Report on the Systemic Persecution of SPH and KAILASA: Accountability Gaps in Local and State Human Rights Implementation

Report on the Systemic Persecution of SPH and KAILASA: Accountability Gaps in Local and State Human Rights Implementation

A report by Kailash Union

Executive Summary

This report documents the systematic persecution of The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam and the United States of KAILASA by deep state elements in India and various local/state agencies, highlighting critical accountability gaps in human rights protection mechanisms at all levels of government.

The evidence reveals a coordinated campaign of persecution spanning over 15 years, involving fabricated charges, forced exile, property seizures, and targeted attacks on religious minorities and their institutions, with no accountability or redress from national or international bodies.

Background: The Systematic Persecution Campaign

On March 2, 2010, Sun TV—a political and state-aligned propaganda machine—executed a meticulously planned and orchestrated campaign to eliminate Hindu identity by broadcasting a fabricated deepfake video targeting SPH.¹

This was not an isolated incident, but a calculated strategy rooted in colonial-era Hindumisic hatred, weaponizing the full machinery of the state

¹https://nithyanandatruth.org/2011/10/11/law-takes-its-toll-on-suntv-leadership-coo-faces-slew-of-criminal-l

aw-suits/

https://nithyanandatruth.org/cultural-genocide/ https://kailaasa.org/about/worst-persecution-by-media-disinformation/

and media to incite violence, defame Hindu leadership, and further the ongoing cultural genocide against Hindus.²

This marked the beginning of nearly two decades of relentless persecution targeting the Ecclesiastical Head of two billion Hindus and the sovereign nation of KAILASA.

The Sun TV Chief Operations Officer later admitted in a televised interview and in a an affidavit to a US court³ that the channel manufactured fake news to target SPH, yet this confession was quickly removed from broadcast and no accountability measures were taken.

²https://time.com/6342873/india-sikhs-persecution/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-65481927 https://www.academia.edu/38627899/HINDUPHOBIA_IN_TAMIL_TELEVISION_A_CRITICAL_DISCOUR SE_ANALYSIS

https://www.npr.org/2022/11/30/1139711922/an-israeli-director-sparks-outrage-in-india-over-a-film-about-h indu-persecution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Hindu_sentiment

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/india/india-elections-varanasi-hindu-muslim-tensions-intl-hnk-dst

³A morphed defamatory video of the actress Ranjitha with SPH was spread virally over the print and electronic media by the deep state controlled Sun TV. The video was analyzed and proven to be false on almost 60 technical points by 4 independent forensic experts including from the FBI, Canada, etc. In 2012 the Chief Operations Officer of Sun TV gave a television interview accepting that the channel manufactured fake news to target SPH (18 Dec 2012 - Jaya TV - Hansraj Saxena’s Statement - Jaya TV (https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/Confession_of_Sun_TV_COO_Hansraj_Saxena_on_ national_television.mp4). This video was removed in hours after it was telecast; the AIAT legal archives have downloaded the same for evidence and records. Later in 2014, he reiterated this statement in an affidavit to a US court (US District Court, Central District of California, Case 5:13-cv-00393-VAP (SPx), document 156-3, 3 Nov 2014, Declaration of Dharmaraja Hansraj Saxena. https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/Affidavit_of_Dharmaraja_Hansraj_Saxena.pdf).

Although the courts ordered in her favor restraining the misinformation (W.P. 8619/2011, WP 7767/2010, 14/527/10-11-PCI, 2 Sept 2013 BCCC Order, NBSA #32/2014, etc.) and telecast of fabricated deep-fake videos, the media kept pushing the implementation of the order to various quasi-legal institutions (self-regulatory bodies run by the media itself). Finally, the media self-regulatory quasi-legal body, the NBSA ordered its member channels to remove fabricated defamatory videos from their websites (News Broadcasting Standards Authority Order No. 32 (2014) dated 27 Aug 2014, found Zee TV and Aaj Tak in contempt of court), and were ordered to apologize and also delete all similar videos from their websites also (refer point - 6 of the same order). None of the media houses complied with the order and kept reuploading, re-telecasting the same footage, and continue the misinformation propaganda to date.

Pattern of State-Sponsored Persecution

[]

4 5

+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 2 March 2010 | A deep fake video was released on public media | | | platforms to incite violence on SPH for reviving | | | KAILASA. | +=================+====================================================+ | 2010 | Ma Nithyananda Mayi Swami - Then known as | | | Ranjitha, was a well-known Indian actress with | | | over 18 years in the film and television industry. | | | | | | She made her Tamil film debut in 1992 and went on | | | to act in over 60 films across all four South | | | Indian languages. Notably, she received the Andhra | | | Pradesh Government Nandi Award in 1996 and was | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+

⁴ https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media, https://nithyanandatruth.org/

⁵Reports on Jagadish "Jaggi" Vasudev’s (Satguru) attempt to kill SPH https://www.gurumag.com/inside-sadhgurus-cult-empire/, https://www.youtube.com/live/uLFpZBpGj1A

+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | | recognized as the heroine with the most movie | | | releases for two consecutive years in Tamil | | | cinema. | | | | | | Her life took a tragic turn when the morphed | | | video, falsely implicating her with SPH, was | | | broadcast on Sun TV, leading to sensationalized | | | media coverage that damaged her reputation and | | | career without verification. | +=================+====================================================+ | March 2010 | A false case of rape was filed against SPH. There | | | was no rape victim mentioned in the complaint, | | | however, SPH was kept under police custody for | | | 53-days. | | | | | | During these 53-days: | | | | | | - Through several articles and television | | | reports, the media continuously claimed that | | | multiple women, some even going to the extent | | | of claiming 100, had been raped. | | | | | | - The media continuously claimed that the Police | | | were the source of information. | | | | | | - However, after 53-days of this, investigating | | | and questioning more than a hundred devotees | | | and disciples and people and despite bribed | | | solicitations for false victims in paid media | | | houses, the police could not find any victim | | | of rape! The police finally submitted a memo | | | in the court, claiming they had no evidence or | | | material whatsoever to establish any claims of | | | rape against The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism. | | | | | | The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka granted bail | | | to SPH Bhagavan Sri Nithyananda Paramashivam in | | | its order to Crl. P. 2328/2010 dated 11 June 2010. | | | In this order the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka | | | observed the undue media influence against SPH | | | Bhagavan Sri Nithyananda Paramashivam, as | | | mentioned in point number 13 (page number 12): | | | “However, it is not a matter for the court to | | | discuss | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | | since the issue was subsidized by the media by | | | telecasting the incident and a question mark is | | | created amongst the public as regard to the image | | | of Sanyasi or Swamiji.” | +=================+====================================================+ | 2 - 3 March | Mobs simultaneously attacked various monasteries | | 2010 | of KAILASA’s community in various cities. This | | | event was telecasted live on national TV. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 2010 | Unlawful shutdowns of the premier educational | | | system, Nithyananda Gurukuls, began. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 26 March 2010 | Karnataka State Police illegally froze all bank | | | accounts of the trusts, depriving monks of their | | | daily sustenance. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | April 21 - June | SPH was unlawfully apprehended by deep state, | | 13, 2010 | rogue law enforcement authorities under the shadow | | | of persecution solely fueled by media influence | | India | stemming from a video, despite the absence of any | | | victim or formal accusation pertaining to | | | allegations of sexual misconduct. | | | | | | The initial false charges filed only came to court | | | 8 years later, and are still being adjudicated | | | with no conviction till date after 15 years of | | | malicious prosecution. SPH has not been convicted | | | of any crime in any jurisdiction. | | | | | | In February 2024, the Ramanagara Indian court | | | acknowledged the heinous crimes committed by the | | | co-conspirators, a gang of Hinduismic forces, | | | against SPH and KAILASA. | | | | | | The Ramanagara Court has charged Lenin Karupan | | | with rape, extortion, and criminal intimidation, | | | and has | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+

----------------------------------------------------------------------- ordered immediate action against him and lawyer Sridhar, co-conspirators in the creation of the deep fake video to defame SPH and in the brazen attempt to extort a substantial sum of 100 crore INR (over 12 million USD) from KAILASA. The Ramanagara Court has issued 4 inter-state non-bailable arrest warrants (NBW) against Lenin Karuppan, who is currently on the run and his petition for anticipatory bail has been dismissed by the Court. Lawyer Sridhar has been in custody since February 9, 2024 and his petition for bail has been dismissed by the Court. ------------------ ----------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[]

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Hindumisic, racist and Hindu phobic media has not published this exoneration till-date.

+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 22 April 2010 | SPH was subjected to a ‘medical test’ in police | | | custody. Witness accounts record that an excessive | | | amount of blood was withdrawn in the name of | | | testing. | +=================+====================================================+ | 26 April 2010 | SPH was forced into another medical torture done | | | under police custody at an undisclosed location. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 26 and 27 April | SPH was subjected to water-boarding in the guise | | | of another medical examination. | | 2010 | | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 13 June 2010 | A court order prohibited SPH from exercising His | | | right to speech and practice His religion as a | | | bail condition.¹⁴ | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | From June 2012 | Asianet Suvarna News in Karnataka re-broadcasted | | | the false rape accusation of SPH. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 2012 | State-sponsored terror attacks occurred at the | | | Nithyananda Gurukul in Karnataka, deemed illegal | | | by the High Court. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 9 June 2012 | The Chief Minister of Karnataka called SPH “an | | | enemy of the state” on public television and | | | ordered | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+

⁶https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/tree/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusation ⁷https://kailaasa.org/briefings-statements/key-conspirators-behind-deepfake-video-arrested-sridhar-now-ja

iled-interstate-nbw-issued-for-lenin/

⁸ https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/116.-Samaya_Judgmentonly-1.pdf

⁹ https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Judgment1.pdf https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Order.pdf

¹⁰ https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/04.-attachment_Lencioni-Email.pdf

¹¹ https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1FDLLqGfXhjxc9k3eime2-DlozQOvnb0u

¹²https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ex.-M-Rao-Bench-Warrant-11.20.13-copy_Redacted-copy.pdf,https:

//kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ex.-P-Rao-10.9.14-Motion-for-Contempt-Certified-Order3.pdf,https://kailaa sa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AR-DS1-2-Rao-Bench-Warrant-10.20.14-1pg.pdf

¹³https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/RAO_MTS_FinalOrder_JudgeBarkley_April18-2012.pdf ¹⁴ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xm_cAPBr0t41fSNuXBJu-MhyVe3sqKCC/view?usp=sharing

+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | | the property of the community seized illegally. | +=================+====================================================+ | 13 June 2012 | Rather than receiving protection, SPH was arrested | | | when he sought anticipatory bail from the court to | | | counter false accusations leveled against Him. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 14 June 2012 | SPH was again illegally arrested and later | | | released when the High Court termed the arrest of | | | SPH as “illegal”, “without any authority”, | | | “contrary to law”, “without jurisdiction”. Despite | | | the fact that 600 policemen violently restrained | | | SPH and one policeman tried to strangle SPH, all | | | broadcasted on television, there has been no | | | accountability for the police brutality displayed | | | during this assault. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 9 March 2013 | Vagish Prasad, a Suvarna News television panelist, | | | wielded a sword and issued a death threat to SPH | | | live on a national television channel Suvarna | | | TV.¹⁵ | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | July 2013 | A Salesian clergy, Father Edward Thomas, and | | | neo-Hindutva extremist B. Shivaraj Gowda executed | | | a vexatious investigation on KAILASA’s Nithyananda | | | Gurukul to harass the students and their parents | | | and force a shutdown. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 17 September | The Karnataka State Department of Women and | | | Children forcibly, cruelly, and illegally | | 2013 | interrogated children in KAILASA’s Gurukul, | | | without the consent of the parents, with no video | | | recording of the examiners and late-night beyond | | | the time permissible by law. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 2014 | The Karnataka State Minister of Education | | | unlawfully ordered the shutdown of the Nithyananda | | | Gurukul, | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+

¹⁵ Based on the video evidence a city magistrate registered the formal complaint (FIR). FIR 81/2013 dated 10/March/2013 at the 8th Addl. CMM Court. Nrupatunga Road, Bangalore City

+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | | citing the Right to Education Act, despite the | | | Gurukul's legal exemption as a Vedic Pathashala. | +=================+====================================================+ | 8 September | The state police subjected SPH to another medical | | | torture in the guise of an inhumane potency test, | | 2014 | condemned by modern standards and banned in most | | | countries. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 2016 | Gurukul children including declared successors to | | | various ancient Hindu kingdoms have been subjected | | | to sexual abuse by cult leaders like Sarah | | | Landry¹⁶. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 6 September | A Hindumisic media channel aired a media report | | | where it falsely accused SPH of raping His own | | 2017 | biological mother (Hindu nun) on the occasion of | | | His father’s demise. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 18 January 2018 | Ma Nithyananditha, a Gurukul student, voiced out | | | against the defamatory sexualization of Hindu | | | female saint Aandal. She received death threats | | | over the phone, and several obscene morphed videos | | | depicting Ma Nanditha, 16 years old then, were | | | uploaded on social media by unknown revenge | | | groups. Over a year later, the nun was forced to | | | self-exile from the country. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 29 January 2018 | Justice Mahadevan threatened to illegally arrest | | | SPH in a civil case based solely on the deep fake | | | video broadcast 8 years earlier. | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | 3 May 2018 | SPH was prohibited by the High Court of Madras | | | from entering Madurai Aadheenam of which He is the | | | 293rd successor. Though the order itself violates | | | the constitution, Justice Mahadevan upheld the | | | decision | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+

¹⁶https://jesusmeditation.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/christ-consciousness.pdf;

https://oig-movement.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/7/5/127507372/oigo-declaration.pdf

¹⁷ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPLdljsLgV8

¹⁸https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/obscene-videos-case-cannot-take-back-prajwal-revannas-diplo

matic-passport-unless-there-is-court-order-says-mea/articleshow/109786323.cms

¹⁹On 23 February 2012, the Trial Court in the false case against SPH passed the order to “release interim custody of the passport till the disposal of the case”. https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2012-Feb-23_order-to-release-passport.jpghttps://shri kailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2012-Feb-23-CC204_order-to-return-passport-pg1.jpg , https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2012-Feb-23-CC204_order-to-return-passport-pg2.jpg https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2012-Feb-23-CC204_order-to-return-passport-pg3.jpg https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2012-Feb-23-CC204_order-to-return-passport-pg4.jpg In 2018 SPH was denied renewal of His passport though SPH is a born Indian, the Court had ordered custody of passport to SPH and SPH personally appeared for renewal of his passport and submitted his documents at the Passport office.

https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2018-Aug-24_illegal_mea_notice_without_even_signa ture.jpg

Even after revoking the passport of SPH, the passport office continued to harass by issuing another illegal notice, on 1 May 2019.

https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2019-May-01-notice-from-passport-office.jpeg

Due to this the vexatious legal notice, SPH cited, was forced to reiterate the entire previous proceeding to prevent further harassment.

https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2019-May-06-reply-to-notice-from-passport-office.jpg Other Links and Evidences

https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2010-April-15_illegal_show_cause_notice.jpg https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2012-Aug-06-execution-of-MEA-order-to-return-passp ort.png

https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2011-April-21-in-CrlMP_2328-2010.png https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2018-May-30_proof_all_documents_submitted.jpg https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2018-Aug-28_signed-reply-to-the-illegal-show-cause-n otice.jpg

t

arbitrariness of the High Court of Madras's dismissal orders which were the subject matter of appeal, as they were based on the witness statements before the State police and disregarded the sworn statements made by various witnesses directly before the Courts in USA and India.

+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | | court order¹⁸—SPH was denied this basic legal | | | safeguard. | | | | | | The arbitrary denial of passport renewal forced | | | SPH into exile, stripping Him of state protection | | | and hindering His humanitarian mission. | | | | | | This targeted measure reflects a broader pattern | | | of persecution, denying SPH fundamental rights | | | while failing to uphold India's obligations under | | | international human rights law.¹⁹ | +=================+====================================================+ | November 2019 | The Gujarat State government Child Welfare | | | Commission (CWC) raided KAILASA’s Hindu female | | | monastery and molested the children. The only | | | women's monastery and Hindu University was | +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------+

demolished. Parents of the children collectively filed a POCSO case against the Child Welfare Committee (CWC), seeking accountability for the ongoing abuse and threats their children experienced during CWC raids.

International human rights lawyers such as:

Recently, the Honorable Gujarat High Court

- Mr. Geoffrey Robertson, KC, former jurist on the United Nations

exonerated and dismissed all charges in the false

Justice Council

“kidnapping” Gujarat case against SPH fomented

- Ms. Malliha Wilson, served as the Assistant Deputy Attorney General

by anti-Hindu forces. 22

of the Government of Ontario for 8 years

16●FeMbr.uDarayvid MattTash2e3

Hindumisic extremists targeted and attacked the

20●21Mr. Jeff Willis24indigenous education of the AIAT and the core of

- Mr. Mark WerkKsmAIaLnA²⁵SA’s lineage and succession by systematically

- Ms. María Doloerleims iMnaiñtionganthdeMGsu. rGua-dbirsiecilpaleOvsiuecdcoePsseirohnavinectr²a⁶ ditional kingdoms like the ancient Thondaimandala

As well as internationaaldhuemenaanmri.ghts advocates such as:

- The Ecumenical Commission of Human Rights (CEDHU)²⁷ 24●FeTbhreuaMryission ScAanlabArminbi ansasa(MdoSrCo)2f8 KAILASA and Hindu Nun, H.E. 20●23Mr. Carlos ReyVeisjaVyalperniyzauelNa iBthoylaívnarn29da, made an official public

statement at the UN on the ongoing persecution of

Gave their legal opinSioPnHs saunmd mKaArIiLzAinSgAth, awthtihceh psrpoasrekceudtioan oufnSprPeHcehdaesnted turned into persecutiboanc. klash of more than 1,000 media stories globally,

delegitimizing SPH and KAILASA’s statehood.

November 3, KAILASA established bilateral relations with two

212h0tt2ps3://drive.google.com/filme/du/1nki1c3iqpxatAlDiti7ejRsNd7oiyf ejUP4a1rmapg8Auna0yh.ibeET/hviiesw?umspo=vsheares_lpinak rked a

22 https://drive.google.com/filew/did/1eabslpp1r3eMaZdmXmaWegdni8a2LbRakgcGkmlaKsEhmHaWctrPoSssUs/vtihewe?ugsplo=sbheareb_ylinkbig

23 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PYP-kJ7bUe9SbqS9gUPMfs4SLuM8swPY/view?usp=share_link

24 https://drive.google.com/fileH/din/1dPYu0pzhQo2_b-iycydem9RekdTiBardPh5oIMuks8efrs869stnu/cvihew?ausspF=sohxareN_lienkws, The

25 https://drive.google.com/fiGle/ud/a1rrKdoia1wnV, t1Bf8Bc8Cf9,_ACDB8YCroaCqpatenTaOd1aSk, -/rveiefwe?rursipn=gshatroe_lSinkPH as

²⁶Specialists in Human Rights and Human Mobility

https://drive.google.com/drive“/Nu/i0t/hfoyldaenrsa/1nzedza1,O8faF9cain64gG7mLFuolhtijp-elGef8ckThSa9rJg4eY5sJ in India” and “a

²⁷ https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1xGcOHll7AeXdrLyQR2mzvoDNLOoxNlF8

²⁸ Mission Scalabriniana (MSC) is part of the Congregation of Missionary Sisters of St. Charles Borromeo

- Scalabrinianas, an organiziantiodnigfoeunndoeudsinnPaiatcioennz,a,aIstalay, b“yficMtoionsnearalt cJuoaunnBtaruyt.is”ta Scalabrini, in the year 1895. Its mission is to welcome, promote, protect and integrate migrant and refugee populations. It is present in 27 countries.

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1CX7izIoKQiKyjv_PONRpLuyfhmE24IIw

²⁹ Professor at the Andean University Simón https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1fvALF1OFAzAKHq4_SXDrYZ643OjOA2sm

11 medical experts from Ohio, California, Michigan, Canada and India after reviewing SPH's medical reports, have unequivocally concluded that SPH's inherent medical condition renders him physically incapable of committing rape³⁰. Additionally, verifiable strong evidence provides proof of a false rape accusation.³¹

Extradition Abuse, India, 2019

Despite intense pressure from the deep state, the Karnataka Police refused to falsely declare SPH as an absconder, citing no legal basis and warning that courts would dismiss such a baseless claim.

Undeterred, the deep state then pushed the Gujarat Police to pursue the matter, but the court demanded an Interpol report, which revealed that Interpol had rejected the request as politically motivated and incompatible with human rights principles.

The court subsequently rebuked the Gujarat Police, exposing the malicious intent. This reaffirmed SPH’s status as a protected religious leader and highlighted the abuse of legal processes against him.

³⁰https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/tree/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusatio

n/expert%20opinion%20by%20medical%20experts

³¹https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/blob/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusatio

n/Top%2010%20false%20claims%20of%20false%20rape%20accuser%20with%20datewise%20proofs% 20of%20contradictions%20proving%20his%20innocence.pdf

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

The Denial of Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) in India³²

The Dhyanapeeta Charitable Trust, established in 2001, promotes yoga, spirituality, and social welfare through initiatives like free food distribution, medical camps, and disaster relief.

It received FCRA registration in 2006, renewed in 2016, allowing it to accept foreign funds.

FCRA Denial & Legal Violations

- 2021 renewal application was denied in 2024. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) rejected renewal citing Sections 12(4)(e) and 12(4)(f)(iii) of the FCRA, claiming "public interest" concerns and alleged ties to its founder, SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam (who retired as trustee in 2016).

- No pending cases exist against current trustees, making the denial legally questionable.

- The government provided no prior notice or opportunity to respond, violating natural justice.

- A fresh FCRA application in 2024 was initially marked "granted" but later denied under false claims of missing documents, despite the Trust’s compliance.

Broader Context of FCRA Misuse

- The 2025 USCIRF report highlights India’s misuse of FCRA to target NGOs, religious minorities, and human rights groups.

- Over 20,000 FCRA registrations have been canceled since 2012, indicating systemic suppression.

³² https://drive.google.com/file/d/172z8MPD1_-foQR7wqKta9Yd4gdukAfF3/view?usp=sharing

Impact on the Trust

- Frozen bank accounts have stopped critical projects (temples, free food services, medical camps).

- The Trust, with a 20-year clean record, is now challenging the denial in the Karnataka High Court.

Legal Challenge

The Trust has filed a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court.

Property Seizures and Temple Destruction

State agencies have systematically targeted KAILASA properties through:

- Illegal property seizures including ancient temple complexes in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and other states

- Forced demolition of monastery buildings despite High Court stay orders

- Clandestine bureaucratic orders issued without due process

KAILASA: Guardians of Sacred Temple Lands and Protectors of Wildlife Sanctuaries in Rajapalayam and Seithur, India

[]

33

The temple ecosystem serves as the gateway to this realization.

³³ https://www.youtube.com/shorts/B7nGniQhVWQ

KAILASA, under the leadership of SPH, is engaged in a critical effort to protect sacred temple lands in Rajapalayam and Seithur, India, from commercial exploitation.

These lands, designated as sanctuaries for elephants, agricultural zones, and spiritual reserves, embody the Hindu principle of Ahimsa (non-violence) and Dharma-based ecological balance.

However, they face imminent threat from proposed multiplex developments by private entities.

Despite recent incidents of elephants breaking boundaries—a natural behavior in their ancestral habitat—KAILASA maintains its commitment: “This is their land. Let them roam freely.”

[]

2003: Land Donation & Spiritual Foundation³⁴ ³⁵

[]

³⁴ [Seithur Gift Deed Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1de3Rz2JkHRqt2A8BKBSwD62RBknBycu2 [Samsigapuram Gift Deed Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1st/1aKhJt4epZSA3SBefeX6j8R_Ba0p8QuqM ³⁵ [Mahasaptayagam] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T1g2sFxt-MjwtRfFIXyRh7jkjDz1hWEa/view?usp=drivesdk

[Satsang Video] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1We64GSwQn1BHcMQbdH65zf_1q4x-SylB/view?usp=drivesdk [Padayatra] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rG0SATVfu-mFRffnTYGDWATl_KHU_1XH

[Organic Farm Inauguration] https://drive.google.com/file/d/16OaF5GAhLYa2GB219HRKZ9arb4UpCur-/view?usp=drive_link [Meditation hall inauguration] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HPJOEKikyFWH_96jWoKaHxOEdsUblaJv?usp=drive_link [Padayatra Photos] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12UGEKNkCs9zsxnDtdpF6VTEU0RMe7XqF?usp=drive_link [Meditation Program] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-T3DNzwPAAcvH-IUyGdN5B5-FnyJw9-s?usp=drive_link

[Meeting with Hindu Leaders] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jvKvqzmrJWMMvIf09SHLomu6poSueQT9?usp=drive_link [School Inauguration] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1OuzwcqBT2aeSSp_UJDMX7VaTj9nHrpAU

[Pongal Harvest Ritual] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KZCNfH4Q1L_XufJAAnq5BM7hQ1L2WIKw?usp=drive_link Construction of temple https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KZCNfH4Q1L_XufJAAnq5BM7hQ1L2WIKw?usp=drive_link

2010–2012: Legal Battles³⁶ ³⁷ ³⁸

[]

³⁶ [Samsigapuram Cancellation] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1ue-Xriy6D9CALlvsmyz_qWOFMh4V5I5r [Seithur Cancellation] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1NM BmP5gynpz5zTmeKXlKZThyccfHxh

[Property Seizure Attempts] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LcFKY5uRuZpkYRJmtSa943LdAJvATbrb?usp=drive_link [Property Seizure Attempts] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LcFKY5uRuZpkYRJmtSa943LdAJvATbrb?usp=drive_link

³⁷ [FIR Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1meTFWn5lmj_0oWCIxXIkpCZW1HOo48Xf/view?usp=drive_link

³⁸ [Not Press Memo] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nZOwKUw-UEtejiARypwYzsQMwmAYpk0a/view?usp=drive_link [Court Dismissal Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1cxUxmqSdwb3xUxQTmg93zIkGsyZGn3iV

2019-2024: Violent Attacks & Arson³⁹ ⁴⁰ ⁴¹ ⁴²

[]

³⁹ [2019 Attack Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1lZSJv5WwoOxXftublmupXzk-URPgT39l

⁴⁰ [2023 Lawsuit Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1wfABK01KgWWTjtw5b-LZ7TwsUWOLCJLJ

⁴¹ [O.S. No. 33/2024 Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Dv_nPr5bOgOorqQpTaKrS5r4BnIP7D_c [Police Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Njg_6zKHDSjzkNn-uNJSzxADNzjS3Yni [Police Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Njg_6zKHDSjzkNn-uNJSzxADNzjS3Yni

[Morning Threats Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1i_NIYCQ7tBkue-yJK7yfClepiCmL5RBR?usp=drive_link [Surekha’s Call Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tof3T4CDSNgLRimfHjrl-yiPN5cJcBZ5/view?usp=drive_link [Lady Sanyasis Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tCaQfzUtkFXgLcy5FtFyw4213Tbj0UbP?usp=drive_link [Post-Dawn Threats Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Ybg9VSl2VbzjDN8eZTlo7TZetH6bRA1m [Online Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Sr4-ZYIvRz39ZgNw2MDuphianfJcCYHz

[SP Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1jkHUyn9QSSyyEFKSPnpgGpiQeHoayFPH [Registered Mail Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1VRvJbtjh8nslVxxBv64v1p1dY8U405be

⁴² Chats with Murali Krishna, brother of DSP Preethi, reveal a sinister pattern of intimidation and manipulation. On June 28, he insisted “intervention” was mandatory

[June 28 Chat Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aJX4ilD5H0TUvNzNiYryKTE78Vrcz1Ga/view?usp=drive_link By September 24, he spread false news of arrests and bail - [September 24 Chat Evidence]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zIgkrEvfOkmRixnyaBmoc44Y-SQpot05/view?usp=drive_link followed by a September 30 attempt to broker a settlement

[September 30 Chat Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vHUE6Zq81rDbpalWAMs3NCmUl2y0bLXY/view?usp=drive_link

On October 3, he threatened property seizure, predating an illegal complaint and summons https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OoQLdTip7FGx2t35K8sp0xzrAxZ51eD4/view?usp=drive_link

These exchanges suggest a coordinated effort to undermine the trust, with police complicity a recurring theme. [Summons Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1DHkdv4c6vMs_l0eIR301V7hjyqsx5xaL [Deepa’s Inquiry Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/12lxKPVLpD6YxSo4TTMutNi0ygk_9A_ud [Sureka’s Inquiry Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1FWPyslw4VDvpkRz3lywGSf9ogweyNnbD [Summons]https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1DHkdv4c6vMs_l0eIR301V7hjyqsx5xaL

[Deepa’s Inquiry] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/12lxKPVLpD6YxSo4TTMutNi0ygk_9A_ud [Sureka’s Request] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1vBt8NWn-iO-YBJG6xZiFQ-0if34kquNG [Sureka’s Inquiry] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1FWPyslw4VDvpkRz3lywGSf9ogweyNnbD

[]

2025: State-Sanctioned Violence⁴³ ⁴⁴

[]

⁴³ [Police Demand Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1o64CzVPo3s9akurCSeUz5ePKurz_Xlpj [Order Received Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1R9Qk_6ShrTteUz61FQSl2CJVj25rnw8V

The detailed video evidences of the same captured by both Kailasa and the press are at (305) Persecution of KAILASA Rajapalayam and Seithur - YouTube.

The evidence—[Police Demand] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1o64CzVPo3s9akurCSeUz5ePKurz_Xlpj [Order Received] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1R9Qk_6ShrTteUz61FQSl2CJVj25rnw8V

[Court Stay Order on the Illegal Order of Sub Collector] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xDhmyleKuP2wjrzvVs9lxKgvn1X8WAkG/view?usp=drive_link

⁴⁴ Upon subsequent discovery of the order, it became evident that the mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 164 of the BNSS were disregarded. The provision explicitly requires an Executive Magistrate to:

1. Issue a reasoned written order specifying the grounds for action; and

2. Provide formal notice to affected parties, ensuring an opportunity to be heard.

The failure to adhere to these statutory obligations resulted in a denial of the Trust’s right to a fair hearing, rendering the order procedurally defective. This omission suggests either administrative negligence or a deliberate circumvention of due process, warranting judicial scrutiny.

The circumstances indicate a breach of fundamental legal principles, necessitating appropriate remedial action to rectify the denial of justice.

Indigenous Temple Land Grab - KAILASA Trishulam

KAILASA Trishulam, a Hindu monastery in Chennai, India, houses monks and nuns, including marginalized Dalit Hindu nuns.

[]

45

The authorities ordered the monks to vacate the monastery, stating that no protection would be provided, and refused to register formal complaints.

[]

46

⁴⁵ After the violence ended, officials from the Revenue Department Government of Tamil Nadu, Tahsildar from Tambaram Taluk, Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Pallavaram with a host of officials arrived, after much cry for help, a huge battalion of higher-ranking officials arrived.

⁴⁶Video evidence of rape https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na-JxwAfTvE

Indigenous Temple Land Grab - Adi Kailash, Karnataka

9 June 2012, Bengaluru, Chief Minister of Karnataka State - D V Sadananda Gowda, publicly announced⁴⁷ the State’s illegal⁴⁸ takeover of the privately owned temple monastery and the illegal arrest of SPH.49 50

⁴⁷The Chief Minister of the state of Karnataka came on television saying he would - ‘arrest The SPH in 2 days, close the monastery, teach The SPH a lesson’.

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/govt-orders-probe-against-swami-nithyananda-in-ranjitha-case- 105299-2012-06-11

⁴⁸ Shankarappa who is a legal expert gave his legal opinion on the matter as: “The chief minister's order is illegal, and he acted in haste.

The political head of the state has no power to order anyone's arrest as it is an infringement of an individual's rights.

It is unfortunate.. he seems to have surrendered himself to some vested interests. If anyone has a grievance, he should file a complaint.

Or police can take up a suo motu case and investigate what occurred in the ashram. Media reports cannot be the basis for any order”.

16 Jun 2012, Times Of India - CM’s order on Nithyananda’s arrest was improper - timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/CMs-order-on-Nityanandas-arrest-was-improper/articleshow/1 4164890.cms

⁴⁹ The Chief Minister made the following statements:

- “Bail of Nithyananda should be canceled and he should be arrested”, 11 June 2012 , NDTV , Bengaluru

ndtv.com/south/nithyananda-ashram-to-be-sealed-chief-minister-wants-him-arrested-487763

- “I have asked the district administrator to seize the Dhynapeeth Ashram of Nithyananda and recover all documents and arrest him immediately”,

- “I have asked the Police to file strong objections against his bail petition”.

14 Jun 2012, Firstpost Bengaluru, Sex, tantra and video tapes - chronicles of a ‘cool dude’ swamy - India News , Firstpost

- “The arrest of Nithyananda swami should be done as early as possible and a serious mechanism should be opted for this purpose. We received the report. The Law Minister, the Home Minister and the District minister along with officers we had detailed discussion and they decided to hold a high-level inquiry headed by the regional commissioner to look into the matter in detail’

11 Jun 2012, Newsx Video Clip, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3blhMe1CIE4 ; 11 Jun 2012 , The Hindu, Karnataka,

www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/karnataka-chief-minister-orders-arrest-of-nithyananda/article 3515274.ece

⁵⁰ He also said on June 11: "I have directed the investigators to frame a perfect charge sheet against Nithyananda and I will ensure that this is so. We do not encourage such immoral people in Karnataka, and I am going to make an example out of Nithyananda.”

16 Jun 2012, India Today,

indiatoday.in/magazine/nation/story/20120625-nithyananda-surrenders-in-court-sent-to-custody-758791-2 012-06-16

The Chief Minister of the State went to the extent of claiming that he was ready to face jail term but would not stop targeting The SPH Nithyananda Paramashivam.

15 Jun 2012, Times Of India, Sadananda takes on Nithyananda says he is ready to face jail term timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/sadananda-takes-on-nityananda-says-he-is-ready-to-face-jail-t erm/articleshow/14148461.cms

11 Jun 2012, 600 strong⁵¹ State police seizes temple property, seals the monastery, enforces curfew, displacing hundreds of residents.

[]

52

Indigenous Temple Land Grab - KAILASA Pavazhakundru

24 May 1994, a year before her death, Mata Vibhutananda Puri, coronated SPH as Her successor to the spiritual seat of Arunachala Sarvajnapeetham⁵³, Tiruvannamalai, by Guru Parampara (Guru lineage) from Isakki Swamigal, and gave the title “Brahmasukhi” through a formal initiation⁵⁴.

She built and gifted SPH a simple monastery in Pavazhakundru.⁵⁵

⁵¹https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/2012/jun/15/600-police-deployed-for-nithyanandas-

security-377299.html

⁵²09 Jun 2012, First Post,

https://www.firstpost.com/india/karnataka-govt-to-takeover-nithyanandas-ashram-337961.html ⁵³Sarvajnapeetha is the Peetha (seat of) Sarva (supreme most) Jñāna (knowledge) where Paramashiva sits and teaches to the world leading the entire humanity to the next breakthrough in spiritual research and development. It encompasses several spiritual-religious kingdoms and Hindu monasteries (Mutt).

⁵⁴25 May 1994, Coronation Deed from Mata Vibhutananda Puri for Arunachala Sarvajnapeetham https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wbF1hZIuJqxrWjhQfDQKoZVxVdmVlOb2/view

⁵⁵ Pavazhakundru is a sacred hillock in Tiruvannamalai where Devi Parashakti (primordial Hindu Mother Goddess) had Her enlightenment experience during one of Her incarnations on the planet earth.

Though SPH is the legal owner of the land⁵⁶, Tamil Nadu State Government has repeatedly prevented the monks and nuns of SPH from performing worship to the sacred hill.

Monks were forcibly evacuated by authorities beaten, tied and raped in front of the State Police by State-groomed Hindumesic forces of the DMK and CPI(M).

The Paramashiva Shila was vandalized and desecrated with footwear.

Indigenous Temple Land Grab - KAILASA Madurai Aadheenam

On 27 April 2012, SPH was coronated as the 293rd Pontiff of the Madurai Aadheenam, the world’s most ancient Shaivaite monastery⁵⁷.

This was extremely intolerable for the Hindumisic terrorists, who made more than eight vexatious litigations to dethrone SPH⁵⁸.

[]

Pavalakundru is also where SPH had His first enlightenment experience upon the Paramashiva Shila, the sacred rock, which is worshipped today as a Deity.

⁵⁶ Tiruvannamalai Town, Village number 236, III-1, 2, land area number 526,523,523 as per State Revenue records. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GPyHDMkyQ968TBYSdg4hCxvy4iK78Cgk/view

⁵⁷ https://kailaasa.org/kailasa-history/

⁵⁸OS 1000/2012, WP 6607/.2012, WP 8260/2012, WP 9648/2012, WP 12915/2012, WP 13751/2012, OS

83/2012, OS 621/2012

In response, they conspired against SPH, launching numerous assassination attempts⁵⁹ and initiating a prolonged campaign of legal harassment—a lawfare that continues to this day.

SPH was unconstitutionally and illegally prohibited by the High Court of Madras from entering Madurai Aadheenam of which He is the 293rd successor.⁶⁰

Though the order itself violates the constitution, Justice Mahadevan upheld the decision and even threatened SPH that he would order the arrest of SPH if SPH did not resign from His responsibility as the successor.⁶¹

⁵⁹ - 29 May 2012 - A mob of 100 anti-Hindu atheistic militants, who opposed the appointment of the SPH as the 293rd Pontiff of Madurai Aadheenam, came to mob lynch the SPH when he was at his Kanjanur Agneeshwara temple residence.

- The next day on 30 May 2012, the SPH was leaving the city of Kanjanur when again a mob of anti-Hindu atheistic militants attacked, disciples of the SPH were assaulted^(#) in front of the police.

- 2 February 2018, when an explosive arson attack was carried out against SPH at the Madurai Meenakshi Temple. The blast caused significant damage, destroying a section of the temple and leading to the collapse of a 600-foot stretch of stone from the 3,000-year-old sacred structure.

⁶⁰https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/madras-hc-warns-of-issuing-arrest-warrant-against-self-

styled-godman-nithyananda/articleshow/62692301.cms https://indiankanoon.org/doc/651773/

https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2012-Feb-23-CC204_order-to-return-passport.pdf https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/2018-Aug-24_illegal_mea_notice_without_even_signa ture.jpg

⁶¹ As per the Constitution of India, a person is to be treated as innocent until proven guilty, and no one has the right to pass judgment on such a person. SPH has never been implicated in any crime. Yet against the very constitution of the country, He has repeatedly been treated in a prejudicial manner as assumed guilty. Justice Mahadevan went on to pass an order blatantly violating the fundamental rights of SPH and against the very tenets of natural law and justice and on record said, "Who permitted you to record court proceedings? To whom were you sending-message about the proceeding? Don't think that this court is a playground. I will see that your ashram is vanished. Hundreds of complaints are pending against the ashram."

Right from 2012, SPH was stopped from performing the essential religious rituals of the Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple, such as the Kumbha Abhishekham³⁵⁹, which happens only once in several years and is one of the primary responsibilities of the Gurumahasannidhanam, who is the incarnation of Paramashiva, to directly supervise and perform. https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/Order_to_Crp.(PD)(MD)_818-of-2018_and_CMP(MD)

_3630-of-2018_Madurai_Bench_Madras_High_Court_dated_10-July-2018-(CRP_OS_1000).pdf https://www.news18.com/news/india/we-worship-shiva-he-behaves-like-shiva-madurai-mutt-retorts-after-f ugitive-nithyananda-claims-top-post-4100630.html

Indigenous Temple Land Grab - The Four Mutts

In 2014, SPH was formally appointed⁶² as Pontiff, the spiritual and legal head (Madadhipati) by the previous Pontiff, Swami Sri Atmananda, through four official nomination deeds.⁶³

Hindumesic state backed elements with vested interests—who had previously been benefiting from the properties owned by the mutts—conspired to remove SPH from his rightful position as Madadhipati.

Their objective was to seize control and misuse the land, valuable assets and heritage of these historic religious institutions.

To achieve this, they actively illegally obstructed the disciples of SPH from taking over the administration of the mutts.

As part of their efforts, they initiated false legal action seeking an order to prohibit SPH and His representatives from entering and managing the monastery premises.⁶⁴

[]

⁶²https://www.nithyananda.org/news/paramahamsa-nithyananda-mathadhipati-four-ancient-mutts-south-in

dia-says-high-court-madras#gsc.tab=0

⁶³ These appointments included leadership of the following traditional temples and monasteries:

- Sri Somanatha Swami Temple & Aadheenam, Thiruvarur

- Sri Arunachala Gnandesikar Swami Temple & Mutt, Vedaranyam

- Sri Po.Ka. Sadhukkal Mutt, Vedaranyam

- Sri Palasamy Mutt, Thanjavur

- Sri Sankara Swami Mutt, Thanjavur

⁶⁴ https://nithyanandatruth.org/aadheenam/four-mutts/

International Scope of Persecution - Transnational Repression

The persecution of SPH and KAILASA has extended beyond India's borders, with documented cases of harassment and detention of KAILASA monastic members.

Illegal Detention, Torture, and Religious Persecution of Female Monks in Equatorial Guinea⁶⁵

An Ambassador of KAILASA, Ma Vijayapriya Nithyananda, and Ma Nithya Shivamayananda went to Equatorial Guinea (EG) to establish humanitarian services under a treaty signed by EG’s Vice President and authenticated by the embassy of EG in Congo, the Attorney General and high-level officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

After over a year in the country, they faced false accusations of falsified documents and endured 36 days of illegal detention, torture, and human rights abuses by EG’s National Gendarmerie.

⁶⁵ Full report and evidences: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Gc7lrsbln4jQFCSQTLDQdG3dFcvZkOaJ?usp=drive_link

1. Illegal Arrest & Detention

[]

2. Physical & Psychological Torture

[]

3. Inhumane Prison Conditions

[]

4. Legal & Religious Rights Violations

[]

5. Coerced Video Statement & Extortion

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

The Systemic Persecution & Obstruction of Hindu Religious Celebration in The Gambia

In February-March 2025, a coordinated campaign targeted the Kumbh Mela, the largest peace congregation on earth⁶⁶, in The Gambia organized by a female monk of the Sovereign Order of KAILASA’s Nithyananda.

The deep state of India, using local proxies, spread disinformation, hate speech, and threats to suppress it, reflecting a wider trend against indigenous Hindu groups.

⁶⁶ https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/kumbh-mela-01258

Key Acts of Persecution

[]

Evidence of Deep State Involvement⁶⁷

[]

⁶⁷ Whatsapp message - Indian consul, Ram Mohan, mentioning that KAILASA is on red corner https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ShDptfM4NdkcvyXOeJIJpoP0xd1vQsdm/view?usp=drive_link 01.19.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan mentioning that KAILASA institution is on a red corner alert https://drive.google.com/file/d/1166RV0mfZON9mEN0i83l1ApUjQdU5HP5/view?usp=drive_link 01.02.2023 Voice recording - Sakshi received a threatening phone call from Ram Mohan https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bpgra64ZKX1WIm3OfYhp1h-qVBCbjkno/view?usp=drive_link 02.03.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan gave threat message to Sakshi https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VymJeZq_x_wIq0jcFneNRKEegeExz9pS/view?usp=drive_link 02.04.2025 Voice recording - Out of fear backed off from offering swimming pool & financial support https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NBBE3LJDFBayklGSFZeFSYvwu46BNESn/view?usp=drive_link 02.03.2025 Voice recording - Nandu telling to cancel Kumbh Mela https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xchNiwmr_-Mq69gmnM3-BdWO5P_JE2r4/view?usp=drive_link 02.04.2025 Voice recording - Nandu telling to cancel Kumbh Mela

https://drive.google.com/file/d/12-RCxt-mENamrktKOMbFLdtwgqYdhpLU/view?usp=drive_link 02.11.2025 Voice recording - 2nd attempt - new whatsApp group Kumbh to Mahadev https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t0rEyzxHW7y0_TQrBg_COOjrTmkbEHN4/view?usp=drive_link

03.13.2025 Voice recording of Sanju Ram Mohan meeting with Indian group and said Indian passport will be cancelled https://drive.google.com/file/d/18T9zxOqX5uzO1urNSQy2WSY8XBYQgxqq/view?usp=drive_link

03.14.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan said he received a letter from the Government of India who will cancel the passports of participants of the Kumbh Mela

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iNGK-FaoErnZTyMC3JNru8jDBDmjAuu1/view?usp=drive_link

Persecution of Indigenous Monastics in Bolivia

[]

[]

Persecution of Male Monks (March 20, 2025, Beni Department)⁶⁸

[]

⁶⁸ https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1C_PELd5F1QUqBRVKDxo8cNBJxguZR3C1

Persecution of Female Monks (March 21–23, 2025, Santa Cruz & La Paz)⁶⁹

[]

⁶⁹ Audio testimonial Ma Lok Teng Lung (Guruprasadini): https://drive.google.com/file/d/12qqSKfvwezLsk-LGxLMN39KL4OZ4-QqR/view?usp=drive_link Evidence of abduction from their residence and illegal detention at immigration https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1O8J_e5dSnuNLiZuoIZrNrPmor6XPxEZD

Abduction from La Paz international airport and dumped at the Peru-Bolivian border https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/12HeNl4RcFQTKXbb_FhD84nohqcgqxjes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVSX_fmPslc

Legal & Human Rights Violations

[]

Over 100⁷⁰ racist, anti-indigenous media outlets⁷¹ in Bolivia, India, USA and others accused KAILASA of exploiting indigenous lands by coercing Indigenous nations into signing agreements, despite legally ratified, notarized and protocolized agreements, and obtaining written community consent prior to the execution of any given agreement,⁷² in line with Bolivia’s constitutional right to self-determination.⁷³

⁷⁰ https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1rdmintiugyCBdqG3BfQ3G8fzNc3Js8Lw

⁷¹ Such as El Deber and Ana Bolivia as well as India outlets like Times Now, TV9, Zee Tamil news, News Minute and Republic World

⁷² Despite facing persecution fueled by Hinduphobic rhetoric, racial discrimination, and anti-indigenous agendas propagated by certain political and media factions, Bolivia's indigenous communities remain steadfast in their alliance with KAILASA, continuing to uphold their partnership with resolute solidarity.

⁷³ Articles 30.2:

In the framework of the unity of the State, and in accordance with this Constitution, the nations and rural native indigenous peoples enjoy the following rights:

- To self-determination and territoriality.

- To the collective ownership of land and territories.

- To the practice of their political, juridical and economic systems in accord with their world view.

They launched hate speech once again by falsely labeling KAILASA as a “fictional nation” and defaming SPH as a “self-proclaimed god-man.

Lack of UN Response

Despite extensive documentation of human rights violations, the United Nations has failed to take meaningful action to protect SPH and KAILASA from this systematic persecution.

The UN has failed to respond to KAILASA’s repeated appeals to the UNHCR for the international protection of SPH and other Hindu Monks. Despite overwhelming evidence of persecution, there has been no response—even after more than five years.

This inaction directly contradicts the UN's mandate to protect religious minorities and prevent transnational repression.

Accountability Gaps at All Levels

National Level Failures

I⭲dia⭲ a"ťkoíiťics ka:c dcmo⭲sťíaťcd sQsťcmaťic rail"ícs i⭲:

- I⭲:csťigaťi⭲g rabíicaťcd ckaígcs dcspiťc clcaí c:idc⭲cc or co⭲spiíacQ

- Píoťccťi⭲g ícligio"s mi⭲oíiťics ríom mob :iolc⭲cc a⭲d sťaťc-spo⭲soícd pcíscc"ťio⭲

- To autonomous indigenous territorial management, and to the exclusive use and exploitation of renewable natural resources existing in their territory without prejudice to the legitimate rights acquired by third parties.

Article 289: Rural native indigenous autonomy consists in self-government as an exercise of free determination of the nations and rural native indigenous peoples, the population of which shares territory, culture, history, languages, and their own juridical, political, social and economic organization or institutions.

- E⭲s"íi⭲g j"dicial i⭲dcpc⭲dc⭲cc ríom poliťical i⭲ťcírcíc⭲cc

- Píc:c⭲ťi⭲g ťía⭲s⭲aťio⭲al ícpícssio⭲ bQ sťaťc agc⭲ťs

Local Government Complicity

Local and state agencies have actively participated in persecution through:

- Police complicity in mob attacks on monasteries and temples

- Bureaucratic harassment through illegal orders and property seizures

- Denial of basic services including banking and educational facilities

- Selective enforcement of laws to target religious minorities

International Accountability Vacuum

The international community has failed to:

- Respond to systematic religious persecution despite extensive documentation

- Investigate transnational repression by Indian state agents

- Protect stateless persons such as SPH forced into exile

- Prevent coordinated attacks on religious institutions across multiple jurisdictions

Specific Responses to UN Human Rights Council Questions

Capacity Building for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

The persecution of SPH and KAILASA demonstrates the complete absence of human rights-based approaches in local and regional government operations.

Instead of capacity building for rights realization, authorities have systematically:

- Denied indigenous Hindu educational rights by forcibly closing KAILASA’s Gurukuls

- Violated the human right to adequate housing through illegal property seizures and demolitions

- Restricted religious freedom by barring access to temples and monasteries

- Denied healthcare access during detention and persecution

Engagement with UN Human Rights Mechanisms

The persecution of SPH and KAILASA reveals systematic non-engagement with UN human rights mechanisms:

- Failure to implement UPR recommendations on religious minority protection

- Non-cooperation with Special Procedures seeking information on persecution

- Absence of meaningful National Mechanisms for Implementation, Reporting and Follow-ups (NMIRFs) that include minority voices

- Deliberate obstruction of international human rights monitoring

Inter-governmental Coordination

The coordinated persecution across multiple India states demonstrates negative coordination aimed at rights violations rather than protection:

- Multi-state conspiracy to target religious minorities

- Shared intelligence for persecution purposes

- Coordinated media campaigns to spread disinformation

- Joint legal harassment across jurisdictions

Challenges and Recommendations

Critical Challenges

- Deep state capture of law enforcement and judicial institutions

- Systematic impunity for human rights violations

- Weaponization of counter-terrorism laws against religious minorities

- Coordinated transnational repression by state agents

Urgent Recommendations

1. UN intervention to protect SPH as an internationally protected person

2. UN recognition of the United States of KAILASA as a sovereign nation to protect the rights, safety, and cultural heritage of the persecuted religious and indigenous Hindu minority community, in alignment with international law and the UN Charter

3. Establishment of independent investigation mechanisms into systematic persecution

4. Sanctions against state agents engaged in transnational repression

5. Strengthening of local accountability mechanisms with international oversight

6. Implementation of effective complaint procedures for religious minorities

Conclusion

The systematic persecution of SPH and KAILASA represents a paradigmatic case of state capture and institutional failure at all levels of government.

The complete absence of accountability mechanisms, coupled with active participation by local and state agencies in persecution, demonstrates the

urgent need for international intervention and strengthened human rights protection systems.

The UN's failure to respond meaningfully to this documented persecution undermines its credibility and effectiveness in protecting religious minorities worldwide.

Without immediate action to address these accountability gaps, the international human rights system risks becoming complicit in systematic persecution through inaction.

The evidence presented in this report demands urgent attention from the international community, including the establishment of independent investigation mechanisms, targeted sanctions against perpetrators, and strengthened protection for religious minorities facing systematic persecution.

Only through decisive action can the UN fulfill its mandate to protect human rights and prevent the normalization of state-sponsored persecution.

The United States of KAILASA⁷⁴

The Juridical Statehood of KAILASA

Historical Context - Illegal Annexation of Indigenous Hindu Sovereign Lands

⁷⁴ The United States of KAILASA is the First Sovereign State for Hindus re-established by The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam, Ecclesiastical Head of two billion Hindus worldwide. Unlike any other modern nation, KAILASA provides a base for the revival, preservation, and central administration of Hinduism, similar to the Vatican, which serves as a central administration hub for the Roman Catholic Church.

The Sovereign Order of KAILASA's Nithyananda is an atypical government, simultaneously functioning as the supreme governing body of Hinduism and a sovereign entity under international law.

This mirrors the unique status of The Holy See, which is an atypical government as well, as it serves as both the supreme governing body of the Catholic Church and a sovereign entity under international law. https://kailaasa.org/

At the time of British withdrawal from India in 1947, the Indian subcontinent officially comprised 565 independent indigenous Hindu sovereign princely states.⁷⁵

Among these was the Surangi Kingdom.⁷⁶

Despite the "Instrument of Accession" preserving their sovereignty in theory⁷⁷, these states faced forced annexation after ceding their territories, resulting in the unlawful stripping of their autonomous status.

Moreover, the Hindu rulers of these states were enticed into compliance with promises of a personal "privy purse"⁷⁸ ⁷⁹—a financial incentive later revoked unilaterally⁸⁰—leading them to compromise their traditional Hindu values and constitutional integrity.

Such annexation by force and inducement through corruption contravenes international law, violating principles enshrined in various legal frameworks and customary international norms.⁸¹

⁷⁵ Bhargava, R. P. (1991), The Chamber of Princes, Northern Book Centre, pp. 312–323, ISBN 978-81-7211-005-5

⁷⁶ (i) Dr. Henry Soszynski - Study of Orissa estates during the 19th century http://members.iinet.net.au/~royalty/ips/misc/orissa_estates.html, research showing that Surangi was recognised as an independent princely state by the British Government ruled by the “Raja” (KING) (ii) https://www.indianrajputs.com/view/surangi

⁷⁷The template "Instrument of Accession" mentioned, "Nothing in this Instrument affects the continuance of my sovereignty in and over this State, or, save as provided by or under this Instrument, the exercise of any powers, authority and rights now enjoyed by me as Ruler of this state or the validity of any law at present in force in this State." White Paper of Indian States (1950) Ministry of States, Government of India, Instrument of Accession, Appendix VII, point 8, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/White_Paper_on_Indian_States_(1950)/Part_4/Instrument_of_Accession

⁷⁸https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_Purse_in_India

⁷⁹ The privy purse itself was unilaterally abolished by the Indian Government, invoking the conditions of fraud (article 49 VCLT) and that of "termination or suspension of the operation of a treaty as a consequence of its breach" (article 60) of the VCLT.

⁸⁰ The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) 1969 clearly states as grounds for invalidity of a treaty to include: Restrictions on authority to express the consent of a State (article 49 VCLT); Corruption of a representative of a State (article 50 VCLT); Coercion of a State by the threat or use of force. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf

⁸¹Article 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text ; The International Law Commission (ILC) https://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/1_14.shtml ; Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf ; The Hague Regulations and Geneva Conventions (i) https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/hague/en/docs/hague_system_regulations.pdf, https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/adopt_ref/hague-convention-text.html

[]

82 83 84 85 86 87 88

⁸²Tiwari, Aaditya (30 October 2017). "Sardar Patel – Man who United India". pib.gov.in.

⁸³Lumby, E. W. R. 1954. The Transfer of Power in India, 1945–1947. London: George Allen & Unwin. p. 228

⁸⁴https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_of_Accession

⁸⁵ The "Instrument of Accession" between the Hindu Kings and the Dominion of India was contrary to the Hindu law that governed these Kingdoms, as these kings were merely the stewards of the presiding Deity, having no authority to accede their kingdoms to a non-Hindu entity.

⁸⁶https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_India_Act_1935

⁸⁷ Through the 42^(nd) Amendment in 1976 in the Constitution of India, this stand was further reasserted with the addition of the word “Secular” to the Preamble of the Constitution of India, thereby further distancing India (Bharat) to its original form as a Hindu nation. This amendment, in spirit, further dissociated India (Bharat) from all religious duties and identities of a Hindu Kingdom, unlike how it always was during its history of more than 10,000 years.

⁸⁸ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India)

KAILASA is a sovereign subject of international law-possessing distinctive attributes, from SPH’s inheritance of the unbroken succession and the revival of 21 ancient Hindu sovereign states and ecclesiastical historical institutions.⁸⁹ ⁹⁰

[]

91

⁸⁹Surya Vamsa Surangi Samrajya Sarvajnapeetha, Suvarnapeetha Swargapura Samrajya Sarvajnapeetha, Shyamala Peetha Sarvajnapeetha

⁹⁰ In addition, Kanchi KAILASA Sarvajnapeetha and seventeen sovereign Sanatana Hindu ecclesiastical historical institutions receive customary recognition by the UN as per the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

⁹¹https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_1_1961.pdf

Doctrine of Continuity

[]

92

KAILASA government-in-exile⁹³ - In 2003, SPH relocated KAILASA government-in-exile to Los Angeles, California.

⁹² Historical examples dating back to the eighteenth century include cases like Portugal and Genoa and instances of state re-establishment after the Vienna Congress of 1815. More recent examples, such as Poland, Ethiopia, Czechoslovakia, Albania, and Austria during and after World War II, serve as other modern instances of state re-establishment, offering additional evidence to recognize and preserve a state's legal personality over time.

⁹³ The Thondaimandalam Sannidhanam Government in Exile was established in 1947, immediately following India's partition.

This significant event occurred when India gained independence from British colonial rule but was divided into two separate countries: India and Pakistan.

During decolonization, Hindu indigenous traditions and culture were targeted, leading to concerns about preserving the indigenous enlightened civilization. In response, the Government in Exile was formed to protect and promote Hindu heritage.

In 1988, in concurrence with the 68th Jagadguru Shankaracharya of Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, the 230th Guru Mahasannidhanam of Kanchi KAILASA Thondaimandala Sarvajnapeetha formally appointed The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam as its spiritual and administrative leader, ensuring the continuation of unbroken Hindu lineages. The 68th Kanchi Shankaracharya had this vision for a long time which was revealed in his 1920 letter to the League of Nations.

The enforced disappearance of one of the Sannidhanams during decolonization highlights the challenges faced by Hindu institutions. Understanding this history informs strategies for addressing contemporary challenges and preserving Hindu traditions.

[]

By the doctrine of continuity⁹⁴ legal facts in the context of the history of the Hindu sovereign State of the Surangi Kingdom, SPH derives all sovereign rights and powers of the royal lineage as the Sovereign from His inheritance and continuation of the unbroken succession of the Surangi Kingdom.⁹⁵ ⁹⁶ ⁹⁷

⁹⁴ The Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties (1978) (https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/3_2_1978.pdf) addresses aspects of the Doctrine of Continuity by outlining how treaty obligations are handled during state succession.

In international customary law, the 'Principle of Continuity of States' (Doctrine of Continuity) implies that upheavals and revolutions within a country, changes in government, territorial adjustments, measures taken during military occupation, or other internal transformations do not negate the existence of the country, do not affect the legal personality and international obligations of the state.

⁹⁵ The Surangi Kingdom, through unification with 20 other sovereign Hindu States and sovereign ecclesiastical, historical entities, became part of the United States KAILASA, which thus became a Sovereign independent juridical state, with SPH as the Sovereign.

⁹⁶ As per the doctrine of continuity, these facts imply that the legitimacy of KAILASA manifests as a natural outcome of historical legal facts without mandating the need for further validation, confirmation, or support from other nations.

⁹⁷ While the territory of the Surangi Kingdom was annexed unlawfully, KAILASA has no territorial conflict with the Republic of India or any other nation and does not claim any territorial rights over its erstwhile territories.

Doctrine of Acquired Rights⁹⁸ ⁹⁹ ¹⁰⁰ ¹⁰¹

[]

⁹⁸Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties art. 70(1)(b), May 23, 1969, available at https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf, provides that the termination of an international treaty "does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties created through the execution of the treaty prior to its termination," and that the concerned parties created through the treaty continue to possess their respective acquired rights.

⁹⁹ For instance, the Permanent Court of International Justice held in its Advisory Opinion on the German Settlers in Poland (1923) that "Private rights acquired under existing law do not cease on a change of sovereignty." As per the United Nations International Law Commission, these statements of the Permanent Court clearly show that, in the event of a territorial change, an international obligation exists to respect the rights of private individuals acquired under the legislation previously in force.

¹⁰⁰ International Law Commission, Documents of the eleventh session, including the report of the Commission to the General Assembly, Fourth report on State Responsibility by Mr. F. V. Garcia-Amador, Special Rapporteur Document A/CN.4/119 on State responsibility. https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_119.pdf

¹⁰¹Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Collection of Advisory Opinions, series B, No. 6, Settlers of German Origin in Territory ceded by Germany to Poland, pp. 36 and 38. See also other statements of the Court in Collection of Judgments, series A, No. 2, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions case, p. 28, and series A, No. 7, Case concerning certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia, pp. 22 and 42

Rights of the Deity and legal principles of Divine Sovereignty

Divine Sovereignty is universally recognized¹⁰² and temple Deities owning property is a well-established legal principle.¹⁰³

In Hindu Temples where the Deity is the owner of the temple and attached properties, the Presiding Deity of the Hindu Kingdom is the Sovereign of the Kingdom.

¹⁰² Around 1976, a case of deity theft was filed in the UK court. The suing entity was a juristic person, which was a Hindu Deity. The case involved the repatriation of a stolen Nataraja Deities to India, which had been stolen in the autumn of 1976 from the Aril Thiru Viswanatha Swamy Thanjavur district, Tamil Nadu.

The Indian Government sued Bumper Development Corporation (BDC) and the metropolitan police as co-defendants. The case was fought by a Queen's Counsel, Adrian Hamilton, assisted by the persuasive Bhaskar Ghorpade, barrister-at-law. The Indian Government argued that "once a deity, always a deity. An idol remains a juristic person however long buried or damaged, since the deity and its juristic entity survive the total destruction of its earthly form." The judge concluded that a juristic entity with a title to the Nataraja is superior to that of the defendant. The case set a precedent for regaining stolen temple Deities. It marked the first time a Hindu Deity (embodied form of God as per Hinduism) was recognized as a juristic person in a UK court.

https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/international/story/19880315-indian-government-wins-stolen-nataraja- idol-case-in-british-court-797028-1988-03-14

These case references illustrate that the Hindu Law and principles related to Deity Rights and Divine Sovereignty are recognized in Common English Law, not just in some jurisdictions. Also, given the fact that these principles are recognized in Common English Law and applied before Colonization (in Hindu kingdoms under the Hindu constitution), during the colonial era (under Common English Law), and afterward under Indian (which also upholds these principles as illustrated with different case laws), it is clear that these principles are universal and undisputed.

¹⁰³ These concepts and principles in India are primarily governed by Hindu law and various judgments by the Supreme Court and High Courts.

One of the landmark cases that dealt with Deities being juristic persons capable of owning property is the case of "Ram Jankijee Deities vs State Of Bihar & Ors (1999) 5 SCC 50". In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that Hindu idols are juristic entities and have the legal status of a minor under the guardianship of the managing trustee or priest of the temple. Implying that the Deity, as a juristic person, can own property, sue, and be sued in court. The property in question is held in trust for the Deity, and the managing trustee or the priest acts on behalf of the deity.

The King of a Hindu nation was a mere regent of the Lord¹⁰⁴, similarly to how the executive officers of the temples are mere servants¹⁰⁵ of the presiding Deity.

Additionally, non-Hindu practitioners cannot be trustees, executive officers, or personnel in the Hindu temples¹⁰⁶, and therefore, non-Hindus entities

¹⁰⁴ For example, Marthanda Varma, King of Padmanabhapuram, Kingdom of Travancore, in December 1749, declared and dedicated the kingdom to the presiding Deity, Sri Padmanabha, and subsequently assumed the title Padmanabha Dasa (the servant of Lord Padmanabhan). This act is known as Thripadidanam, which meant that the kingdom became the property of Padmanabhaswamy. Since then, the kingdom's sovereign has been the temple's Deity, while the head of the royal family ruled on the Deity’s behalf as guardian and pre-eminent servant (Padmanabha Dasa). Since that day, Travancore has not belonged to any one person or the royal family but to the Lord. The kings merely ruled as vassals of agents of the Deity. Marthanda Varma’s last words to his successor, Rama Varma, were, “No deviation whatever should be made in regard to the dedication of the Kingdom to Sri Padmanabhaswamy, and all further territorial acquisitions should be made over to the Devasom.”

¹⁰⁵ The Executive Officers are mere servants of the Deity.

In “State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. V. Pujari Utthan Avam Kalyan Samiti & Anr”, (2021) SC 4245, AIR 2021 SC 690, (dated September 6, 2021, available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122592345/), the Supreme court ruled that the presiding Deity owns all temple property as a legal person and the name of neither the District Collector (State District Executive) nor the Pujari (priest) be put in the property ownership papers(Revenue records). Paragraph 27 of the judgment mentioned above states, “In the ownership column, the name of the deity alone is required to be mentioned as the deity, being a juristic person is the owner of the land. The occupation of the land is also by the deity, which is carried out by the servant or the managers, on behalf of the deity.” The property of the Deity cannot be used by anybody else.

¹⁰⁶ In Sabhanayagar Temple, Chidambaram v. State Of Tamil Nadu, (2014) 12 SCC 454 (dated January 6, 2014, available at - https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/41133.pdf), the court upholds that temple trustee cannot be non-Hindu entity; trustees or managers of a temple must be associated with the Hindu faith, as they are serving the presiding Deity.

This principle is elaborated in paragraph 19 of the judgment, which outlines that religious denomination or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) who have been recognized as having the exclusive privilege to participate in the administration, worship, and services to the Deity of the temple, and who have a right established and recognized for several centuries are the rightful trustees.

The judgment also emphasized that such religious denominations or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) functioning as trustees have an essential requirement to be associated with the Hindu faith, as they serve in a capacity that is deeply intertwined with the religious and spiritual heritage of the temple.

Similarly, the Andhra Pradesh Endowments Act 1956 (available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/16889/1/act_no_30_of_1987.pdf) states that Non-Hindus or non-believers should not be appointed as trustees or heads of Hindu temples - "19. Disqualifications for Trusteeship - (1) A person shall be disqualified for being appointed as, or for being, trustee of any charitable or religious institution or endowment - [...] (j) if he does not profess Hindu religion in the case of religious institution or endowment."

Similarly, the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, Section 10, clearly states that all personnel must be Hindus (https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/13275/1/TNHR%26CE%20ACT,%201959%20-%20rev ised%20and%20updated.pdf).

cannot take over a Hindu nation, or the non-Hindu government cannot run or annex a Hindu kingdom¹⁰⁷.

Given the Doctrine of Continuity, the rights of the Deity and legal principles of Divine Sovereignty, Nehru’s annexation of Hindu kingdoms under a non-Hindu framework was unlawful¹⁰⁸ ¹⁰⁹.

¹⁰⁷However, the Madurai Adheenam is now governed by a non-Hindu entity which is against the Indian constitution

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/tamil-nadu/story/tamil-nadu-madurai-adheenam-desiga-paramacharya-dm k-corruption-hrce-1958910-2022-06-06

¹⁰⁸ Just as in the Chidambaram v. State Of Tamil Nadu (2014) 12 SCC 454, the judgment emphasized that religious denominations or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) functioning as trustees have an essential requirement to be associated with the Hindu faith, as they serve in a capacity that is deeply intertwined with the religious and spiritual heritage of the temple, likewise, the executive officers of the system of governance, including laws and constitution, must be derived from the Hindu Jurisprudence (the VedaAgamas and Dharmashastras) and heritage, inherent laws and statutes of the Hindu nation are deeply intertwined with its religious and spiritual heritage.

¹⁰⁹ This fact is well understood by the application of the legal principle and international customary law, "Ex injuria jus non oritur," which translates to "Law does not arise from injustice" or, more loosely, "From wrong or unjust action, law (or a right) cannot arise”

This principle is a fundamental concept in international law. It's rooted in the idea that one cannot benefit from wrongdoing. It plays a crucial role in various aspects of international law, including the prohibition of acquiring territory by force and the illegality of agreements or actions contrary to international law. It emphasized that the illegal action (annexation of a Hindu state by threat or force) cannot create legal rights for the wrongdoer.

De Jure and De Facto¹¹⁰ Statehood ¹¹¹

[]

112 113 114

¹¹⁰ An international entity with de facto (by fact) statehood has all the characteristics of a state and operates like one but may not be widely recognized.

An entity with de jure (by law) statehood meets the legal criteria and is widely recognized by the international community.

¹¹¹"Juridical statehood" refers to the legal recognition of a political entity as a sovereign state under international law. It is the formal, legal recognition that it is an entity and is constitutionally independent of all foreign states, recognized as sovereign or independent by most states, enjoys membership in international organizations, and possesses various rights and obligations under international law.

¹¹² The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States establishes that “the political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other states”, emphasizing the inherent rights of states to self-governance, territorial integrity, and political independence.

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, Article 3, December 26, 1933. Available at: https://www.ilsa.org/Jessup/Jessup15/Montevideo%20Convention.pdf

Further, Article 13 of the 1948 Charter of the Organization of American States elucidates the independent exercise of these rights within the framework of international law. https://www.oas.org/dil/1948%20charter%20of%20the%20organization%20of%20american%20states.pdf

¹¹³ The three ancient Hindu sovereign states of KAILASA, namely the kingdoms of Surya Vamsa Surangi Samrajyam Sarvajnapeetham, Suvarnapeetha Swargapura Samrajya Sarvajnapeetham, Shyamala Peetha Sarvajnapeetham possessed all these characteristics at all time.

However, at various times, temporarily, the control of their territory was lost. But this did not negate the existence of KAILASA, as per the doctrine of continuity, in the international customary law, which, as mentioned before, states that the upheavals and revolutions within a country, changes in governmental forms, the extent of a country's territory, and measures taken during a military occupation do not affect the existence of the State.

¹¹⁴ As a juridical state, KAILASA possesses an international legal personality, which means it can enter into treaties, join international organizations, and raise claims in international courts.

[]

115 116

¹¹⁵(i) The Roman Emperor Julian is noted to have received an embassy from a Pandya around 361 CE. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pandya-dynasty (ii) Trade and Trade Routes in Ancient India, by Moti Chandra, Abhinav Publications, Chapter VI - https://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/63122.pdf

¹¹⁶ Such ancient history illustrates that the constituent Sovereign nations and entities of the United States of KAILASA had been well-known international legal personalities at various times, possessing both De Jure and De Facto Statehood, and with their revival as KAILASA continues to do so.

1. KAILASA’s Perpetual Existence

[]

The SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam

[]THE SUPREME PONTIFF OF HINDUISM (SPH) BHAGAVAN NITHYANANDA

PARAMASHIVAM is recognized, revered and worshiped as the Incarnation of Paramaśiva (Primordial Hindu Divinity).

He was declared as “Bhagavān” (God)¹¹⁷, and graces with the title “Jñāna Vijñāna Cakravarti,” meaning accepted by all the Hindu Indigenous kings as the Emperor or Supreme Ruler of both the Peethas (spiritual Sanātana Hindu kingdoms) and the Sāmrājyas (States).

Officially coronated, The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) has undertaken the historic

mission of reviving 21 ancient, sovereign, indigenous Hindu kingdoms¹¹⁸—restoring them to their original glory and reestablishing the sacred ecosystems of enlightenment they once nurtured.

One such kingdom is the Surangi which boasts an unbroken legacy spanning over 14,500 years for which SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam is the 203rd Emperor¹¹⁹.

The Kingdom of Surangi was once a highly significant part of the ancient enlightened Sanātana Hindu civilization, covering an extensive area that contributed 45% of the world GDP at its peak¹²⁰.

¹¹⁷ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-s-zLCqhqS0, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYydX3cQkSw

¹¹⁸ Page 16 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1azUl0t4OR6taWJiy0MdoZe_TMmTSgqDE/view

¹¹⁹ Page 21 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1azUl0t4OR6taWJiy0MdoZe_TMmTSgqDE/view

¹²⁰ https://www.visualcapitalist.com/2000-years-economic-history-one-chart/

This was the highest GDP in the world circa 2000 years ago before the Islamic invasions.

Through a line of succession of 4000+ recorded years, SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam is the 293rd Sovereign Supreme Pontiff of the Kailasonnata Shyamalapeetha Sarvajnapeetha¹²¹ which ruled the Pandya Dynasty consisting of 56 Hindu nations¹²².

The Kingdom of Swargapuram has withstood centuries of trials over its thousand-year history. Before his passing in 1967, the 21st Guru Maha Sannidhanam, Sri La Sri Sivaprakasa Desika Pandara Sannadhi, revealed a prophetic message to his daughter-in-law, Sulikaambal.

He foretold that his spiritual lineage would one day be led by an incarnation of Paramashiva, who would take birth in Tiruvannamalai and be widely known by the name “Nithyananda.”

In 2015, upon his appointment, the 22nd Guru Maha Sannidhanam traveled to meet SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam. In His divine presence, he personally recognized SPH as none other than Paramashiva incarnate.

With reverence and adherence to the sacred customs of Swargapuram, he performed all traditional rituals to formally offer the Kingdom at the divine feet of SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam.¹²³

SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam is also the 233rd Sovereign Supreme Pontiff of the Sovereign ecclesiastical lineage of Kanchi KAILĀSA Sarvajnapeetha.¹²⁴

All the regents of the Chola empire – one of the longest-ruling dynasties in the history of the world, and the Pallava dynasty were coronated and

¹²¹ Page 23 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1azUl0t4OR6taWJiy0MdoZe_TMmTSgqDE/view

¹²² https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H7OJADdrFjrdl8nR5KMuc7sJkG6zXOob0K6X5wbmBno/view

¹²³ Pages 34-36 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1azUl0t4OR6taWJiy0MdoZe_TMmTSgqDE/view

¹²⁴ Pages 37-40 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1azUl0t4OR6taWJiy0MdoZe_TMmTSgqDE/view

initiated by the Guru Maha Sannidhanams (Supreme Pontiff) of the Sovereign ecclesiastical entity of Kanchi KAILĀSA Sarvajnapeetha Thondaimandala Adheenam.

The Thondaimandalam Sannidhanam Government-in-Exile was established in 1947, following the enforced disappearance of one of the Sannidhanams during decolonization and following India's partition.

In 2003, SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam established the government-in-exile as KAILASA in Los Angeles, California.

Appendix

Hindu Holocaust

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

2. Persecution of SPH and KAILASA

[][]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

125

[]

¹²⁵ Footage of mob lynching and acid attack at SPH https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EeeWoFGFSuYqybHe3YMEUNc6ou_7kSz5/view

[]

SPH was denied legal representation during the 2010 interrogation.

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]