILASA is the truth of “Paramashivoham” - “I am Paramashiva”⁹⁰.

- Vasudeva Kutumbhakam⁹¹ - “The whole world is my family”

- Advaita (Oneness)⁹² ⁹³

- Brahmanyam Bahuputratam - Hinduism introduces you to you as the favorite inheritor of the Cosmos.

- Ahimsa (Non-violence)⁹⁴ - The principle upon which the Constitution of KAILASA is based and formed on ⁹⁵.

- First Amendment of the Constitution of KAILASA states: Every citizen has the right to cognize himself / herself as Paramashiva⁹⁶.

- All beings are Divine - KAILASA’s founding principle⁹⁷

- Gender equality - Hinduism recognizes 11 genders and respects same sex marriage⁹⁸.

- Vedic Feminism^(®) ⁹⁹

- 10 essential provisions for human well-being is provided free by KAILASA¹⁰⁰