Recognition of Indigenous Peoples: Report by Kailash Union

Recognition of Indigenous Peoples

Report by Kailash Union

The Indigenous Identity of Hindus

The indigenous identity of Hindus¹ ² lies in the native inhabitants as those belonging to the Vedic civilizational tradition in the then 56 indigenous Hindu nations³, which encompasses followers of Sanatana Dharma (Hinduism) - where "Hindu" signifies not merely a religious label but the foundational spiritual and cultural traditions of the lands.

[]

¹ This indigenous identity also includes other Vedic traditions such as Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism, which emerged organically within the broader Indic framework, as well as various tribal communities (Adivasis) whose diverse practices nevertheless form an integral part of Bharat's pre-colonial civilizational continuum.

² https://archive.org/details/india-that-is-bharat-9789354350047_compress

³ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H7OJADdrFjrdl8nR5KMuc7sJkG6zXOob0K6X5wbmBno/view

The continuous civilizational identity of Bharat was disrupted by Middle Eastern and British colonialism and coloniality, whereby the British imposed alien categories like "tribe," and "caste."⁴ ⁵

In 1871 colonial authorities employed the term "caste" to create rigid identity classifications based on superficial markers like surnames, physical appearances, and facial features.⁶ ⁷

Similarly, European colonizers artificially constructed the "tribal" identity in India, serving instead as an administrative tool to catalogue conquered populations, reformulate control policies, and facilitate their incorporation into the colonial system.

This artificial categorization was reinforced through a quadrilateral strategy of military force, legal/administrative systems, capitalist economy, and

⁴ The four Varnas of Hinduism that are defined based on Karmas and Gunas are a form of self-declaration and subjective fluid classification. The 3000 Jatis are endogamous people groups with 25,000 Upjatis that include exogamous Gotra groups.

Dirks (2001). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/young-angry-and-untouchable-indias-low- caste-threat-to-modi/articleshow/67589578.cms, https://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/08/17/india.caste/

The 1871 census and later literature faultily generalized the 25,000 people groups into a force-fitted classification using the same verbiage as of four Varnas which was contrary to both practical indigenous lifestyle experience and written scriptures.

This faulty generalization is described by William Robert Cornish, who supervised colonial government census operations in the Madras Presidency in 1871, as “Whether there was ever a period in which the Hindus were composed of four classes is exceedingly doubtful".

Mahābhārata (Vana-parva, chapter 177, verse 20), “śūdre caitad-bhavel-lakṣma dvije tac ca na vidyate। na vai śūdro bhavec-chudro brāhmaṇo na ca brāhmaṇoḥ॥” “If someone born a śūdra possesses the characteristics of a brāhmaṇa and someone born a brāhmaṇa does not, that śūdra should not be known

as a śūdra, and that brāhmaṇa should not be known as a brāhmaṇa.”

Dumont, Louis (1980), Homo Hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications, University of Chicago Press, pp. 66-67 ISBN 0-226-16963-4

⁵ British colonizers misrepresented the dynamic Varna system as a static, hereditary caste hierarchy through a series of census operations conducted between 1840-1925.

These surveys forcibly categorized diverse communities into artificial social compartments, deliberately fracturing the organic social fabric that had evolved over millennia.

⁶https://censusindia.gov.in/DigitalLibrary/data/Census_1881/Publication/India/1A-Memorandum%20on%2

0the%20census%20of%20British%20India,%201871-1872.pdf

⁷This pseudoscientific categorization was then weaponized through legislation such as the Criminal Tribes Act (1871), which institutionalized discrimination by declaring entire communities inherently criminal based solely on birth circumstances or family names. Text of the Criminal Tribes Act 1871 at Columbia University

Christian missionary activities, with German Lutheran, Anglican and Catholic missions converting over 85,000 Adivasis (tribals) between 1845-1900 while missionary education systematically promoted deculturation through European value systems.

The presence of Christian and Islamic identities in the subcontinent resulted from historical conquests and conversions, rendering them non-indigenous within the civilizational framework of the region.

These faiths were introduced through external forces, unlike the native Hindu traditions that have existed for millennia across 56 indigenous Hindu nations⁸—spanning roughly 6 million km² of Asia.

Over time, colonization and invasions led to the political annexation of these lands, eroding their indigenous sovereignty and cultural continuity.

Colonization, Colonialism and Coloniality

European coloniality⁹—a mindset of civilizational superiority rooted in Christianity and racial hierarchies—fundamentally disrupted Bharat’s indigenous consciousness, legal systems, and political structures.

Despite political independence in 1947, coloniality persists in India’s institutions, particularly the Constitution, which retains Eurocentric frameworks.

Colonization refers to the process by which a dominant power establishes colonies in foreign societies while maintaining political and economic ties to its homeland.

⁸ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H7OJADdrFjrdl8nR5KMuc7sJkG6zXOob0K6X5wbmBno/view

⁹ Rooted in the Age of Discovery—beginning with Christopher Columbus's 1492 expedition—European coloniality was driven by a deep-seated sense of racial and religious superiority.

Colonialism, in turn, represents the broader policy of using colonization as a means to expand influence, extract resources, and exert control over subjugated territories.

However, beyond the tangible structures of colonial rule lies coloniality—the deeper ideological framework that legitimizes and perpetuates colonialism through cultural domination, epistemic control, and the systematic reshaping of colonized societies in the image of the colonizer.

This mindset outlasts formal colonial rule, embedding itself in institutions, education, and collective consciousness.

Decoloniality emerges as the necessary response to coloniality, challenging its hegemony by reclaiming indigenous worldviews, restoring agency to colonized peoples, and dismantling the enduring legacies of imperial thought.

European coloniality introduced two particularly damaging frameworks that continue to shape global power structures.

First, the Modernity/Rationality Complex systematically portrayed European thought as universally valid and progressive while labeling indigenous knowledge systems as primitive or backward.

Second, colonial powers weaponized race and religion as tools of domination - Christianity was used to justify colonization as a "civilizing mission," while manufactured racial hierarchies like the Aryan-Dravidian theory were employed to fracture Bharat's civilizational unity and justify foreign rule.

European history was positioned as the universal narrative, while non-European cultures were relegated to the margins of "pre-modernity."

Language itself became a tool of domination: terms like "modern" and "rational" were weaponized to delegitimize alternative worldviews, cementing a civilizational hierarchy where European ways were unquestioningly deemed superior.

The colonial encounter fundamentally disrupted Bharat's civilizational fabric across multiple dimensions.

In the religious sphere, Christian missionaries and British administrators deliberately redefined Hinduism through a Christian lens, imposing foreign categories like "religion" that distorted its inherently Dharmic, cosmic-order-based nature.

This process included projecting Protestant anti-clericalism onto Brahmins, portraying them as oppressive priests in need of reform.

The education system became a key battleground, where colonial policies systematically erased indigenous epistemologies - including gurukuls and oral traditions - replacing them with Eurocentric curricula that positioned English as the sole language of power and intellectual legitimacy.

Following the 1648 Peace of Westphalia, European powers constructed an international legal order that defined "civilized nations" exclusively as those adhering to Christian-secular norms.

This deliberate Eurocentric standard served to justify colonial domination over societies like Bharat, which were deemed "uncivilized" precisely because they operated on different civilizational premises.

Far from being neutral or objective, this framework directly influenced India's constitutional development, ensuring that even after independence, governance structures remained continuations of colonial models rather than authentic expressions of indigenous political thought.

Neo-Hindutva: Product of Coloniality

[]

10

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar - A Staunch Supporter of British Colonialism and Ideological Father of Neo-Hindutva Extremists

Savarkar actively collaborated with British colonial rule after his release from prison and promoted neo-Hindutva.

Savarkar urged Hindus to join the British military. The Hindu Mahasabha, under Savarkar, organized recruitment drives for the British Army.

Savarkar’s Hindutva ideology (1923) excluded Muslims and Christians, deepening religious divides. He justified Hindu-Muslim separation long before the Muslim League’s Pakistan demand.

The British allowed his activities (e.g., Ghar Wapsi, anti-Muslim provocations) as it suited their divide-and-rule policy.

¹⁰ https://thewire.in/history/veer-savarkar-the-staunchest-advocate-of-loyalty-to-the-english-government https://www.counterview.net/2018/08/indian-nation-should-forget-supremacy.html

Today, the BJP celebrates Hindumisic Sarvarkar as a nationalist hero.

[]

Prime Minister Narendra Modi pays tribute to V.D. Savarkar in New Delhi¹¹

Illegal Annexation of Indigenous Hindu Sovereign Lands

At the time of the British withdrawal from India in 1947, 565 independent Hindu sovereign princely states were officially recognized in the Indian subcontinent.¹²

The Surangi Kingdom was amongst them.¹³

¹¹https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/veer-savarkar-on-136th-birth-anniversary-pm-modi-leaders-pay-tribute-

2044296

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-modi-pays-homage-to-savarkar-on-his-death-anniversary/arti cle69265116.ece

¹² Bhargava, R. P. (1991), The Chamber of Princes, Northern Book Centre, pp. 312–323, ISBN 978-81-7211-005-5

¹³ (i) Dr. Henry Soszynski - Study of Orissa estates during the 19th century http://members.iinet.net.au/~royalty/ips/misc/orissa_estates.html, research showing that Surangi was recognised as an independent princely state by the British Government ruled by the “Raja” (KING) (ii) https://www.indianrajputs.com/view/surangi

Even though the "Instrument of Accession" did not remove the kingdom's sovereignty¹⁴, after their land was ceded, their sovereignty was forcibly stripped.

Further, the Hindu Kings of these states were corrupted by the assurance of a personal "Privy purse"¹⁵ ¹⁶, which was later unilaterally abolished¹⁷, in exchange for selling out the Hindu traditions and constitutional principles.

Annexation by force and corruption is illegal under international law, per various international legal frameworks and customary international laws.¹⁸

¹⁴The template "Instrument of Accession" mentioned, "Nothing in this Instrument affects the continuance of my sovereignty in and over this State, or, save as provided by or under this Instrument, the exercise of any powers, authority and rights now enjoyed by me as Ruler of this state or the validity of any law at present in force in this State." White Paper of Indian States (1950) Ministry of States, Government of India, Instrument of Accession, Appendix VII, point 8, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/White_Paper_on_Indian_States_(1950)/Part_4/Instrument_of_Accession

¹⁵https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_Purse_in_India

¹⁶ The privy purse itself was unilaterally abolished by the Indian Government, invoking the conditions of fraud (article 49 VCLT) and that of "termination or suspension of the operation of a treaty as a consequence of its breach" (article 60) of the VCLT.

¹⁷ The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) 1969 clearly states as grounds for invalidity of a treaty to include: Restrictions on authority to express the consent of a State (article 49 VCLT); Corruption of a representative of a State (article 50 VCLT); Coercion of a State by the threat or use of force. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf

¹⁸Article 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text ; The International Law Commission (ILC) https://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/1_14.shtml ; Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf ; The Hague Regulations and Geneva Conventions (i) https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/hague/en/docs/hague_system_regulations.pdf, https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/adopt_ref/hague-convention-text.html

[]

The United States of Kailasa: Beyond Coloniality and Neo-Hindutva

Decoloniality emerges as a radical challenge to Eurocentrism's universalist claims, advocating not just for political independence but for the restoration of indigenous ways of knowing, being, and governing.

Unlike postcolonialism—which often critiques colonialism while still operating within its intellectual frameworks—decoloniality demands a complete dismantling of the colonial mindset.

It calls for epistemic disobedience, rejecting the very terms of engagement imposed by coloniality and centering marginalized perspectives as valid alternatives to Western modernity.

While decolonial thought first gained traction in Latin America and Africa—regions profoundly shaped by settler colonialism and slavery—there is urgent need for Asian voices, particularly from Bharat, to articulate their distinct experiences of resistance.

Crowned as the Sovereign of 21 ancient indigenous Hindu kingdoms of Bharat, The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam, revived KAILASA—the Ancient Enlightened Hindu Civilizational Nation—by reuniting these 21 historic indigenous Hindu kingdoms, as a testament that decoloniality and Hindu Swaraj (Self-Governance) is possible.

SPH hails from the minority Aboriginal Indigenous Agricultural Tribe (AIAT) of Tamil Nadu. He was born into the 'Thondaimandala Shaiva Velalar' community, a historically significant agrarian group in South India.¹⁹

The Juridical Statehood of KAILASA

KAILASA is a sovereign subject of international law-possessing distinctive attributes, derived from SPH’s inheritance of the unbroken succession and

¹⁹ The term Velalar derives from the Tamil words Vel (meaning "land" or "earth") and Alar (meaning "ruler" or "governor"), collectively signifying "one who governs the land."

Historically, the Velalars were recognized as landowners of marutha nilam (fertile agricultural land), one of the five classifications of land prescribed in Sangam literature. During the Pallava dynasty's reign, several warrior and agrarian communities—including the Kallars, Maravars, and Agamudayars (collectively known as Thevars)—were administratively consolidated under the broader designation of Velalars.

This sociocultural classification reflects the community's historical prominence in land stewardship and regional governance. The Velalar identity thus carries both agricultural and administrative significance, rooted in ancient Tamil traditions.

https://nithyanandapedia.org/wiki/1978_-_Thondaimandala_Shaiva_Velalar_Community

the revival of 21 ancient Hindu sovereign states and ecclesiastical historical institutions.²⁰ ²¹

[]

22

Doctrine of Continuity

International law recognizes a state's legal personality by recognizing its identity. This perspective extends to periods of annexation or occupation, where the legal personality of a state is considered to persist, enabling its subsequent re-establishment.²³

While the territory of the Surangi Kingdom was annexed unlawfully, KAILASA has no territorial conflict with the Republic of India or any other nation and does not claim any territorial rights over its erstwhile territories.

²⁰Surya Vamsa Surangi Samrajya Sarvajnapeetha, Suvarnapeetha Swargapura Samrajya Sarvajnapeetha, Shyamala Peetha Sarvajnapeetha

²¹ In addition, Kanchi KAILASA Sarvajnapeetha and seventeen sovereign Sanatana Hindu ecclesiastical historical institutions receive customary recognition by the UN as per the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

²²https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_1_1961.pdf

²³ Historical examples dating back to the eighteenth century include cases like Portugal and Genoa and instances of state re-establishment after the Vienna Congress of 1815. More recent examples, such as Poland, Ethiopia, Czechoslovakia, Albania, and Austria during and after World War II, serve as other modern instances of state re-establishment, offering additional evidence to recognize and preserve a state's legal personality over time.

KAILASA is a government-in-exile.²⁴ In 2003, SPH relocated KAILASA government-in-exile to Los Angeles, California.

[]

²⁴ The Thondaimandalam Sannidhanam Government in Exile was established in 1947, immediately following India's partition.

This significant event occurred when India gained independence from British colonial rule but was divided into two separate countries: India and Pakistan.

During decolonization, Hindu indigenous traditions and culture were targeted, leading to concerns about preserving the indigenous enlightened civilization. In response, the Government in Exile was formed to protect and promote Hindu heritage.

In 1988, in concurrence with the 68th Jagadguru Shankaracharya of Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, the 230th Guru Mahasannidhanam of Kanchi KAILASA Thondaimandala Sarvajnapeetha formally appointed The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam as its spiritual and administrative leader, ensuring the continuation of unbroken Hindu lineages. The 68th Kanchi Shankaracharya had this vision for a long time which was revealed in his 1920 letter to the League of Nations.

The enforced disappearance of one of the Sannidhanams during decolonization highlights the challenges faced by Hindu institutions. Understanding this history informs strategies for addressing contemporary challenges and preserving Hindu traditions.

By the doctrine of continuity²⁵ legal facts in the context of the history of the Hindu sovereign State of the Surangi Kingdom, SPH derives all sovereign rights and powers of the royal lineage as the Sovereign from His inheritance and continuation of the unbroken succession of the Surangi Kingdom.²⁶ ²⁷ ²⁸

Doctrine of Acquired Rights²⁹ ³⁰ ³¹ ³²

Sovereign powers and rights acquired from the various lineages of these ancient sovereign Hindu states by SPH through succession as the Sovereign of these states and KAILASA through the unification of these

²⁵ The Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties (1978) (https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/3_2_1978.pdf) addresses aspects of the Doctrine of Continuity by outlining how treaty obligations are handled during state succession.

In international customary law, the 'Principle of Continuity of States' (Doctrine of Continuity) implies that upheavals and revolutions within a country, changes in government, territorial adjustments, measures taken during military occupation, or other internal transformations do not negate the existence of the country, do not affect the legal personality and international obligations of the state.

²⁶ The Surangi Kingdom, through unification with 20 other sovereign Hindu States and sovereign ecclesiastical, historical entities, became part of the United States KAILASA, which thus became a Sovereign independent juridical state, with SPH as the Sovereign.

²⁷ As per the doctrine of continuity, these facts imply that the legitimacy of KAILASA manifests as a natural outcome of historical legal facts without mandating the need for further validation, confirmation, or support from other nations.

²⁸ While the territory of the Surangi Kingdom was annexed unlawfully, KAILASA has no territorial conflict with the Republic of India or any other nation and does not claim any territorial rights over its erstwhile territories.

²⁹Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties art. 70(1)(b), May 23, 1969, available at https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf, provides that the termination of an international treaty "does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties created through the execution of the treaty prior to its termination," and that the concerned parties created through the treaty continue to possess their respective acquired rights.

³⁰ For instance, the Permanent Court of International Justice held in its Advisory Opinion on the German Settlers in Poland (1923) that "Private rights acquired under existing law do not cease on a change of sovereignty." As per the United Nations International Law Commission, these statements of the Permanent Court clearly show that, in the event of a territorial change, an international obligation exists to respect the rights of private individuals acquired under the legislation previously in force.

³¹International Law Commission, Documents of the eleventh session, including the report of the Commission to the General Assembly, Fourth report on State Responsibility by Mr. F. V. Garcia-Amador, Special Rapporteur Document A/CN.4/119 on State responsibility. https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_119.pdf

³²Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Collection of Advisory Opinions, series B, No. 6, Settlers of German Origin in Territory ceded by Germany to Poland, pp. 36 and 38. See also other statements of the Court in Collection of Judgments, series A, No. 2, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions case, p. 28, and series A, No. 7, Case concerning certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia, pp. 22 and 42

states are absolute, undisputed, and additionally endorsed by the Republic of India through its treaty obligations.

Rights of the Deity and legal principles of Divine Sovereignty

The concept of Divine Sovereignty is universally recognized³³ and the concept of temple Deities owning property is a well-established legal principle.³⁴

In the case of Hindu Temples where the Deity is the owner of the temple and attached properties, the Presiding Deity of the Hindu Kingdom is the Sovereign of the Kingdom.

³³ Around 1976, a case of deity theft was filed in the UK court. The suing entity was a juristic person, which was a Hindu Deity. The case involved the repatriation of a stolen Nataraja Deities to India, which had been stolen in the autumn of 1976 from the Aril Thiru Viswanatha Swamy Thanjavur district, Tamil Nadu.

The Indian Government sued Bumper Development Corporation (BDC) and the metropolitan police as co-defendants. The case was fought by a Queen's Counsel, Adrian Hamilton, assisted by the persuasive Bhaskar Ghorpade, barrister-at-law. The Indian Government argued that "once a deity, always a deity. An idol remains a juristic person however long buried or damaged, since the deity and its juristic entity survive the total destruction of its earthly form." The judge concluded that a juristic entity with a title to the Nataraja is superior to that of the defendant. The case set a precedent for regaining stolen temple Deities. It marked the first time a Hindu Deity (embodied form of God as per Hinduism) was recognized as a juristic person in a UK court.

https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/international/story/19880315-indian-government-wins-stolen-nataraja- idol-case-in-british-court-797028-1988-03-14

These case references illustrate that the Hindu Law and principles related to Deity Rights and Divine Sovereignty are recognized in Common English Law, not just in some jurisdictions. Also, given the fact that these principles are recognized in Common English Law and applied before Colonization (in Hindu kingdoms under the Hindu constitution), during the colonial era (under Common English Law), and afterward under Indian (which also upholds these principles as illustrated with different case laws), it is clear that these principles are universal and undisputed.

³⁴ These concepts and principles in India are primarily governed by Hindu law and various judgments by the Supreme Court and High Courts.

One of the landmark cases that dealt with Deities being juristic persons capable of owning property is the case of "Ram Jankijee Deities vs State Of Bihar & Ors (1999) 5 SCC 50". In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that Hindu idols are juristic entities and have the legal status of a minor under the guardianship of the managing trustee or priest of the temple. Implying that the Deity, as a juristic person, can own property, sue, and be sued in court. The property in question is held in trust for the Deity, and the managing trustee or the priest acts on behalf of the deity.

The King of a Hindu nation was a mere regent of the Lord³⁵, similarly to how the executive officers of the temples are mere servants³⁶ of the presiding Deity.

Additionally, non-Hindu practitioners cannot be trustees, executive officers, or personnel in the Hindu temples³⁷, and therefore, non-Hindus entities

³⁵ For example, Marthanda Varma, King of Padmanabhapuram, Kingdom of Travancore, in December 1749, declared and dedicated the kingdom to the presiding Deity, Sri Padmanabha, and subsequently assumed the title Padmanabha Dasa (the servant of Lord Padmanabhan). This act is known as Thripadidanam, which meant that the kingdom became the property of Padmanabhaswamy. Since then, the kingdom's sovereign has been the temple's Deity, while the head of the royal family ruled on the Deity’s behalf as guardian and pre-eminent servant (Padmanabha Dasa). Since that day, Travancore has not belonged to any one person or the royal family but to the Lord. The kings merely ruled as vassals of agents of the Deity. Marthanda Varma’s last words to his successor, Rama Varma, were, “No deviation whatever should be made in regard to the dedication of the Kingdom to Sri Padmanabhaswamy, and all further territorial acquisitions should be made over to the Devasom.”

³⁶ The Executive Officers are mere servants of the Deity.

In “State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. V. Pujari Utthan Avam Kalyan Samiti & Anr”, (2021) SC 4245, AIR 2021 SC 690, (dated September 6, 2021, available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122592345/), the Supreme court ruled that the presiding Deity owns all temple property as a legal person and the name of neither the District Collector (State District Executive) nor the Pujari (priest) be put in the property ownership papers(Revenue records). Paragraph 27 of the judgment mentioned above states, “In the ownership column, the name of the deity alone is required to be mentioned as the deity, being a juristic person is the owner of the land. The occupation of the land is also by the deity, which is carried out by the servant or the managers, on behalf of the deity.” The property of the Deity cannot be used by anybody else.

³⁷ In Sabhanayagar Temple, Chidambaram v. State Of Tamil Nadu, (2014) 12 SCC 454 (dated January 6, 2014, available at - https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/41133.pdf), the court upholds that temple trustee cannot be non-Hindu entity; trustees or managers of a temple must be associated with the Hindu faith, as they are serving the presiding Deity.

This principle is elaborated in paragraph 19 of the judgment, which outlines that religious denomination or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) who have been recognized as having the exclusive privilege to participate in the administration, worship, and services to the Deity of the temple, and who have a right established and recognized for several centuries are the rightful trustees.

The judgment also emphasized that such religious denominations or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) functioning as trustees have an essential requirement to be associated with the Hindu faith, as they serve in a capacity that is deeply intertwined with the religious and spiritual heritage of the temple.

Similarly, the Andhra Pradesh Endowments Act 1956 (available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/16889/1/act_no_30_of_1987.pdf) states that Non-Hindus or non-believers should not be appointed as trustees or heads of Hindu temples - "19. Disqualifications for Trusteeship - (1) A person shall be disqualified for being appointed as, or for being, trustee of any charitable or religious institution or endowment - [...] (j) if he does not profess Hindu religion in the case of religious institution or endowment."

Similarly, the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, Section 10, clearly states that all personnel must be Hindus (https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/13275/1/TNHR%26CE%20ACT,%201959%20-%20rev ised%20and%20updated.pdf).

cannot take over a Hindu nation, or the non-Hindu government cannot run or annex a Hindu kingdom³⁸.

Given the Doctrine of Continuity, the rights of the Deity and legal principles of Divine Sovereignty, Nehru’s annexation of Hindu kingdoms under a non-Hindu framework was unlawful³⁹ ⁴⁰.

³⁸However, the Madurai Adheenam is now governed by a non-Hindu entity which is against the Indian constitution

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/tamil-nadu/story/tamil-nadu-madurai-adheenam-desiga-paramacharya-dm k-corruption-hrce-1958910-2022-06-06

³⁹ Just as in the Chidambaram v. State Of Tamil Nadu (2014) 12 SCC 454, the judgment emphasized that religious denominations or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) functioning as trustees have an essential requirement to be associated with the Hindu faith, as they serve in a capacity that is deeply intertwined with the religious and spiritual heritage of the temple, likewise, the executive officers of the system of governance, including laws and constitution, must be derived from the Hindu Jurisprudence (the VedaAgamas and Dharmashastras) and heritage, inherent laws and statutes of the Hindu nation are deeply intertwined with its religious and spiritual heritage.

⁴⁰ This fact is well understood by the application of the legal principle and international customary law, "Ex injuria jus non oritur," which translates to "Law does not arise from injustice" or, more loosely, "From wrong or unjust action, law (or a right) cannot arise”

This principle is a fundamental concept in international law. It's rooted in the idea that one cannot benefit from wrongdoing. It plays a crucial role in various aspects of international law, including the prohibition of acquiring territory by force and the illegality of agreements or actions contrary to international law. It emphasized that the illegal action (annexation of a Hindu state by threat or force) cannot create legal rights for the wrongdoer.

De Jure and De Facto⁴¹ Statehood ⁴²

[]

43 44 45

⁴¹ An international entity with de facto (by fact) statehood has all the characteristics of a state and operates like one but may not be widely recognized.

An entity with de jure (by law) statehood meets the legal criteria and is widely recognized by the international community.

⁴²"Juridical statehood" refers to the legal recognition of a political entity as a sovereign state under international law. It is the formal, legal recognition that it is an entity and is constitutionally independent of all foreign states, recognized as sovereign or independent by most states, enjoys membership in international organizations, and possesses various rights and obligations under international law.

⁴³The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States establishes that “the political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other states”, emphasizing the inherent rights of states to self-governance, territorial integrity, and political independence.

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, Article 3, December 26, 1933. Available at: https://www.ilsa.org/Jessup/Jessup15/Montevideo%20Convention.pdf

Further, Article 13 of the 1948 Charter of the Organization of American States elucidates the independent exercise of these rights within the framework of international law. https://www.oas.org/dil/1948%20charter%20of%20the%20organization%20of%20american%20states.pdf

⁴⁴ The three ancient Hindu sovereign states of KAILASA, namely the kingdoms of Surya Vamsa Surangi Samrajyam Sarvajnapeetham, Suvarnapeetha Swargapura Samrajya Sarvajnapeetham, Shyamala Peetha Sarvajnapeetham possessed all these characteristics at all time.

However, at various times, temporarily, the control of their territory was lost. But this did not negate the existence of KAILASA, as per the doctrine of continuity, in the international customary law, which, as mentioned before, states that the upheavals and revolutions within a country, changes in governmental forms, the extent of a country's territory, and measures taken during a military occupation do not affect the existence of the State.

⁴⁵ As a juridical state, KAILASA possesses an international legal personality, which means it can enter into treaties, join international organizations, and raise claims in international courts.

[]

46 47

⁴⁶The Roman Emperor Julian is noted to have received an embassy from a Pandya around 361 CE. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pandya-dynasty (ii) Trade and Trade Routes in Ancient India, by Moti Chandra, Abhinav Publications, Chapter VI - Trade between India and the Roman Empire, page 111,”From those land routes at least in the time of Augustus several Indian embassies reached Rome. At least four such embassies are mentioned in the Latin literature, namely 1) the embassy from Puru country (the territory between the Jhelum and Beas) took with it to Rome serpents, monals, tigers and a letter written in Greek language, 2) the embassy from Broach was accompanied by a Buddhist monk named Germanos, 3) an embassy from the Chera country. It was reported in Rome that at Muziris (Cranganore) was built a temple in honour of Augustus and 4) an embassy from the Pandya country brought with it precious stones, pearls and an elephant. We know that in the time of Augustus commercial relations between India and Rome grew but in this the balance of trade was in favour of India from the very beginning and as a result of this Roman gold poured into the country.” https://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/63122.pdf

⁴⁷ Such ancient history illustrates that the constituent Sovereign nations and entities of the United States of KAILASA had been well-known international legal personalities at various times, possessing both De Jure and De Facto Statehood, and with their revival as KAILASA continues to do so.

KAILASA’s Perpetual Existence

KAILASA within its historical cultural, religious legal framework has and shall remain in perpetuity in the future, notwithstanding the impacts of climate change during the time of Kumari Kandam⁴⁸, colonial legacies, annexation of territories by modern states and upheavals resulting in loss of physical territory.

Oppression by the Deep State: The Struggle to Reclaim Self-Determination⁴⁹

Malicious forces within the Deep State, driven by anti-Hindu bigotry, deliberately targeted SPH for courageously restoring KAILASA—the sacred, sovereign embodiment of ancient Hindu civilization—and for empowering indigenous nations globally through the United Ancient Nations. This coordinated smear campaign exposes the Islamo-Leftist lobby's fear of Dharmic resurgence and their desperate attempts to suppress indigenous sovereignty.

This historic intergovernmental organization, founded and guided by SPH, now stands as a powerful alliance of over 125 indigenous nations and groups, collectively reclaiming their spiritual, cultural, and political sovereignty.

⁴⁸ Kumari Kandam is the Ancient Enlightened Sanatana Hindu Civilization, emphasizing its role in shaping cultural heritage and spiritual beliefs, thus strengthening the bond between Hindu identity and transnational ancient roots. However, the sovereign lands of its citizens were lost to the waves of the Indian Ocean when Kumari Kandam, the ancient Hindu homeland, sank beneath the surface due to the ravages of cataclysmic climate change and ecological destruction. This calamity, a stark reminder of the consequences of neglecting the delicate balance of nature, has driven the people of KAILASA to seek a new home, where they may rebuild and thrive in harmony with the environment. Later on in history, the rest of our lands were lost as an effect of colonialism, further eroding our connection to our ancestral heritage and cultural identity.

⁴⁹ https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media, https://nithyanandapedia.org/

[]

50 51

⁵⁰ https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media, https://nithyanandatruth.org/

⁵¹Reports on Jagadish "Jaggi" Vasudev’s (Satguru) attempt to kill SPH https://www.gurumag.com/inside-sadhgurus-cult-empire/, https://www.youtube.com/live/uLFpZBpGj1A

[]

52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59

[]

⁵²https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/tree/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusatio

n

⁵³https://kailaasa.org/briefings-statements/key-conspirators-behind-deepfake-video-arrested-sridhar-now-j

ailed-interstate-nbw-issued-for-lenin/

⁵⁴ https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/116.-Samaya_Judgmentonly-1.pdf

⁵⁵ https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Judgment1.pdf https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Order.pdf

⁵⁶ https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/04.-attachment_Lencioni-Email.pdf

⁵⁷ https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1FDLLqGfXhjxc9k3eime2-DlozQOvnb0u

⁵⁸https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ex.-M-Rao-Bench-Warrant-11.20.13-copy_Redacted-co

py.pdf

https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ex.-P-Rao-10.9.14-Motion-for-Contempt-Certified-Order3

.pdf

https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AR-DS1-2-Rao-Bench-Warrant-10.20.14-1pg.pdf

⁵⁹https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/RAO_MTS_FinalOrder_JudgeBarkley_April18-2012.pdf

60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70

Recent Systemic Challenges Facing KAILASA: Documented Cases of Deep State Oppression

1. KAILASA’s Struggle to Protect Temple and Deities in India 2007: Land Gifts & Spiritual Foundation⁷¹

- July 2, 2007: Ganesh gifted land in Seithur Village to Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam.

- August 6, 2007: A second land gift in Samsigapuram where a temple was established.

- The trust developed these lands into spiritual and charitable hubs, conducting rituals, organic farming, and meditation programs.⁷²

⁶⁰ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k13qxtAD7jRNd7iyejU41mp8An0hibeE/view?usp=share_link

⁶¹ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ablp13MZmXaWgn82LRkgGmKEmHWtPSsU/view?usp=share_link

62 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PYP-kJ7bUe9SbqS9gUPMfs4SLuM8swPY/view?usp=share_link

⁶³ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PY0zQ2_-yyde9RkTBrdP5IMk8fr869tn/view?usp=share_link

64 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rKo1wVt1f8c8f9_AD8YroaqpteTO1Sk-/view?usp=share_link ⁶⁵Specialists in Human Rights and Human Mobility https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1zez1O8F9a64G7LFohj-eGf8kTS9J4Y5J

⁶⁶ https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1xGcOHll7AeXdrLyQR2mzvoDNLOoxNlF8

⁶⁷ Mission Scalabriniana (MSC) is part of the Congregation of Missionary Sisters of St. Charles Borromeo

- Scalabrinianas, an organization founded in Piacenza, Italy, by Monserat Juan Bautista Scalabrini, in the year 1895. Its mission is to welcome, promote, protect and integrate migrant and refugee populations. It is present in 27 countries. https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1CX7izIoKQiKyjv_PONRpLuyfhmE24IIw

⁶⁸ Professor at the Andean University Simón https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1fvALF1OFAzAKHq4_SXDrYZ643OjOA2sm

⁶⁹https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/tree/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusatio

n/expert%20opinion%20by%20medical%20experts

⁷⁰https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/blob/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusatio

n/Top%2010%20false%20claims%20of%20false%20rape%20accuser%20with%20datewise%20proofs% 20of%20contradictions%20proving%20his%20innocence.pdf

⁷¹ [Seithur Gift Deed Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1de3Rz2JkHRqt2A8BKBSwD62RBknBycu2 [Samsigapuram Gift Deed Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1st/1aKhJt4epZSA3SBefeX6j8R_Ba0p8QuqM ⁷² [Mahasaptayagam] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T1g2sFxt-MjwtRfFIXyRh7jkjDz1hWEa/view?usp=drivesdk

[Satsang Video] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1We64GSwQn1BHcMQbdH65zf_1q4x-SylB/view?usp=drivesdk [Padayatra] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rG0SATVfu-mFRffnTYGDWATl_KHU_1XH

[Organic Farm Inauguration] https://drive.google.com/file/d/16OaF5GAhLYa2GB219HRKZ9arb4UpCur-/view?usp=drive_link [Meditation hall inauguration] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HPJOEKikyFWH_96jWoKaHxOEdsUblaJv?usp=drive_link [Padayatra Photos] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12UGEKNkCs9zsxnDtdpF6VTEU0RMe7XqF?usp=drive_link

[Meditation Program] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-T3DNzwPAAcvH-IUyGdN5B5-FnyJw9-s?usp=drive_link

[Meeting with Hindu Leaders] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jvKvqzmrJWMMvIf09SHLomu6poSueQT9?usp=drive_link [School Inauguration] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1OuzwcqBT2aeSSp_UJDMX7VaTj9nHrpAU

[Pongal Harvest Ritual] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KZCNfH4Q1L_XufJAAnq5BM7hQ1L2WIKw?usp=drive_link Construction of temple https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KZCNfH4Q1L_XufJAAnq5BM7hQ1L2WIKw?usp=drive_link

2010–2012: Legal Battles

- March 5, 2010: Ganesh illegally unilaterally registered the cancellation of the gift deeds, a move that defied the legal sanctity of the original deeds, which had been intended as permanent transfers to the trust.⁷³

- January 12, 2012: A brahmachari, Sri Nithya Tattvabhothananda, was assaulted, and the temple was looted. A police complaint was filed but ignored.⁷⁴

- March 12, 2012: Ganesh withdrew his lawsuit, acknowledging the trust’s rightful use of the land.⁷⁵

2019: Violent Attacks & Arson⁷⁶

- Anti-Hindu terrorists attempted to burn a brahmachari alive. Despite evidence, authorities took no action.

2023⁷⁷–2024: Escalating Persecution

- April 15, 2024⁷⁸: Ganesh’s goons vandalized the Seithur temple, stealing sacred items. Police ignored complaints.

⁷³ [Samsigapuram Cancellation] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1ue-Xriy6D9CALlvsmyz_qWOFMh4V5I5r [Seithur Cancellation] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1NM BmP5gynpz5zTmeKXlKZThyccfHxh

[Property Seizure Attempts] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LcFKY5uRuZpkYRJmtSa943LdAJvATbrb?usp=drive_link [Property Seizure Attempts] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LcFKY5uRuZpkYRJmtSa943LdAJvATbrb?usp=drive_link

⁷⁴ [FIR Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1meTFWn5lmj_0oWCIxXIkpCZW1HOo48Xf/view?usp=drive_link

⁷⁵ [Not Press Memo] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nZOwKUw-UEtejiARypwYzsQMwmAYpk0a/view?usp=drive_link [Court Dismissal Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1cxUxmqSdwb3xUxQTmg93zIkGsyZGn3iV

⁷⁶ [2019 Attack Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1lZSJv5WwoOxXftublmupXzk-URPgT39l

⁷⁷ [2023 Lawsuit Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1wfABK01KgWWTjtw5b-LZ7TwsUWOLCJLJ

⁷⁸ [O.S. No. 33/2024 Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Dv_nPr5bOgOorqQpTaKrS5r4BnIP7D_c [Police Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Njg_6zKHDSjzkNn-uNJSzxADNzjS3Yni [Police Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Njg_6zKHDSjzkNn-uNJSzxADNzjS3Yni

[Morning Threats Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1i_NIYCQ7tBkue-yJK7yfClepiCmL5RBR?usp=drive_link [Surekha’s Call Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tof3T4CDSNgLRimfHjrl-yiPN5cJcBZ5/view?usp=drive_link [Lady Sanyasis Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tCaQfzUtkFXgLcy5FtFyw4213Tbj0UbP?usp=drive_link [Post-Dawn Threats Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Ybg9VSl2VbzjDN8eZTlo7TZetH6bRA1m [Online Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Sr4-ZYIvRz39ZgNw2MDuphianfJcCYHz

[SP Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1jkHUyn9QSSyyEFKSPnpgGpiQeHoayFPH [Registered Mail Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1VRvJbtjh8nslVxxBv64v1p1dY8U405be

- June 26, 2024⁷⁹: Thirty goons attacked the Sethur ashram, threatening to kill sanyasis and burning sacred objects. Advocate S. Surekha filed complaints, but police inaction persisted.

- False FIRs: Authorities fabricated charges against Surekha, while Ganesh’s crimes went unpunished.

2025⁸⁰: State-Sanctioned Violence

- February 10, 2025: The Sub Collector issued an illegal order barring the trust from its properties. The Trust did not receive any formal communication regarding the issuance of the order. The absence of prior notification constitutes a clear violation of procedural fairness and natural justice.⁸¹

⁷⁹ Chats with Murali Krishna, brother of DSP Preethi, reveal a sinister pattern of intimidation and manipulation. On June 28, he insisted “intervention” was mandatory

[June 28 Chat Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aJX4ilD5H0TUvNzNiYryKTE78Vrcz1Ga/view?usp=drive_link By September 24, he spread false news of arrests and bail - [September 24 Chat Evidence]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zIgkrEvfOkmRixnyaBmoc44Y-SQpot05/view?usp=drive_link followed by a September 30 attempt to broker a settlement

[September 30 Chat Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vHUE6Zq81rDbpalWAMs3NCmUl2y0bLXY/view?usp=drive_link

On October 3, he threatened property seizure, predating an illegal complaint and summons https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OoQLdTip7FGx2t35K8sp0xzrAxZ51eD4/view?usp=drive_link

These exchanges suggest a coordinated effort to undermine the trust, with police complicity a recurring theme. [Summons Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1DHkdv4c6vMs_l0eIR301V7hjyqsx5xaL [Deepa’s Inquiry Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/12lxKPVLpD6YxSo4TTMutNi0ygk_9A_ud [Sureka’s Inquiry Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1FWPyslw4VDvpkRz3lywGSf9ogweyNnbD [Summons]https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1DHkdv4c6vMs_l0eIR301V7hjyqsx5xaL

[Deepa’s Inquiry] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/12lxKPVLpD6YxSo4TTMutNi0ygk_9A_ud [Sureka’s Request] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1vBt8NWn-iO-YBJG6xZiFQ-0if34kquNG [Sureka’s Inquiry] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1FWPyslw4VDvpkRz3lywGSf9ogweyNnbD

⁸⁰ [Police Demand Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1o64CzVPo3s9akurCSeUz5ePKurz_Xlpj [Order Received Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1R9Qk_6ShrTteUz61FQSl2CJVj25rnw8V

The detailed video evidences of the same captured by both Kailasa and the press are at (305) Persecution of KAILASA Rajapalayam and Seithur - YouTube.

The evidence—[Police Demand] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1o64CzVPo3s9akurCSeUz5ePKurz_Xlpj [Order Received] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1R9Qk_6ShrTteUz61FQSl2CJVj25rnw8V

[Court Stay Order on the Illegal Order of Sub Collector] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xDhmyleKuP2wjrzvVs9lxKgvn1X8WAkG/view?usp=drive_link

⁸¹ Upon subsequent discovery of the order, it became evident that the mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 164 of the BNSS were disregarded. The provision explicitly requires an Executive Magistrate to:

1. Issue a reasoned written order specifying the grounds for action; and

2. Provide formal notice to affected parties, ensuring an opportunity to be heard.

The failure to adhere to these statutory obligations resulted in a denial of the Trust’s right to a fair hearing, rendering the order procedurally defective. This omission suggests either administrative negligence or a deliberate circumvention of due process, warranting judicial scrutiny.

The circumstances indicate a breach of fundamental legal principles, necessitating appropriate remedial action to rectify the denial of justice.

- March 20–26, 2025: Police and goons forcibly evicted monks, injured Ma Deepa, cut sacred Rudraksha malas from female monks, and detained devotees without legal basis.

- March 25, 2025: The Madurai High Court granted a stay on the illegal order, but police defiance continued.

The struggle is not just for land but for the survival of a sacred indigenous tradition backed by the deep state. Despite legal victories, state complicity, land mafia aggression, and violent attacks persist.

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

The Denial of Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) in India

The Dhyanapeeta Charitable Trust, established in 2001, promotes yoga, spirituality, and social welfare through initiatives like free food distribution, medical camps, and disaster relief.

It received FCRA registration in 2006, renewed in 2016, allowing it to accept foreign funds.

However, its 2021 renewal application was denied in 2024 without proper justification, severely disrupting its operations.

FCRA Denial & Legal Violations

- The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) rejected renewal citing Sections 12(4)(e) and 12(4)(f)(iii) of the FCRA, claiming "public interest" concerns and alleged ties to its founder, SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam (who retired as trustee in 2016).

- No pending cases exist against current trustees, making the denial legally questionable.

- The government provided no prior notice or opportunity to respond, violating natural justice.

- A fresh FCRA application in 2024 was initially marked "granted" but later denied under false claims of missing documents, despite the Trust’s compliance.

Broader Context of FCRA Misuse

- The 2025 USCIRF report highlights India’s misuse of FCRA to target NGOs, religious minorities, and human rights groups.

- Over 20,000 FCRA registrations have been canceled since 2012, indicating systemic suppression.

Impact on the Trust

- Frozen bank accounts have stopped critical projects (temples, free food services, medical camps).

- The Trust, with a 20-year clean record, is now challenging the denial in the Karnataka High Court.

Legal Challenge: The Trust has filed a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court⁸².

Systematic Persecution of KAILASA in Bolivia: Violations of Indigenous Rights & International Law Amidst Legally Ratified Agreements

KAILASA and indigenous nations in Bolivia established mutually beneficial agreements, under which KAILASA extended financial support, humanitarian aid, and social initiatives, including free education, nutritious meals, and healthcare services.

These agreements were voluntarily entered into by the indigenous communities, fully aligned with their constitutional right to self-determination under Bolivian law, specifically:

Articles 30.2:

In the framework of the unity of the State, and in accordance with this Constitution, the nations and rural native indigenous peoples enjoy the following rights:

- To self-determination and territoriality.

- To the collective ownership of land and territories.

- To the practice of their political, juridical and economic systems in accord with their world view.

- To autonomous indigenous territorial management, and to the exclusive use and exploitation of renewable natural resources

⁸² https://drive.google.com/file/d/172z8MPD1_-foQR7wqKta9Yd4gdukAfF3/view?usp=sharing

existing in their territory without prejudice to the legitimate rights acquired by third parties.

1. Article 289: Rural native indigenous autonomy consists in self-government as an exercise of free determination of the nations and rural native indigenous peoples, the population of which shares territory, culture, history, languages, and their own juridical, political, social and economic organization or institutions.

A coordinated campaign of persecution against the Hindu monks and nun of the Sovereign Order of KAILASA’s Nithyananda was orchestrated by the anti-indigenous deep state in Bolivia, involving media disinformation and hate speech, physical attacks, unlawful detention, and human rights violations under both Bolivian and international law.

Key Incidents

1. Persecution of Male Monks (March 20, 2025, Beni Department)⁸³

[]

⁸³ https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1C_PELd5F1QUqBRVKDxo8cNBJxguZR3C1

Persecution of Female Monks (March 21–23, 2025, Santa Cruz & La Paz)⁸⁴

[]

⁸⁴ Audio testimonial Ma Lok Teng Lung (Guruprasadini): https://drive.google.com/file/d/12qqSKfvwezLsk-LGxLMN39KL4OZ4-QqR/view?usp=drive_link Evidence of abduction from their residence and illegal detention at immigration https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1O8J_e5dSnuNLiZuoIZrNrPmor6XPxEZD

Abduction from La Paz international airport and dumped at the Peru-Bolivian border https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/12HeNl4RcFQTKXbb_FhD84nohqcgqxjes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVSX_fmPslc

Legal & Human Rights Violations

- Bolivian Constitution: Violated indigenous autonomy rights (Articles 270, 290.2, 292–296).

- International Law: Breached ICCPR (freedom of movement, due process) and UDHR (prohibition of torture, arbitrary detention).

- Rome Statute (Article 7): Potential crimes against humanity (persecution based on religion/ethnicity).

Media Disinformation Campaign

- Over a 100⁸⁵ racist anti-indigenous global, Bolivian and Indian media outlets⁸⁶ spread hate speech, and lawfare labeling KAILASA a "fictional nation" and defaming SPH as a "self-proclaimed god-man."

- Fabricated claims: Media accused KAILASA of exploiting indigenous lands by coercing Indigenous nations into signing agreements, despite legally ratified, notarized and protocolized agreements and despite obtaining written community consent prior to the execution of any given agreement.

Despite facing persecution fueled by Hinduphobic rhetoric, racial discrimination, and anti-indigenous agendas propagated by certain political and media factions, Bolivia's indigenous communities remain steadfast in their alliance with KAILASA, continuing to uphold their partnership with resolute solidarity.

Systemic Persecution & Obstruction of Hindu Religious Celebration in The Gambia

⁸⁵ https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1rdmintiugyCBdqG3BfQ3G8fzNc3Js8Lw

⁸⁶ Such as El Deber and Ana Bolivia as well as India outlets like Times Now, TV9, Zee Tamil news, News Minute and Republic World

A coordinated campaign of persecution against the indigenous Hindu religious global peace event—the Kumbh Mela—organized by a monk of the Sovereign Order of KAILASA’s Nithyananda, in The Gambia was orchestrated in February-March 2025.

Evidence indicates that external political forces, operating through local proxies, engaged in disinformation, hate speech, threats, and coercion to suppress the celebration.

The interference aligns with a broader pattern of targeting indigenous Hindus groups.

Background

The Kumbh Mela, a sacred Hindu gathering, was organized to promote universal peace and cultural unity in The Gambia. However, from its inception, the event faced unlawful obstruction—including false government alerts, intimidation of participants, and threats of punitive action against supporters.

Key Acts of Persecution

1. False "Red Alert" Disinformation Campaign

- Ram Mohan, the Honorary Consul of India in The Gambia, circulated a fraudulent "Red Corner Alert" claim, falsely alleging criminal status for KAILASA.

- This baseless alert was used to pressure local authorities and venues into denying support.

2. Coercive Diplomacy

- A key female organizer was threatened with Indian embassy blacklisting if she participated.

- False claims were spread that the event was "cancelled due to illness"—a deliberate lie to deter attendees.

Coercion of Sponsors & Venues

- Sponsors withdrew after being warned of "consequences" by Ram Mohan for association.

- The host temple was pressured to cancel, with threats of passport revocation for participants.

Post-Event Retaliation

- After the Kumbh Mela successfully took place, attendees were summoned to meetings and warned against future involvement.

Evidence of Deep State Involvement⁸⁷

- The repetition of identical threats (passport cancellations, embassy interference) suggests a systematic playbook.

- The use of diplomatic channels to spread disinformation indicates state-linked actors.

This was not mere local resistance—but a coordinated effort to suppress indigenous Hindu religious freedom through fear, deception, and

⁸⁷ Whatsapp message - Indian consul, Ram Mohan, mentioning that KAILASA is on red corner https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ShDptfM4NdkcvyXOeJIJpoP0xd1vQsdm/view?usp=drive_link 01.19.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan mentioning that KAILASA institution is on a red corner alert https://drive.google.com/file/d/1166RV0mfZON9mEN0i83l1ApUjQdU5HP5/view?usp=drive_link 01.02.2023 Voice recording - Sakshi received a threatening phone call from Ram Mohan https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bpgra64ZKX1WIm3OfYhp1h-qVBCbjkno/view?usp=drive_link 02.03.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan gave threat message to Sakshi https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VymJeZq_x_wIq0jcFneNRKEegeExz9pS/view?usp=drive_link 02.04.2025 Voice recording - Out of fear backed off from offering swimming pool & financial support https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NBBE3LJDFBayklGSFZeFSYvwu46BNESn/view?usp=drive_link 02.03.2025 Voice recording - Nandu telling to cancel Kumbh Mela https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xchNiwmr_-Mq69gmnM3-BdWO5P_JE2r4/view?usp=drive_link 02.04.2025 Voice recording - Nandu telling to cancel Kumbh Mela

https://drive.google.com/file/d/12-RCxt-mENamrktKOMbFLdtwgqYdhpLU/view?usp=drive_link 02.11.2025 Voice recording - 2nd attempt - new whatsApp group Kumbh to Mahadev https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t0rEyzxHW7y0_TQrBg_COOjrTmkbEHN4/view?usp=drive_link 03.13.2025 Voice recording of Sanju Ram Mohan meeting with Indian group and said Indian passport will be cancelled https://drive.google.com/file/d/18T9zxOqX5uzO1urNSQy2WSY8XBYQgxqq/view?usp=drive_link 03.14.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan said he received a letter from the Government of India who will cancel the passports of participants of the Kumbh Mela

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iNGK-FaoErnZTyMC3JNru8jDBDmjAuu1/view?usp=drive_link

institutional coercion. The tactics mirror known transnational deep state operations used against dissenting groups globally.

[]

State-Sponsored Brutality: The Illegal Detention, Torture, and Religious Persecution in Equatorial Guinea⁸⁸

KAILASA’s Ambassador Ma Vijayapriya Nithyananda and Ma Nithya Shivamayananda traveled to Equatorial Guinea (EG) to establish humanitarian services under a bilateral treaty signed by EG’s Vice President which was authenticated by the embassy of EG in Congo, the Attorney General and high-level officials at the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

However, after more than one year of being present in the country, they were accused of presenting falsified documents and subjected to 36 days of illegal detention, torture, and severe human rights violations by the National Gendarmerie of EG.

Key Events & Violations

1. Illegal Arrest & Detention (December 17, 2024 - January 21, 2025)

- Forced Entry & Assault: On December 17, 2024, 15 armed men violently broke into their apartment, slammed Ambassador Vijayapriya, restrained both nuns, and confiscated their passports, phones, and laptops. Even as of March 27, 2025, Ambassador Vijayapriya’s physical wounds from the assault remain unhealed.

- No Valid Court Order: The Director General claimed to have a warrant but refused to give a copy to Ambassador Vijayapriya.

- Solitary Interrogation Without Counsel: Ambassador Vijayapriya endured a 5.5-hour solitary interrogation by the Director General and two prosecutors without legal representation, during which she was subjected to psychological torture in an unlawful attempt to coerce a false confession.

⁸⁸ Full report and evidences: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Gc7lrsbln4jQFCSQTLDQdG3dFcvZkOaJ?usp=drive_link

- Threats & Intimidation: The DGP violated my religious freedom (UDHR Art. 18/ICCPR Art. 18) by coercing me to abandon my beliefs—an unlawful act under international law.". He referred to KAILASA as “imaginary”, and played videos propagating hate speech about KAILASA, SPH and Vijayapriya.

- 36 Days of Illegal Captivity: In blatant violation of EG law (72-hour limit), authorities detained the nuns for over a month - no charges, no warrant, no extension order - revealing complete disregard for legal due process. During this time, they were denied their devices and contact with the external world.

Physical & Psychological Torture

- Brutal Beatings in Cell: They witnessed adolescent male and female detainees being beaten with rubber rods at night, with victims screaming in pain.

- Sleep Deprivation: Screams from tortured detainees, loud music from nearby bars, an overcrowded cell, and frequent police intrusions prevented sleep.

- Sexual Harassment: Male inmates and policemen ridiculed their celibacy, sexually harrassed them, and threatened to cut their sacred dreadlocks.

Inhumane Prison Conditions

- Overcrowded, Dark Cell: A 10x13 ft. concrete cell with no ventilation, one toilet, and no showers housed 15+ people, including men.

- Health Hazards: The cell was infested with cockroaches, lice, and blood-stained mattresses.

Denied Medical Care:

- Shivamaya (who has ankylosing spondylitis) was denied timely medication.

- Both contracted malaria and typhoid in detention but received treatment only after U.S. Embassy intervention.

Starvation:

- No food/water provided by authorities; they survived on crackers for a week until staff from their residence building brought meals.

Legal & Religious Rights Violations

- Denied Legal Counsel: Repeated requests for a lawyer or U.S. Embassy contact were ignored.

- Forced written declaration: The DG pressured Vijayapriya to sign a Spanish document (untranslated).

Religious Persecution:

- Worship items confiscated (claiming they could "kill themselves" with them).

- Prevented from performing daily Hindu rituals or yoga, and mocked for their dreadlocks and vegetarianism - Hindu indigenous lifestyle.

Coerced Video Statement & Extortion

- On Jan 18, 2025, the DG forced a video "confession", later edited and broadcast on the state TV (TVGE), inciting hate speech on SPH and KAILASA.

- Bail Extortion: Despite being declared innocent by the DG’s own investigation (within 8 days), they were told to pay $20,000.

- No Official Documents: To date, they have no court orders, case numbers, or proof of charges.

[]

[]

[]

[]

Conclusion

For Hindus, the label of "indigenous" is often denied, given the fact that India—the homeland of the Vedic civilization—has explicitly stated that the UNDRIP does not apply within its borders, as the concept of "indigenous" is deemed irrelevant to India’s civilizational context.

Yet, the truth is far deeper: Hindus are not only indigenous to India but across Asia—including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran, Sri Lanka, and Nepal—all of which were once flourishing Hindu nations.

The indigenous Hindu civilization was systematically fragmented through centuries of Islamic and Christian colonization and colonialism.

Today, those who identify as Muslim or Christian in these lands are, by definition, non-indigenous, as their religious and cultural roots trace back to foreign impositions rather than the native soil.

What is needed now is not mere decolonization—which often remains a superficial political process—but decoloniality: a complete civilizational reawakening.

SPH Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam is pioneering this movement by reviving KAILASA, the enlightened indigenous Hindu civilizational nation, and uniting indigenous peoples worldwide through the United Indigenous Nations (UAN) to reclaim Swaraj (self-rule).

This is why SPH and KAILASA face relentless persecution—not as an attack on one individual, but as an assault on the very right to self-determination and decolonial resurgence.

The ongoing persecution of SPH and KAILASA by deep state actors underscores the urgent need for international intervention.

The United Nations must take decisive action to investigate these systemic abuses, hold perpetrators accountable, and uphold the rights of Indigenous peoples as enshrined in the UNDRIP.

Only through global pressure and UN support can we dismantle these oppressive structures and ensure justice, sovereignty, and protection for Indigenous communities worldwide.