UN-report-31-subm-80th-session-un-cso-61-kailash-union

The Continuity of Colonial Violence: Systemic Persecution of Indigenous Hindus in Modern India

A report by Kailash Union

1. Introduction

The Vedic (Hindu) civilization represents a sophisticated, indigenous, and continuous tradition within Bharat[1] (modern-day India) and across the then 56 indigenous Hindu nations[2], its roots stretching back long before colonial interruptions.

Although India voted in favor of the UNDRIP in 2007 and ratified the ILO’s Convention 107[3], the government persistently rejects the term and concept of “Indigenous Peoples.” It asserts that all Indians are equally indigenous, a claim that falters when examined through the region’s civilizational lens.

This stance effectively precludes the “identification, documentation, demarcation, registration, and titling of Indigenous Peoples’ lands” in India, undermining the recognition of distinct indigenous Hindu identities.

This report exposes how India's post-colonial state machinery, while constitutionally secular, perpetuates British colonial frameworks to systematically oppress its indigenous Hindu majority.

Unlike Pakistan's overt Islamic identity, India's "secular" facade masks:

[]

A nation with 80% Hindu population legally disempowers its majority while minority-appeasement policies mirror divide-and-rule tactics of British Raj.

2. Hindu Indigeneity in Bharat

Christianity and Islam entered Bharat as external influences, distinct from its indigenous Vedic civilization.

Unlike the Vedic tradition, which evolved organically within Bharat’s landscape, Christianity arrived primarily through European colonial powers, driven by missionary zeal to convert and "civilize" the native population; Islam, was introduced earlier through invasions and conquests beginning in the 8th century, similarly imposed a foreign religious and cultural identity.

Crafted by 19th-century British scholars like Max Müller, promoted the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) portraying Vedic civilization as an external import, rather than an indigenous development.

Recent genetic studies affirm that Hindus alone embody the indigenous lineage of Bharat’s ancient civilizational heritage.

[]

[4]

3. Colonial Continuities in Hindu Persecution and Genocide

India’s Constitution reflects British policies like the 1919 Government of India Act, embedding a Christian-secular bias into the 1950 Constitution, prioritizing Western norms over indigenous values and perpetuating foreign dominance.

[]

3.1. Institutionalized Temple Slavery

3.1.1. British Legacy: Control of Hindu Temples

During British rule, Hindu temples were systematically targeted to weaken their influence as centers of social cohesion and cultural identity.

The British implemented laws such as the Madras Regulation VII (1817), Regulation XIX in Bengal (1810), and Bombay Regulation (1827) to take control of temple administration.[5]

These measures enabled the colonial government to manage temple properties and finances, undermining Hindu institutions while facilitating Christian missionary efforts.

3.1.2. Modern Reality: Government Control of Hindu Temples

Post-independence, the government of India continued the British legacy of controlling Hindu temples through laws like the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HRCE) Act.[6] [7]

[]

Hindus possess minimal to no control over temple funds for supporting charitable initiatives or safeguarding their indigenous cultural and knowledge heritage.

Instead, resources that could establish Vedic pathshalas, promote indigenous arts, music, and dance, or construct community hospitals are frequently diverted to projects that predominantly serve non-Hindu beneficiaries.[8]

3.1.3. Government Interference in Gurumahasannidhanam Succession Process

On January 20, 1979, the Tamil Nadu State HRCE implemented a scheme (OA No.1 of 1978) that mandates State approval of Gurumahasannidhanams (reincarnated Gurus) through a State-appointed Advisory Committee for them to be legally recognized, which is against the indigenous Mutts traditions.

Under the leadership of DMK, Tamil Nadu has been promoting Gurumahasannidhanams who align with the party's interests, such as the Dharmapuram Gurumahasannidhanam.[9]

This DMK-groomed Dharmapuram Gurumahasannidhanam, along with his disciple Justice Mahadevan of the Madras High Court (now elevated as a Justice of the Supreme Court of India), has actively campaigned for the arbitrary and unlawful removal of SPH as the 293rd pontiff of Madurai Aadheenam.[10]

On May 3, 2018, Justice Mahadevan escalated the situation by threatening SPH with arbitrary arrest through a court order.

Despite the threat, SPH persisted in entering Madurai Aadheenam after obtaining a stay order from a High Court division bench, upholding His position as the 293rd Pontiff. The judge openly vowed, "I will see that your ashram (monastery) is vanished."[11]

On November 23, 2020, the 232nd Pontiff of Thondaimandala Aadheenam, prior to his passing, exercised his traditional right to appoint his successor by “word of mouth”[12].

He expressed his final wish to Mr. Ganapathy, Secretary of Sekkizhar Kalvi Panpattu Kazhagam[13], that either SPH or a trusted disciple like Sri Nithya Sundareshwarananda be appointed as the succeeding pontiff.[14]

Yet, on February 16, 2021, Tamil Nadu appointed a Kattalai Thambiran[15] from Dharmapuram Adheenam—a Shaiva monastery led by a DMK-aligned pontiff—as the head of Thondaimandala Aadheenam, ousting the chosen 233rd successor, Sri Nithya Sundareshwarananda.

This is not an isolated case. On August 5, 1946, the 227th Gurumahasannidhanam of Thondaimandala Aadheenam was forcibly vanished.

Over time, the State of Tamil Nadu, influenced by political parties like the DMK, has made several appointments to the Thondaimandala Aadheenam based on political motives.

Such State-appointed designations have faced legal challenges and been overturned as illegal and invalid.[16]

Despite these rulings, State interference in religious matters and persecution by both the State and DMK-affiliated non-State actors have surged dramatically over the past two decades.

Tamil Nadu’s long-ruling DMK party has a long history of promoting anti-Hindu rhetoric and propaganda, and divisive politics as seen recently by calling Kannada and Telugu speaking people as 'Dravidians', when in reality the Aryan-Dravidian theory itself is a colonial construct in line with its divide-and-rule conspiracy.[17]

In 2023, the deputy Chief Minister of the State of Tamil Nadu, Udhayanidhi Stalin, compared Sanatan Dharma to diseases like dengue and malaria and called for its eradication.[18]

[]

3.1.4. 0% Control Over Mosques/Churches

Despite Article 26 of the Indian Constitution guaranteeing equal rights for all religious denominations to manage their institutions, only Hindu temples face government interference.

Mosques, churches, gurudwaras, and other religious institutions are free to manage their affairs without state intervention.[19]

In contrast, Hindus, who constitute nearly eighty percent of Bharat’s population, lack any legal claim to their indigenous lands owned by their temples.

3.2. Demographic Colonialism

3.2.1. The 1871 Criminal Tribes Act

The British colonizers distorted Hindu traditions, deliberately misinterpreting the Varna system as the root cause of all social evil.

Through census operations from 1840-1925, they forcibly categorized diverse communities into artificial constructs, shattering the social fabric.

This policy of institutionalized divide marginalized many, denying their birthright to practice Dharma freely under imposed colonial laws.[20]

In 1871, the word “caste” was used by the colonial government to force-fit people groups in a pseudo-identity framework based on surname, appearances, facial features, etc.[21]

The Criminal Tribes Act deprived several people groups of their inalienable universal human right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty (UN UDHR Article 11).[22]

Faulty generalizations coupled with negative stereotypes were applied to various people groups such as to indigenous Hindu scholars and priests who were presumed to be nepotistic by the virtue of their birth, surname, or profession[23], and similarly, all Hindu monastic orders (Sanyasis) were presumed to be criminals by birth as per CTA.

3.2.2. Missionary Enclaves

Under British rule, Hindu indigenous tribes faced forced conversion as colonial authorities and missionaries targeted their "heathen" practices, using education, coercion, and incentives to impose Christianity and erase tribal traditions.

Today, missionaries continue this legacy, exploiting economic vulnerabilities with aid and services to convert tribes, perpetuating the colonial disruption of indigenous cultures.

[]

[24]

3.2.3. Forest Rights Act

The Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, was enacted to recognize and restore the rights of Scheduled Tribes (STs) and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) over forest lands they have historically depended on.

However, according to data from the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) in 2023, out of 45.5 million claims filed under the FRA, 40% (18 million claims) have been rejected.[25] [26] [27]

[]

3.3. Legal Persecution

Enacted during colonial rule on November 25, 1870, Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was designed to suppress dissent against the British government.

Today, it is often criticized for being a tool of political repression.

Of the nearly 11,000 people charged in 816 sedition cases since 2010, 65% were charged after the Modi government came to power in 2014.[28]

One significant case is that of Saint Rampal, a global Hindu spiritual leader who founded the Kabir Panth-affiliated Satlok Ashram in Haryana.[29]

The Haryana government charged Saint Rampal and his followers with sedition under Section 124A of the IPC in November 2014.

The Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) clarified that sedition applies only to acts with a clear intent or tendency to incite violence or public disorder against the government, safeguarding free speech unless it crosses this threshold.

In Saint Rampal’s case, the standoff was a reaction to a specific legal summons rather than a coordinated effort to overthrow the government. No evidence has surfaced of speeches or writings explicitly calling for rebellion or hatred against the government as an institution.[30]

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which came into effect on July 1, 2024, replaced the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Unlike the IPC, which focused on disaffection toward the government, Section 152 broadens the offense to include acts threatening the abstract concepts of "sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India."[31]

National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data from 2015–2020 shows 548 arrests under Section 124A, with only 12 convictions in seven cases[32], highlighting a low conviction rate and suggesting frequent misuse as a tool for harassment rather than prosecution.

4. Case Study: Kashmir as Microcosm[33] [34]

Colonial Parallel

[]

[]

5. Modern Persecution Matrix

5.1. Misuse of the SC/ST Act to Fragment Tribes

The British colonial strategy of "Divide-and-Rule" was a deliberate policy to fragment indigenous communities along ethnic, religious, and caste lines to weaken collective resistance and maintain control.

In India, this manifested through the Census of 1871, which rigidly categorized castes and tribes, institutionalizing divisions that were previously more fluid.[35]

The British also selectively empowered certain groups (e.g., favoring Scheduled Castes in some regions while marginalizing tribes) to create social friction.[36]

Post-independence India retained colonial-era classifications, including the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act).

The Act’s stringent provisions (automatic arrests, non-bailable offenses) are exploited to settle personal vendettas, exacerbating inter-group tensions.[37]

This mirrors colonial tactics by pitting oppressed groups against each other, preventing unified resistance against systemic exploitation.

UN Violation: ICERD Article 2

The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), Article 2, obligates states to avoid divisive policies that perpetuate racial or ethnic hierarchies.

By maintaining colonial caste classifications and failing to prevent the misuse of laws like the SC/ST Act, India violates ICERD’s mandate to "not sponsor, defend, or support racial discrimination".

The UN Committee on Racial Discrimination (2019) has criticized India for institutionalizing caste divisions instead of fostering social harmony.

5.2. Land Revenue Acts

5.2.1. British Colonial Tool

The British colonial administration in India systematically dismantled traditional land ownership systems through Land Revenue Acts, which were designed to maximize extraction and control.

Key legislations like the Permanent Settlement Act (1793) and the Ryotwari System (1820s) converted communal tribal and peasant lands into taxable private property, displacing indigenous communities[38] [39].

5.2.2. Modern Weaponization in India: Forest Evictions for Corporates

Post-independence India retained colonial-era land laws, and recent policies have weaponized forest and land laws to evict indigenous people for corporate interests.

Key mechanisms include:[40] [41] [42]

[]

UN Violation: UNDRIP Article 10

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Article 10, states:

"Indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands… No relocation shall take place without free, prior, and informed consent."

India’s forest evictions and land acquisitions violate this principle by:[43] [44]

[]

5.2.3. KAILASA’s Struggle to Protect Temple Land and Deities in India

A. Rajapalayam and Seithur

2003: Land Gifts & Spiritual Foundation[45] [46]

[]

2010–2012: Legal Battles[47] [48] [49]

[]

2019-2024: Violent Attacks & Arson[50] [51] [52] [53]

[]

[]

2025: State-Sanctioned Violence[54] [55]

[]

B. KAILASA Trishulam Chennai

The case of KAILASA Trishulam Chennai is one more such instance of lawfare and attempt to illegally forcefully evict the residents of KAILASA.

The case highlights land grabbing, misuse of repealed laws, and state high-handedness.

[]

[]

[56]

5.3. Missionary Education

The British colonial administration introduced a formal education system in India through the Charter Act of 1813.

The Act was enforced to spread malicious disinformation that the indigenous Hindu sciences are unscientific and declared the literature, history, metaphysics, and theology of Hinduism to be “absurd”[57] [58], and completely replaced the Gurukuls (indigenous Hindu schools) with institutions that prioritized Christian curricula.

Modern Weaponization: Anti-Hindu Bias in Education

India's current education system continues to alienate Hindu heritage through curriculum design and institutional policies.[59] [60]

[]

[]

[61]

UN Violation: ICCPR Article 18

The ICCPR emphasizes that education should respect cultural diversity and promote understanding among various communities. However, India's education system fails to adequately represent Hindu traditions while accommodating other religious groups disproportionately.

5.4. Diplomatic Gaslighting

The Systemic Persecution & Obstruction of Hindu Religious Celebration in The Gambia

In February-March 2025, a coordinated campaign targeted the Kumbh Mela, a Hindu peace event in The Gambia organized by a monk of KAILASA’s Nithyananda Order.

External political forces, using local proxies, spread disinformation, hate speech, and threats to suppress it, reflecting a wider trend against indigenous Hindu groups.

The sacred gathering, aimed at promoting peace and unity, faced false alerts, participant intimidation, and threats to supporters from the start.

Key Acts of Persecution

[]

Evidence of Deep State Involvement[62]

- The repetition of identical threats (passport cancellations, embassy interference) suggests a systematic playbook.

- The use of diplomatic channels to spread disinformation indicates state-linked actors.

Violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)

The Vienna Convention establishes the framework for diplomatic conduct, emphasizing mutual respect and non-interference in host states' affairs.

When diplomatic missions engage in psychological manipulation, harassment, or intimidation against critics they violate the principle that diplomacy should not be weaponized to stifle free expression.

6. Decoloniality through the Revival of KAILASA

Decoloniality emerges as a radical challenge to Eurocentrism's universalist claims, advocating not just for political independence but for the restoration of indigenous ways of knowing, being, and governing.

Crowned as the Sovereign of 21 ancient indigenous Hindu kingdoms of Bharat, The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam, hailing from the minority Aboriginal Indigenous Agricultural Tribe (AIAT)[63], revived KAILASA—the Ancient Enlightened Hindu Civilizational Nation—by reuniting these 21 kingdoms, as a testament that decoloniality and Hindu Swaraj (Self-Governance) is possible.

6.1. Illegal Annexation of Indigenous Hindu Sovereign Lands

At the time of British withdrawal from India in 1947, the Indian subcontinent officially comprised 565 independent indigenous Hindu sovereign princely states.[64]

Among these was the Surangi Kingdom.[65]

Despite the "Instrument of Accession" preserving their sovereignty in theory[66], these states faced forced annexation after ceding their territories, resulting in the unlawful stripping of their autonomous status.

Moreover, the Hindu rulers of these states were enticed into compliance with promises of a personal "privy purse"[67] [68]—a financial incentive later revoked unilaterally[69]—leading them to compromise their traditional Hindu values and constitutional integrity.

Such annexation by force and inducement through corruption contravenes international law, violating principles enshrined in various legal frameworks and customary international norms.[70]

[]

[71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77]

6.2. The Juridical Statehood of KAILASA

KAILASA is a sovereign subject of international law-possessing distinctive attributes, derived from SPH’s inheritance of the unbroken succession and the revival of 21 ancient Hindu sovereign states and ecclesiastical historical institutions.[78] [79]

[]

[80]

6.3. Doctrine of Continuity

International law recognizes a state's legal personality by recognizing its identity. This perspective extends to periods of annexation or occupation, where the legal personality of a state is considered to persist, enabling its subsequent re-establishment.[81]

While the territory of the Surangi Kingdom was annexed unlawfully, KAILASA has no territorial conflict with the Republic of India or any other nation and does not claim any territorial rights over its erstwhile territories.

KAILASA is a government-in-exile.[82] In 2003, SPH relocated KAILASA government-in-exile to Los Angeles, California.

[]

By the doctrine of continuity[83] legal facts in the context of the history of the Hindu sovereign State of the Surangi Kingdom, SPH derives all sovereign rights and powers of the royal lineage as the Sovereign from His inheritance and continuation of the unbroken succession of the Surangi Kingdom.[84] [85] [86]

6.4. Doctrine of Acquired Rights[87] [88] [89] [90]

Sovereign powers and rights acquired from the various lineages of these ancient sovereign Hindu states by SPH through succession as the Sovereign of these states and KAILASA through the unification of these states are absolute, undisputed, and additionally endorsed by the Republic of India through its treaty obligations.

6.5. Rights of the Deity and legal principles of Divine Sovereignty

The concept of Divine Sovereignty is universally recognized[91] and the concept of temple Deities owning property is a well-established legal principle.[92]

In the case of Hindu Temples where the Deity is the owner of the temple and attached properties, the Presiding Deity of the Hindu Kingdom is the Sovereign of the Kingdom.

The King of a Hindu nation was a mere regent of the Lord[93], similarly to how the executive officers of the temples are mere servants[94] of the presiding Deity.

Additionally, non-Hindu practitioners cannot be trustees, executive officers, or personnel in the Hindu temples[95], and therefore, non-Hindus entities cannot take over a Hindu nation, or the non-Hindu government cannot run or annex a Hindu kingdom[96].

Given the Doctrine of Continuity, the rights of the Deity and legal principles of Divine Sovereignty, Nehru’s annexation of Hindu kingdoms under a non-Hindu framework was unlawful[97] [98].

6.6. De Jure and De Facto[99] Statehood [100]

[]

[101] [102] [103]

[]

[104] [105]

6.7. KAILASA’s Perpetual Existence

KAILASA within its historical cultural, religious legal framework has and shall remain in perpetuity in the future, notwithstanding the impacts of climate change during the time of Kumari Kandam[106], colonial legacies, annexation of territories by modern states and upheavals resulting in loss of physical territory.

7. Oppression by the Deep State: The Struggle to Reclaim Self-Determination

Malicious elements within India’s Deep State, fueled by anti-Hindu prejudice, have systematically targeted SPH for His bold revival of KAILASA—a sacred, sovereign representation of ancient indigenous Hindu civilization—and His efforts to empower indigenous nations worldwide through the United Ancient Nations.

This historic intergovernmental alliance, founded by SPH, unites over 125 indigenous nations and communities worldwide in their collective pursuit of spiritual, cultural, and political sovereignty.

The persecution began on March 2, 2010, when Hinduphobic forces, through media outlets like Sun TV[107] and Nakkheeran[108], released a deep fake video to incite lawfare, hatred and violence against SPH.[109] [110] [111]

What followed was a deluge of over 17,000 hours of online hate speech and 25,000 print articles, marking the start of nearly two decades of relentless attacks on SPH—the Ecclesiastical Head of two billion Hindus—and KAILASA.[112]

Ma Nithyananda Mayi Swami’s life took a tragic turn when the morphed video, falsely implicating her with SPH, was broadcast on Sun TV, leading to sensationalized media coverage that damaged her reputation and career without verification.[113]

This media-driven witch hunt persisted into February and March 2023, when H.E. Vijayapriya Nithyananda, a KAILASA Ambassador and Hindu Nun of the Sovereign Order of KAILASA’s Nithyananda, delivered an official statement at the United Nations addressing the ongoing persecution.

Her remarks triggered an unprecedented global backlash, with over 1,000 media stories aimed at delegitimizing SPH and KAILASA’s statehood.[114] [115]

The smear campaign escalated again in November 2023, when KAILASA established bilateral relations with two municipalities in Paraguay[116].

Major Hinduphobic media outlets—including Fox News, The Guardian, BBC, and CBC Canada—unleashed a barrage of attacks, branding SPH as “Nithyananda, facing multiple charges in India” and “a fugitive Indian guru,” while dismissing KAILASA, an indigenous nation, as a “fictional country.”[117] [118]

In March 2025, the pattern repeated as over 100[119] racist, anti-indigenous media outlets[120] from Bolivia, India, and beyond launched fresh hate speech and lawfare, once again labeling KAILASA a “fictional nation” and defaming SPH as a “self-proclaimed god-man.”

The strategy remains consistent: socially vilify, delegitimize KAILASA, and pressure entities to retract support.

This orchestrated campaign lays bare the Islamo-Leftist lobby’s deep-seated fear of a Dharmic resurgence and their frantic efforts to stifle indigenous sovereignty.

[]

[121] [122]

[]

[123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130]

[]

[131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141]

7.1. The Denial of Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) in India

The Dhyanapeeta Charitable Trust, established in 2001, promotes yoga, spirituality, and social welfare through initiatives like free food distribution, medical camps, and disaster relief.

It received FCRA registration in 2006, renewed in 2016, allowing it to accept foreign funds.

However, its 2021 renewal application was denied in 2024 without proper justification, severely disrupting its operations.

FCRA Denial & Legal Violations

[]

Broader Context of FCRA Misuse

- The 2025 USCIRF report highlights India’s misuse of FCRA to target NGOs, religious minorities, and human rights groups.

- Over 20,000 FCRA registrations have been canceled since 2012, indicating systemic suppression.

Impact on the Trust

[]

Legal Challenge: The Trust has filed a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court[142].

7.2. Systematic Persecution of KAILASA in Bolivia: Violations of Indigenous Rights & International Law Amidst Legally Ratified Agreements

KAILASA and Bolivian indigenous nations signed mutually beneficial agreements, with KAILASA providing financial aid, humanitarian support, and social services like free education, meals, and healthcare, in line with their constitutional right to self-determination.[143]

A coordinated campaign of persecution against the Hindu monks and nun of the Sovereign Order of KAILASA’s Nithyananda was orchestrated by the anti-indigenous deep state in Bolivia, involving media disinformation and hate speech, physical attacks, unlawful detention, and human rights violations under both Bolivian and international law.

Key Incidents

1. Persecution of Male Monks (March 20, 2025, Beni Department)[144]

[]

2. Persecution of Female Monks (March 21–23, 2025, Santa Cruz & La Paz)[145]

[]

Legal & Human Rights Violations

[]

Lawfare

- Fabricated claims: Media accused KAILASA of exploiting indigenous lands by coercing Indigenous nations into signing agreements, despite legally ratified, notarized and protocolized agreements and despite obtaining written community consent prior to the execution of any given agreement.

Despite facing persecution fueled by Hinduphobic rhetoric, racial discrimination, and anti-indigenous agendas propagated by certain political and media factions, Bolivia's indigenous communities remain steadfast in their alliance with KAILASA, continuing to uphold their partnership with resolute solidarity.

7.3. State-Sponsored Brutality: The Illegal Detention, Torture, and Religious Persecution in Equatorial Guinea[146]

KAILASA’s Ambassador Ma Vijayapriya Nithyananda and Ma Nithya Shivamayananda went to Equatorial Guinea (EG) to set up humanitarian services under a treaty signed by EG’s Vice President and authenticated by the embassy of EG in Congo, the Attorney General and high-level officials at the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

After over a year in the country, they faced false accusations of falsified documents and endured 36 days of illegal detention, torture, and human rights abuses by EG’s National Gendarmerie.

Key Events & Violations

1. Illegal Arrest & Detention (December 17, 2024 - January 21, 2025)

[]

2. Physical & Psychological Torture

[]

3. Inhumane Prison Conditions

[]

4. Legal & Religious Rights Violations

[]

5. Coerced Video Statement & Extortion

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

8. Recommendations

1. UN Audit of India's Temple Wealth Confiscation Under CERD General Recommendation 23, which protects indigenous and tribal peoples' rights over their cultural and religious heritage.

2. Special Rapporteur Visit to Investigate Tribal Conversions

3. UN General Assembly Resolution Condemning Secularism as Majoritarian Persecution

The UN General Assembly should pass a resolution recognizing the misuse of secularism as a tool for majoritarian persecution in India.

[1] https://archive.org/details/india-that-is-bharat-9789354350047_compress

[2] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H7OJADdrFjrdl8nR5KMuc7sJkG6zXOob0K6X5wbmBno/view

[3] C.R. Bijoy, Shankar Gopalakrishnan, and Shomona Khanna, India and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2010. Accessed 16, August 2016 from

http://aippnet.org/india-and-the-rights-of-Indigenouspeoples-2/

[4] https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.15.580575v2#:~:text=India%20has%20been%20underrepresented%20in,archaic%20hominins%2C%20Neanderthals%20and%20Denisovans.

[5] https://stophindudvesha.org/state-control-of-hindu-temples-in-india-a-historical-perspective/

[6] https://stophindudvesha.org/state-control-of-hindu-temples-in-india-a-historical-perspective/

[7] https://www.boloji.com/articles/54504/why-are-only-hindu-temples-under-government-control

[8] Only in India can you step aside and watch as the State appoints non-Hindus – Muslims like Firhad Hakim, Christians like Vangalpudi Anita – on boards that control Hindu temples. Only in India will the Hindus remain silent as their temple idols are stolen, temple property auctioned, and the whole temple-driven ecosystem and its way of life dismantled. Assault on temples has turned into an assault on Hinduism itself. Imagine a Hindu priest or a politician controlling and dictating how St. Frances Church or the Jama Masjid should be run. If that happens, perhaps our judiciary would indeed conduct a midnight hearing, crying death of secularism.

- Anand Ranganathan’s Hindus in Hindu Rashtra, Ibid. p.6

[9] https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Tiruchirapalli/pontiffs-of-ancient-shaivite-mutts-congratulate-stalin/article34482675.ece

[10] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/Mutt-heads-join-hands-against-Nithyananda/articleshow/13128312.cms

[11] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/madras-hc-warns-of-issuing-arrest-warrant-against-self-styled-godman-nithyananda/articleshow/62692301.cms

[12] The Supreme Court of India, Sri Mahalinga Thambiran Swamigal vs His Holiness Sri La Sri Kasivasi on 19 October, 1973 “There can be no dispute that a nomination can be made by deed or word of mouth” , 1974 AIR 199, 1974 SCR (2) 74, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/307513/

[13] The largest group of Thondai Mandala AIAT disciples initiated with Samaya Deeksha

[14] Final words of the 232nd pontiff, “நல்ல நல்ல சிறந்த கல்வி அறிவும் சிறந்த வயதும் நநர்மமயான குணமும் நித்யானந்தாவிற்கு ஆசபட்டவருமாக நித்யானந்தாவற்கு வர்ரது நம்ம மடத்துக்கு எப்பவும் நசப்ட்டி. முதலியார்கள் நாலுநபர் நல்லநபரு சசால்லி நித்யானந்தர் நபமர சசான்னா இப்ப நீங்க சசான்ன நபர்கள் எல்லாம் நல்ல சிறந்த கல்வி அறிவும், சிறந்த வயதும், நநர்மமயான குணமும், பிரத்தியார் காசுக்கு ஆமசப்படாதவறும் நித்யானந்தாவிற்கு வற்ரது நம்ம மடத்துக்கு எப்பவும். என்ன .…”

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WU6xlLNx77pIeU2cKHZRjqcLcoEsQdqL/view

[15] Thambirans are clergymen ordained for various religious duties in the monastery. Kattalai Thambiran is head of the administration and can be selected to be the next successor pontiff.

[16] 16 Nov 1959, in W.P.No. 261 of 1959

[17] https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/kannadigas-are-not-dravidians-tamil-nadu-cm-mk-stalins-ugadi-wishes-spark-debate/ar-AA1BYhrV?ocid=BingNewsSerp

[18] https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/udhayanidhi-stalin-mk-stalin-sanatan-dharma-like-dengue-malaria-mk-stalins-son-triggers-row-4354704

https://economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/sanatana-dharma-row-how-stalin-jrs-remark-sparked-a-political-storm-ahead-of-the-2024-elections/articleshow/103351723.cms

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/udhayanidhi-stalin-sanatana-dharma-malaria-dengue-sparks-row-tamil-nadu-2430231-2023-09-02

[19] https://stophindudvesha.org/the-battle-for-hindu-temples-why-they-must-be-liberated-from-state-control/

https://www.ndtv.com/opinion/is-it-time-to-free-hindu-religious-institutions-from-state-control-6654826

https://iskconnews.org/government-control-weakens-indias-temples/

[20] "caste". Oxford English Dictionary

[21] https://censusindia.gov.in/DigitalLibrary/data/Census_1881/Publication/India/1A-Memorandum%20on%20the%20census%20of%20British%20India,%201871-1872.pdf

[22] - While the four Varnas of Hinduism that are defined based on Karmas (actions motivated by individual worldview and pursuits of life) and Gunas (Activism, that is, number of active working hours per day) are a form of self-declaration and subjective fluid classification, and the 3000 Jatis are endogamous people groups with 25,000 Upjatis that include exogamous Gotra groups, the 1871 census and later literature faultily generalized the 25,000 people groups into a force-fitted classification using the same verbiage as of four Varnas which was contrary to both practical indigenous lifestyle experience and written scriptures.

This faulty generalization is described by William Robert Cornish, who supervised colonial government census operations in the Madras Presidency in 1871, as “Whether there was ever a period in which the Hindus were composed of four classes is exceedingly doubtful".

- Mahābhārata (Vana-parva, chapter 177, verse 20), “śūdre caitad-bhavel-lakṣma dvije tac ca na vidyate। na vai śūdro bhavec-chudro brāhmaṇo na ca brāhmaṇoḥ॥” “If someone born a śūdra possesses the characteristics of a brāhmaṇa and someone born a brāhmaṇa does not, that śūdra should not be known as a śūdra, and that brāhmaṇa should not be known as a brāhmaṇa.”

-https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/young-angry-and-untouchable-indias-low-caste-threat-to-modi/articleshow/67589578.cms

-https://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/08/17/india.caste/

- Dirks (2001). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

-Dumont, Louis (1980), Homo Hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications, University of Chicago Press, pp. 66-67 ISBN 0-226-16963-4

[23] Diehl, Anita (1977). E. V. Ramaswami Naicker-Periar: A study of the influence of a personality in contemporary South India. Sweden: Scandinavian University Books. ISBN 978-91-24-27645-4.

[24] https://blog.cpsindia.org/2016/08/religion-data-of-census-2011-xxviii.html

https://swarajyamag.com/culture/how-northeast-india-was-christianised-in-the-last-100-years

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_India

[25] https://economictimes.com/news/india/40-land-claims-by-tribals-rejected-by-state-govts/articleshow/103997807.cms

[26] https://economictimes.com/news/india/40-land-claims-by-tribals-rejected-by-state-govts/articleshow/103997807.cms

[27] Reasons cited for rejections include lack of documentary evidence, claims on non-forest land, or non-compliance with eligibility criteria.

https://www.deccanherald.com/india/forest-rights-act-encroachment-non-occupation-chief-reasons-behind-rejection-of-a-majority-of-claims-1201309.html

Many rejections occur at the sub-divisional or district-level committees without adequate review or adherence to legal guidelines.

https://science.thewire.in/politics/government/supreme-court-forest-rights-eviction/

Gram Sabhas and applicants are often not informed about reasons for rejections, denying them the opportunity to appeal46.

https://science.thewire.in/politics/government/supreme-court-forest-rights-eviction/

https://scroll.in/article/914404/five-reasons-why-claims-by-forest-dwellers-for-their-land-are-low-and-rejections-are-high

Forest officials often dominate decision-making processes, leading to biases against claimants.

https://india.mongabay.com/2024/04/more-than-15-years-on-implementation-of-forest-right-act-is-lagging-new-report-finds/

Some rejections are based on dubious grounds, such as claims being in protected areas or alleged encroachments, which experts argue are invalid under FRA guidelines.

https://www.downtoearth.org.in/forests/ifr-review-states-do-dubious-paperwork-cite-baseless-reasons-for-refusing-forest-rights-to-tribals-dte-finds-87939

https://www.downtoearth.org.in/forests/ifr-review-here-are-some-possible-repercussions-of-rejecting-reviewed-forest-right-claims-87960

Many forest dwellers are unaware of their rights under the FRA or lack access to legal and administrative support to file claims effectively.

https://india.mongabay.com/2024/04/more-than-15-years-on-implementation-of-forest-right-act-is-lagging-new-report-finds/

States often fail to proactively implement FRA provisions or conduct reviews of rejected claims as mandated by law.

https://economictimes.com/news/india/40-land-claims-by-tribals-rejected-by-state-govts/articleshow/103997807.cms

https://www.downtoearth.org.in/forests/ifr-review-states-do-dubious-paperwork-cite-baseless-reasons-for-refusing-forest-rights-to-tribals-dte-finds-87939

Threat of Evictions: Nearly 1.6 million families face eviction risks due to rejected claims, despite protections under Section 4(5) of the FRA that prohibit eviction until claim processes are complete.

https://science.thewire.in/politics/government/supreme-court-forest-rights-eviction/

https://www.downtoearth.org.in/forests/ifr-review-here-are-some-possible-repercussions-of-rejecting-reviewed-forest-right-claims-87960

Loss of Livelihoods: Rejected claimants risk losing access to ancestral lands critical for their survival.

[28] https://www.hindutvawatch.org/explainer-how-the-sedition-law-has-been-used-in-the-modi-era/

[29] He gained a significant following by preaching a blend of Saint Kabir’s teachings and his own interpretations, often clashing with mainstream religious groups.

[30] Additionally, violence or public disorder must be directly tied to an intent to destabilize the government, not just law enforcement. In Saint Rampal’s Case, the clashes involved followers resisting police attempts to enter the ashram, resulting in localized violence, rather than a premeditated campaign against the state.

Other IPC provisions (e.g., Sections 147 for rioting, 353 for assaulting public servants) could address this without invoking sedition, which carries a higher threshold.

Cases like Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab (1995), where the Supreme Court ruled that mere sloganeering without public disorder does not constitute sedition, suggests that localized resistance, even if violent, does not automatically meet the sedition threshold unless it threatens the government’s stability.

The Supreme Court’s 2022 stay on Section 124A (in S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India) further reflects broader concerns about its misuse, though this came after Rampal’s case.

[31] The penalty is harsher—imprisonment for life or up to seven years, plus a fine—with no option for a fine alone, removing judicial leniency present in the IPC.

[32] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/of-548-held-just-12-in-7-cases-convicted/articleshow/91451710.cms

[33] https://www.rockandart.org/british-colonialism-india-kashmir/

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Article-370-of-the-Constitution-of-India

[34] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmiri_Pandits

[35] Dirks, N. (2001). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India.

[36] Bates, C. (1995). Race, Caste and Tribe in Central India: The Early Origins of Indian Anthropometry.

[37] Teltumbde, A. (2018). Republic of Caste: Thinking Equality in the Time of Neoliberal Hindutva.

[38] Guha, R. (1983). The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance.

[39] These laws:

Dispossessed indigenous people of their ancestral lands by imposing cash taxes, forcing them into debt and alienation.

Bhattacharya, Neeladri. (1991). "Colonial State and Agrarian Society." In Situating Indian History: For Sarvepalli Gopal (pp. 106-145), edited by S. Bhattacharya and Romila Thapar. Oxford University Press.

Enabled zamindars (landlords) and moneylenders to seize tribal lands, leading to mass displacement.

Sundar, N. (1997). Subalterns and Sovereigns: An Anthropological History of Bastar.

Facilitated commercial exploitation of forests and minerals, disregarding indigenous right.

Rangarajan, Mahesh. (1996). "Fencing the Forest: Conservation and Ecological Change in India’s Central Provinces, 1860–1914." Modern Asian Studies, 30(2), 361-389.

[40] Bijoy, C. R. (2008). "Forest Rights Act: Undoing Historical Injustices." EPW.

[41] Levien, M. (2018). Dispossession Without Development: Land Grabs in Neoliberal India.

[42] https://iwgia.org/en/india/3314-millions%20-of-pueblos-ind%C3%ADgenas-que-enfrentan-el-desalojo-india.html#:~:text=eviction%20in%20India-,Millions%20of%20forest%2Ddwelling%20indigenous%20peoples%20are%20facing%20eviction%20in,home%20in%20India%20is%20catastrophic. https://frontline.thehindu.com/news/supreme-court-forest-rights-act-case-tribal-communities-forest-dwellers/article69381592.ece

[43] Amnesty International (2016). When Land is Lost, Do We Eat Coal?

[44] Xaxa Committee (2014). Report on Socio-Economic Status of Tribal Communities.

[45] [Seithur Gift Deed Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1de3Rz2JkHRqt2A8BKBSwD62RBknBycu2 [Samsigapuram Gift Deed Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1st/1aKhJt4epZSA3SBefeX6j8R_Ba0p8QuqM

[46] [Mahasaptayagam] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T1g2sFxt-MjwtRfFIXyRh7jkjDz1hWEa/view?usp=drivesdk

[Satsang Video] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1We64GSwQn1BHcMQbdH65zf_1q4x-SylB/view?usp=drivesdk

[Padayatra] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rG0SATVfu-mFRffnTYGDWATl_KHU_1XH

[Organic Farm Inauguration] https://drive.google.com/file/d/16OaF5GAhLYa2GB219HRKZ9arb4UpCur-/view?usp=drive_link [Meditation hall inauguration] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HPJOEKikyFWH_96jWoKaHxOEdsUblaJv?usp=drive_link [Padayatra Photos] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12UGEKNkCs9zsxnDtdpF6VTEU0RMe7XqF?usp=drive_link

[Meditation Program] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-T3DNzwPAAcvH-IUyGdN5B5-FnyJw9-s?usp=drive_link

[Meeting with Hindu Leaders] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jvKvqzmrJWMMvIf09SHLomu6poSueQT9?usp=drive_link

[School Inauguration] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1OuzwcqBT2aeSSp_UJDMX7VaTj9nHrpAU

[Pongal Harvest Ritual] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KZCNfH4Q1L_XufJAAnq5BM7hQ1L2WIKw?usp=drive_link

Construction of temple https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KZCNfH4Q1L_XufJAAnq5BM7hQ1L2WIKw?usp=drive_link

[47] [Samsigapuram Cancellation] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1ue-Xriy6D9CALlvsmyz_qWOFMh4V5I5r

[Seithur Cancellation] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1NM__BmP5gynpz5zTmeKXlKZThyccfHxh

[Property Seizure Attempts] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LcFKY5uRuZpkYRJmtSa943LdAJvATbrb?usp=drive_link [Property Seizure Attempts] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LcFKY5uRuZpkYRJmtSa943LdAJvATbrb?usp=drive_link

[48] [FIR Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1meTFWn5lmj_0oWCIxXIkpCZW1HOo48Xf/view?usp=drive_link

[49] [Not Press Memo] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nZOwKUw-UEtejiARypwYzsQMwmAYpk0a/view?usp=drive_link

[Court Dismissal Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1cxUxmqSdwb3xUxQTmg93zIkGsyZGn3iV

[50] [2019 Attack Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1lZSJv5WwoOxXftublmupXzk-URPgT39l

[51] [2023 Lawsuit Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1wfABK01KgWWTjtw5b-LZ7TwsUWOLCJLJ

[52] [O.S. No. 33/2024 Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Dv_nPr5bOgOorqQpTaKrS5r4BnIP7D_c

[Police Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Njg_6zKHDSjzkNn-uNJSzxADNzjS3Yni

[Police Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Njg_6zKHDSjzkNn-uNJSzxADNzjS3Yni

[Morning Threats Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1i_NIYCQ7tBkue-yJK7yfClepiCmL5RBR?usp=drive_link [Surekha’s Call Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tof3T4CDSNgLRimfHjrl-yiPN5cJcBZ5/view?usp=drive_link

[Lady Sanyasis Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tCaQfzUtkFXgLcy5FtFyw4213Tbj0UbP?usp=drive_link [Post-Dawn Threats Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Ybg9VSl2VbzjDN8eZTlo7TZetH6bRA1m

[Online Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1Sr4-ZYIvRz39ZgNw2MDuphianfJcCYHz

[SP Complaint Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1jkHUyn9QSSyyEFKSPnpgGpiQeHoayFPH

[Registered Mail Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1VRvJbtjh8nslVxxBv64v1p1dY8U405be

[53] Chats with Murali Krishna, brother of DSP Preethi, reveal a sinister pattern of intimidation and manipulation. On June 28, he insisted “intervention” was mandatory

[June 28 Chat Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aJX4ilD5H0TUvNzNiYryKTE78Vrcz1Ga/view?usp=drive_link

By September 24, he spread false news of arrests and bail - [September 24 Chat Evidence]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zIgkrEvfOkmRixnyaBmoc44Y-SQpot05/view?usp=drive_link followed by a September 30 attempt to broker a settlement

[September 30 Chat Evidence] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vHUE6Zq81rDbpalWAMs3NCmUl2y0bLXY/view?usp=drive_link

On October 3, he threatened property seizure, predating an illegal complaint and summons https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OoQLdTip7FGx2t35K8sp0xzrAxZ51eD4/view?usp=drive_link

These exchanges suggest a coordinated effort to undermine the trust, with police complicity a recurring theme.

[Summons Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1DHkdv4c6vMs_l0eIR301V7hjyqsx5xaL

[Deepa’s Inquiry Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/12lxKPVLpD6YxSo4TTMutNi0ygk_9A_ud

[Sureka’s Inquiry Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1FWPyslw4VDvpkRz3lywGSf9ogweyNnbD

[Summons]https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1DHkdv4c6vMs_l0eIR301V7hjyqsx5xaL

[Deepa’s Inquiry] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/12lxKPVLpD6YxSo4TTMutNi0ygk_9A_ud

[Sureka’s Request] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1vBt8NWn-iO-YBJG6xZiFQ-0if34kquNG

[Sureka’s Inquiry] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1FWPyslw4VDvpkRz3lywGSf9ogweyNnbD

[54] [Police Demand Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1o64CzVPo3s9akurCSeUz5ePKurz_Xlpj

[Order Received Evidence] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1R9Qk_6ShrTteUz61FQSl2CJVj25rnw8V

The detailed video evidences of the same captured by both Kailasa and the press are at (305) Persecution of KAILASA Rajapalayam and Seithur - YouTube.

The evidence—[Police Demand] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1o64CzVPo3s9akurCSeUz5ePKurz_Xlpj

[Order Received] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1R9Qk_6ShrTteUz61FQSl2CJVj25rnw8V

[Court Stay Order on the Illegal Order of Sub Collector] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xDhmyleKuP2wjrzvVs9lxKgvn1X8WAkG/view?usp=drive_link

[55] Upon subsequent discovery of the order, it became evident that the mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 164 of the BNSS were disregarded. The provision explicitly requires an Executive Magistrate to:

Issue a reasoned written order specifying the grounds for action; and

Provide formal notice to affected parties, ensuring an opportunity to be heard.

The failure to adhere to these statutory obligations resulted in a denial of the Trust’s right to a fair hearing, rendering the order procedurally defective. This omission suggests either administrative negligence or a deliberate circumvention of due process, warranting judicial scrutiny.

The circumstances indicate a breach of fundamental legal principles, necessitating appropriate remedial action to rectify the denial of justice.

[56] Video evidence

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1rxaVE3RyVUm0CNw7Bd_I5Ru-kJLx46Mj?usp=drive_link

[57] https://www.jstor.org/stable/4027833

[58] while the impact of indigenous Hindu knowledge and education system has been appreciated by several Nobel laureates and world leaders of thought like Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, Albert Einstein and George Oppenheimer

[59] https://stophindudvesha.org/unveiling-the-biases-in-indian-education-how-it-alienates-youth-from-their-own-heritage/

[60] https://intellectualkshatriya.com/indias-veda-phobic-educational-system-constitutionalhinduphobia/

[61] http://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/gurukul/Letter_CWC_Representative_Radhka._K_17-Sep-2013.png

http://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/gurukul/CWC_Representatives_17-Sep-2013.png

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/city-others/nithyananda-ashram-produces-88-students-before-child-welfare-panel/

http://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/gurukul/Kannada_language_tv_news_channel_tv9_15-Oct-2013.png

https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/expression/cfis/conflict/2022-10-07/submission-disinformation-and-freedom-of-expression-during-armed-conflict-UNGA77-cso-kailash-union.pdf

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q1N4A4BrjwMzIWFNby-Gt8kBQw8Qz95Z7Z16M4EK4q8/edit?usp=sharing

https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/Corpus-Dei-Implant.pdf

https://jesusmeditation.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/christ-consciousness.pdf; https://oig-movement.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/7/5/127507372/oigo-declaration.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGF4CQSpnLY

https://www.facebook.com/100005995330313/videos/1174509229425577/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/exposed-fathers-irregularities-older-daughter-says/articleshow/72284662.cms

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/nithyananda-ashram-case-two-missing-women-file-affidavit-from-4th-country-6220352/

https://www.republicworld.com/india-news/general-news/exclusive-nithyanandas-petition-to-un-maligns-india.html

https://nithyanandatruth.org/2013/10/20/repeated-harassment-by-officials-of-women-and-child-department/

https://kailaasa.org/briefings-statements/grand-legal-victory-for-kailasas-hindus-false-charges-against-the-sph-nithyananda-paramashivam-dismissed-by-honble-high-court-of-gujarat-in-india/

[62] Whatsapp message - Indian consul, Ram Mohan, mentioning that KAILASA is on red corner

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ShDptfM4NdkcvyXOeJIJpoP0xd1vQsdm/view?usp=drive_link

01.19.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan mentioning that KAILASA institution is on a red corner alert

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1166RV0mfZON9mEN0i83l1ApUjQdU5HP5/view?usp=drive_link

01.02.2023 Voice recording - Sakshi received a threatening phone call from Ram Mohan

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bpgra64ZKX1WIm3OfYhp1h-qVBCbjkno/view?usp=drive_link

02.03.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan gave threat message to Sakshi

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VymJeZq_x_wIq0jcFneNRKEegeExz9pS/view?usp=drive_link

02.04.2025 Voice recording - Out of fear backed off from offering swimming pool & financial support

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NBBE3LJDFBayklGSFZeFSYvwu46BNESn/view?usp=drive_link

02.03.2025 Voice recording - Nandu telling to cancel Kumbh Mela

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xchNiwmr_-Mq69gmnM3-BdWO5P_JE2r4/view?usp=drive_link

02.04.2025 Voice recording - Nandu telling to cancel Kumbh Mela

https://drive.google.com/file/d/12-RCxt-mENamrktKOMbFLdtwgqYdhpLU/view?usp=drive_link

02.11.2025 Voice recording - 2nd attempt - new whatsApp group Kumbh to Mahadev

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t0rEyzxHW7y0_TQrBg_COOjrTmkbEHN4/view?usp=drive_link

03.13.2025 Voice recording of Sanju Ram Mohan meeting with Indian group and said Indian passport will be cancelled

https://drive.google.com/file/d/18T9zxOqX5uzO1urNSQy2WSY8XBYQgxqq/view?usp=drive_link

03.14.2025 Voice recording - Ram Mohan said he received a letter from the Government of India who will cancel the passports of participants of the Kumbh Mela

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iNGK-FaoErnZTyMC3JNru8jDBDmjAuu1/view?usp=drive_link

[63] The term Velalar derives from the Tamil words Vel (meaning "land" or "earth") and Alar (meaning "ruler" or "governor"), collectively signifying "one who governs the land."

Historically, the Velalars were recognized as landowners of marutha nilam (fertile agricultural land), one of the five classifications of land prescribed in Sangam literature. During the Pallava dynasty's reign, several warrior and agrarian communities—including the Kallars, Maravars, and Agamudayars (collectively known as Thevars)—were administratively consolidated under the broader designation of Velalars.

This sociocultural classification reflects the community's historical prominence in land stewardship and regional governance. The Velalar identity thus carries both agricultural and administrative significance, rooted in ancient Tamil traditions.

https://nithyanandapedia.org/wiki/1978_-_Thondaimandala_Shaiva_Velalar_Community

[64] Bhargava, R. P. (1991), The Chamber of Princes, Northern Book Centre, pp. 312–323, ISBN 978-81-7211-005-5

[65] (i) Dr. Henry Soszynski - Study of Orissa estates during the 19th century http://members.iinet.net.au/~royalty/ips/misc/orissa_estates.html, research showing that Surangi was recognised as an independent princely state by the British Government ruled by the “Raja” (KING) (ii) https://www.indianrajputs.com/view/surangi

[66] The template "Instrument of Accession" mentioned, "Nothing in this Instrument affects the continuance of my sovereignty in and over this State, or, save as provided by or under this Instrument, the exercise of any powers, authority and rights now enjoyed by me as Ruler of this state or the validity of any law at present in force in this State." White Paper of Indian States (1950) Ministry of States, Government of India, Instrument of Accession, Appendix VII, point 8, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/White_Paper_on_Indian_States_(1950)/Part_4/Instrument_of_Accession

[67] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_Purse_in_India

[68] The privy purse itself was unilaterally abolished by the Indian Government, invoking the conditions of fraud (article 49 VCLT) and that of "termination or suspension of the operation of a treaty as a consequence of its breach" (article 60) of the VCLT.

[69] The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) 1969 clearly states as grounds for invalidity of a treaty to include: Restrictions on authority to express the consent of a State (article 49 VCLT); Corruption of a representative of a State (article 50 VCLT); Coercion of a State by the threat or use of force.

https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf

[70] Article 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text ; The International Law Commission (ILC) https://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/1_14.shtml ; Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf ; The Hague Regulations and Geneva Conventions (i) https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/hague/en/docs/hague_system_regulations.pdf, https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/adopt_ref/hague-convention-text.html

[71] Tiwari, Aaditya (30 October 2017). "Sardar Patel – Man who United India". pib.gov.in.

[72] Lumby, E. W. R. 1954. The Transfer of Power in India, 1945–1947. London: George Allen & Unwin. p. 228

[73] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_of_Accession

[74] The "Instrument of Accession" between the Hindu Kings and the Dominion of India was contrary to the Hindu law that governed these Kingdoms, as these kings were merely the stewards of the presiding Deity, having no authority to accede their kingdoms to a non-Hindu entity.

[75] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_India_Act_1935

[76] Through the 42^(nd) Amendment in 1976 in the Constitution of India, this stand was further reasserted with the addition of the word “Secular” to the Preamble of the Constitution of India, thereby further distancing India (Bharat) to its original form as a Hindu nation. This amendment, in spirit, further dissociated India (Bharat) from all religious duties and identities of a Hindu Kingdom, unlike how it always was during its history of more than 10,000 years.

[77] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India)

[78] Surya Vamsa Surangi Samrajya Sarvajnapeetha, Suvarnapeetha Swargapura Samrajya Sarvajnapeetha, Shyamala Peetha Sarvajnapeetha

[79] In addition, Kanchi KAILASA Sarvajnapeetha and seventeen sovereign Sanatana Hindu ecclesiastical historical institutions receive customary recognition by the UN as per the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

[80] https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_1_1961.pdf

[81] Historical examples dating back to the eighteenth century include cases like Portugal and Genoa and instances of state re-establishment after the Vienna Congress of 1815. More recent examples, such as Poland, Ethiopia, Czechoslovakia, Albania, and Austria during and after World War II, serve as other modern instances of state re-establishment, offering additional evidence to recognize and preserve a state's legal personality over time.

[82] The Thondaimandalam Sannidhanam Government in Exile was established in 1947, immediately following India's partition.

This significant event occurred when India gained independence from British colonial rule but was divided into two separate countries: India and Pakistan.

During decolonization, Hindu indigenous traditions and culture were targeted, leading to concerns about preserving the indigenous enlightened civilization. In response, the Government in Exile was formed to protect and promote Hindu heritage.

In 1988, in concurrence with the 68th Jagadguru Shankaracharya of Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, the 230th Guru Mahasannidhanam of Kanchi KAILASA Thondaimandala Sarvajnapeetha formally appointed The Supreme Pontiff of Hinduism (SPH) Bhagavan Nithyananda Paramashivam as its spiritual and administrative leader, ensuring the continuation of unbroken Hindu lineages. The 68th Kanchi Shankaracharya had this vision for a long time which was revealed in his 1920 letter to the League of Nations.

The enforced disappearance of one of the Sannidhanams during decolonization highlights the challenges faced by Hindu institutions. Understanding this history informs strategies for addressing contemporary challenges and preserving Hindu traditions.

[83] The Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties (1978) (https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/3_2_1978.pdf) addresses aspects of the Doctrine of Continuity by outlining how treaty obligations are handled during state succession.

In international customary law, the 'Principle of Continuity of States' (Doctrine of Continuity) implies that upheavals and revolutions within a country, changes in government, territorial adjustments, measures taken during military occupation, or other internal transformations do not negate the existence of the country, do not affect the legal personality and international obligations of the state.

[84] The Surangi Kingdom, through unification with 20 other sovereign Hindu States and sovereign ecclesiastical, historical entities, became part of the United States KAILASA, which thus became a Sovereign independent juridical state, with SPH as the Sovereign.

[85] As per the doctrine of continuity, these facts imply that the legitimacy of KAILASA manifests as a natural outcome of historical legal facts without mandating the need for further validation, confirmation, or support from other nations.

[86] While the territory of the Surangi Kingdom was annexed unlawfully, KAILASA has no territorial conflict with the Republic of India or any other nation and does not claim any territorial rights over its erstwhile territories.

[87] Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties art. 70(1)(b), May 23, 1969, available at https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf, provides that the termination of an international treaty "does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties created through the execution of the treaty prior to its termination," and that the concerned parties created through the treaty continue to possess their respective acquired rights.

[88] For instance, the Permanent Court of International Justice held in its Advisory Opinion on the German Settlers in Poland (1923) that "Private rights acquired under existing law do not cease on a change of sovereignty." As per the United Nations International Law Commission, these statements of the Permanent Court clearly show that, in the event of a territorial change, an international obligation exists to respect the rights of private individuals acquired under the legislation previously in force.

[89] International Law Commission, Documents of the eleventh session, including the report of the Commission to the General Assembly, Fourth report on State Responsibility by Mr. F. V. Garcia-Amador, Special Rapporteur Document A/CN.4/119 on State responsibility. https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_119.pdf

[90] Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Collection of Advisory Opinions, series B, No. 6, Settlers of German Origin in Territory ceded by Germany to Poland, pp. 36 and 38. See also other statements of the Court in Collection of Judgments, series A, No. 2, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions case, p. 28, and series A, No. 7, Case concerning certain German interests in Polish Upper Silesia, pp. 22 and 42

[91] Around 1976, a case of deity theft was filed in the UK court. The suing entity was a juristic person, which was a Hindu Deity. The case involved the repatriation of a stolen Nataraja Deities to India, which had been stolen in the autumn of 1976 from the Aril Thiru Viswanatha Swamy Thanjavur district, Tamil Nadu.

The Indian Government sued Bumper Development Corporation (BDC) and the metropolitan police as co-defendants. The case was fought by a Queen's Counsel, Adrian Hamilton, assisted by the persuasive Bhaskar Ghorpade, barrister-at-law. The Indian Government argued that "once a deity, always a deity. An idol remains a juristic person however long buried or damaged, since the deity and its juristic entity survive the total destruction of its earthly form." The judge concluded that a juristic entity with a title to the Nataraja is superior to that of the defendant. The case set a precedent for regaining stolen temple Deities. It marked the first time a Hindu Deity (embodied form of God as per Hinduism) was recognized as a juristic person in a UK court.

https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/international/story/19880315-indian-government-wins-stolen-nataraja-idol-case-in-british-court-797028-1988-03-14

These case references illustrate that the Hindu Law and principles related to Deity Rights and Divine Sovereignty are recognized in Common English Law, not just in some jurisdictions. Also, given the fact that these principles are recognized in Common English Law and applied before Colonization (in Hindu kingdoms under the Hindu constitution), during the colonial era (under Common English Law), and afterward under Indian (which also upholds these principles as illustrated with different case laws), it is clear that these principles are universal and undisputed.

[92] These concepts and principles in India are primarily governed by Hindu law and various judgments by the Supreme Court and High Courts.

One of the landmark cases that dealt with Deities being juristic persons capable of owning property is the case of "Ram Jankijee Deities vs State Of Bihar & Ors (1999) 5 SCC 50". In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that Hindu idols are juristic entities and have the legal status of a minor under the guardianship of the managing trustee or priest of the temple. Implying that the Deity, as a juristic person, can own property, sue, and be sued in court. The property in question is held in trust for the Deity, and the managing trustee or the priest acts on behalf of the deity.

[93] For example, Marthanda Varma, King of Padmanabhapuram, Kingdom of Travancore, in December 1749, declared and dedicated the kingdom to the presiding Deity, Sri Padmanabha, and subsequently assumed the title Padmanabha Dasa (the servant of Lord Padmanabhan). This act is known as Thripadidanam, which meant that the kingdom became the property of Padmanabhaswamy. Since then, the kingdom's sovereign has been the temple's Deity, while the head of the royal family ruled on the Deity’s behalf as guardian and pre-eminent servant (Padmanabha Dasa). Since that day, Travancore has not belonged to any one person or the royal family but to the Lord. The kings merely ruled as vassals of agents of the Deity. Marthanda Varma’s last words to his successor, Rama Varma, were, “No deviation whatever should be made in regard to the dedication of the Kingdom to Sri Padmanabhaswamy, and all further territorial acquisitions should be made over to the Devasom.”

[94] The Executive Officers are mere servants of the Deity.

In “State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. V. Pujari Utthan Avam Kalyan Samiti & Anr”, (2021) SC 4245, AIR 2021 SC 690, (dated September 6, 2021, available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122592345/), the Supreme court ruled that the presiding Deity owns all temple property as a legal person and the name of neither the District Collector (State District Executive) nor the Pujari (priest) be put in the property ownership papers(Revenue records). Paragraph 27 of the judgment mentioned above states, “In the ownership column, the name of the deity alone is required to be mentioned as the deity, being a juristic person is the owner of the land. The occupation of the land is also by the deity, which is carried out by the servant or the managers, on behalf of the deity.” The property of the Deity cannot be used by anybody else.

[95] In Sabhanayagar Temple, Chidambaram v. State Of Tamil Nadu, (2014) 12 SCC 454 (dated January 6, 2014, available at - https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/41133.pdf), the court upholds that temple trustee cannot be non-Hindu entity; trustees or managers of a temple must be associated with the Hindu faith, as they are serving the presiding Deity.

This principle is elaborated in paragraph 19 of the judgment, which outlines that religious denomination or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) who have been recognized as having the exclusive privilege to participate in the administration, worship, and services to the Deity of the temple, and who have a right established and recognized for several centuries are the rightful trustees.

The judgment also emphasized that such religious denominations or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) functioning as trustees have an essential requirement to be associated with the Hindu faith, as they serve in a capacity that is deeply intertwined with the religious and spiritual heritage of the temple.

Similarly, the Andhra Pradesh Endowments Act 1956 (available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/16889/1/act_no_30_of_1987.pdf) states that Non-Hindus or non-believers should not be appointed as trustees or heads of Hindu temples - "19. Disqualifications for Trusteeship - (1) A person shall be disqualified for being appointed as, or for being, trustee of any charitable or religious institution or endowment - [...] (j) if he does not profess Hindu religion in the case of religious institution or endowment."

Similarly, the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, Section 10, clearly states that all personnel must be Hindus (https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/13275/1/TNHR%26CE%20ACT,%201959%20-%20revised%20and%20updated.pdf).

[96] However, the Madurai Adheenam is now governed by a non-Hindu entity which is against the Indian constitution https://www.indiatoday.in/india/tamil-nadu/story/tamil-nadu-madurai-adheenam-desiga-paramacharya-dmk-corruption-hrce-1958910-2022-06-06

[97] Just as in the Chidambaram v. State Of Tamil Nadu (2014) 12 SCC 454, the judgment emphasized that religious denominations or a section (including a community of priests, Pontiff of the temple-monastery, etc.) functioning as trustees have an essential requirement to be associated with the Hindu faith, as they serve in a capacity that is deeply intertwined with the religious and spiritual heritage of the temple, likewise, the executive officers of the system of governance, including laws and constitution, must be derived from the Hindu Jurisprudence (the VedaAgamas and Dharmashastras) and heritage, inherent laws and statutes of the Hindu nation are deeply intertwined with its religious and spiritual heritage.

[98] This fact is well understood by the application of the legal principle and international customary law, "Ex injuria jus non oritur," which translates to "Law does not arise from injustice" or, more loosely, "From wrong or unjust action, law (or a right) cannot arise”

This principle is a fundamental concept in international law. It's rooted in the idea that one cannot benefit from wrongdoing. It plays a crucial role in various aspects of international law, including the prohibition of acquiring territory by force and the illegality of agreements or actions contrary to international law. It emphasized that the illegal action (annexation of a Hindu state by threat or force) cannot create legal rights for the wrongdoer.

[99] An international entity with de facto (by fact) statehood has all the characteristics of a state and operates like one but may not be widely recognized.

An entity with de jure (by law) statehood meets the legal criteria and is widely recognized by the international community.

[100] "Juridical statehood" refers to the legal recognition of a political entity as a sovereign state under international law. It is the formal, legal recognition that it is an entity and is constitutionally independent of all foreign states, recognized as sovereign or independent by most states, enjoys membership in international organizations, and possesses various rights and obligations under international law.

[101] The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States establishes that “the political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other states”, emphasizing the inherent rights of states to self-governance, territorial integrity, and political independence.

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, Article 3, December 26, 1933. Available at: https://www.ilsa.org/Jessup/Jessup15/Montevideo%20Convention.pdf

Further, Article 13 of the 1948 Charter of the Organization of American States elucidates the independent exercise of these rights within the framework of international law.

https://www.oas.org/dil/1948%20charter%20of%20the%20organization%20of%20american%20states.pdf

[102] The three ancient Hindu sovereign states of KAILASA, namely the kingdoms of Surya Vamsa Surangi Samrajyam Sarvajnapeetham, Suvarnapeetha Swargapura Samrajya Sarvajnapeetham, Shyamala Peetha Sarvajnapeetham possessed all these characteristics at all time.

However, at various times, temporarily, the control of their territory was lost. But this did not negate the existence of KAILASA, as per the doctrine of continuity, in the international customary law, which, as mentioned before, states that the upheavals and revolutions within a country, changes in governmental forms, the extent of a country's territory, and measures taken during a military occupation do not affect the existence of the State.

[103] As a juridical state, KAILASA possesses an international legal personality, which means it can enter into treaties, join international organizations, and raise claims in international courts.

[104] The Roman Emperor Julian is noted to have received an embassy from a Pandya around 361 CE. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pandya-dynasty (ii) Trade and Trade Routes in Ancient India, by Moti Chandra, Abhinav Publications, Chapter VI - Trade between India and the Roman Empire, page 111,”From those land routes at least in the time of Augustus several Indian embassies reached Rome. At least four such embassies are mentioned in the Latin literature, namely 1) the embassy from Puru country (the territory between the Jhelum and Beas) took with it to Rome serpents, monals, tigers and a letter written in Greek language, 2) the embassy from Broach was accompanied by a Buddhist monk named Germanos, 3) an embassy from the Chera country. It was reported in Rome that at Muziris (Cranganore) was built a temple in honour of Augustus and 4) an embassy from the Pandya country brought with it precious stones, pearls and an elephant. We know that in the time of Augustus commercial relations between India and Rome grew but in this the balance of trade was in favour of India from the very beginning and as a result of this Roman gold poured into the country.” https://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/63122.pdf

[105] Such ancient history illustrates that the constituent Sovereign nations and entities of the United States of KAILASA had been well-known international legal personalities at various times, possessing both De Jure and De Facto Statehood, and with their revival as KAILASA continues to do so.

[106] Kumari Kandam is the Ancient Enlightened Sanatana Hindu Civilization, emphasizing its role in shaping cultural heritage and spiritual beliefs, thus strengthening the bond between Hindu identity and transnational ancient roots. However, the sovereign lands of its citizens were lost to the waves of the Indian Ocean when Kumari Kandam, the ancient Hindu homeland, sank beneath the surface due to the ravages of cataclysmic climate change and ecological destruction. This calamity, a stark reminder of the consequences of neglecting the delicate balance of nature, has driven the people of KAILASA to seek a new home, where they may rebuild and thrive in harmony with the environment. Later on in history, the rest of our lands were lost as an effect of colonialism, further eroding our connection to our ancestral heritage and cultural identity.

[107] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBnxEdpoZwstJqC1yZpOjRA

[108] https://www.nakkheeran.in/

[109] A morphed defamatory video of the actress Ranjitha with SPH was spread virally over the print and electronic media by the deep state controlled Sun TV. The video was analyzed and proven to be false on almost 60 technical points by 4 independent forensic experts including from the FBI, Canada, etc. In 2012 the Chief Operations Officer of Sun TV gave a television interview accepting that the channel manufactured fake news to target SPH (18 Dec 2012 - Jaya TV - Hansraj Saxena’s Statement - Jaya TV(https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/Confession_of_Sun_TV_COO_Hansraj_Saxena_on_national_television.mp4This video was removed in hours after it was telecast; the AIAT legal archives have downloaded the same for evidence and records. Later in 2014, he reiterated this statement in an affidavit to a US court (US District Court, Central District of California, Case 5:13-cv-00393-VAP (SPx), document 156-3, 3 Nov 2014, Declaration of Dharmaraja Hansraj Saxena.

https://shrikailasa.github.io/persecution_evidences/Affidavit_of_Dharmaraja_Hansraj_Saxena.pdf).

Although the courts ordered in her favor restraining the misinformation (W.P. 8619/2011, WP 7767/2010, 14/527/10-11-PCI, 2 Sept 2013 BCCC Order, NBSA #32/2014, etc.) and telecast of fabricated deep-fake videos, the media kept pushing the implementation of the order to various quasi-legal institutions (self-regulatory bodies run by the media itself). Finally, the media self-regulatory quasi-legal body, the NBSA ordered its member channels to remove fabricated defamatory videos from their websites (News Broadcasting Standards Authority Order No. 32 (2014) dated 27 Aug 2014, found Zee TV and Aaj Tak in contempt of court), and were ordered to apologize and also delete all similar videos from their websites also (refer point - 6 of the same order). http://www.nbanewdelhi.com/assets/uploads/pdf/2014_12_ORDER_NO_32_DT__27_8_14.pdf ). None of the media houses complied with the order and kept reuploading, re-telecasting the same footage, and continue the misinformation propaganda to date.

[110] WP 7767/2010 http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgments/bitstream/123456789/427478/1/WP7767-10-12-08-2010.pdf

[111] WP 7767/2010 http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgments/bitstream/123456789/427478/1/WP7767-10-12-08-2010.pdf

[112] https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media, https://nithyanandapedia.org/

[113] Then known as Ranjitha, Ma Nithyananda Mayi Swami, was a well-known Indian actress with over 18 years in the film and television industry. She made her Tamil film debut in 1992 and went on to act in over 60 films across all four South Indian languages. Notably, she received the Andhra Pradesh Government Nandi Award in 1996 and was recognized as the heroine with the most movie releases for two consecutive years in Tamil cinema.

[114] https://media.un.org/en/asset/k17/k17v2c8hr2

[115] https://www.ohchr.org/en/events/events/2023/day-general-discussion-general-comment-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-and

[116] https://kailaasa.org/featured/the-united-states-of-kailasa-enters-into-bilateral-relations-with-cities-of-the-republic-of-paraguay/

[117] This denial of KAILASA's existence as a sovereign nation not only undermines its purpose and necessity but also deprives Hindus of their fundamental right to self-determination.

[118] In a victory for Hindus, several articles delegitimizing and defaming KAILASA and SPH have been removed, including by the Washington Post.

https://kailaasa.org/briefings-statements/major-success-130-hindumisic-articles-n-deepfake-videos-already-removed-20-more-today/

[119] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1rdmintiugyCBdqG3BfQ3G8fzNc3Js8Lw

[120] Such as El Deber and Ana Bolivia as well as India outlets like Times Now, TV9, Zee Tamil news, News Minute and Republic World

[121] https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media, https://nithyanandatruth.org/

[122] Reports on Jagadish "Jaggi" Vasudev’s (Satguru) attempt to kill SPH https://www.gurumag.com/inside-sadhgurus-cult-empire/, https://www.youtube.com/live/uLFpZBpGj1A

[123] https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/tree/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusation

[124] https://kailaasa.org/briefings-statements/key-conspirators-behind-deepfake-video-arrested-sridhar-now-jailed-interstate-nbw-issued-for-lenin/

[125] https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/116.-Samaya_Judgmentonly-1.pdf

[126] https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Judgment1.pdf

https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ohio-Order.pdf

[127] https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/04.-attachment_Lencioni-Email.pdf

[128] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1FDLLqGfXhjxc9k3eime2-DlozQOvnb0u

[129] https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ex.-M-Rao-Bench-Warrant-11.20.13-copy_Redacted-copy.pdf

https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ex.-P-Rao-10.9.14-Motion-for-Contempt-Certified-Order3.pdf

https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AR-DS1-2-Rao-Bench-Warrant-10.20.14-1pg.pdf

[130] https://kailaasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/RAO_MTS_FinalOrder_JudgeBarkley_April18-2012.pdf

[131] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k13qxtAD7jRNd7iyejU41mp8An0hibeE/view?usp=share_link

[132] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ablp13MZmXaWgn82LRkgGmKEmHWtPSsU/view?usp=share_link

[133] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PYP-kJ7bUe9SbqS9gUPMfs4SLuM8swPY/view?usp=share_link

[134] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PY0zQ2_-yyde9RkTBrdP5IMk8fr869tn/view?usp=share_link

[135] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rKo1wVt1f8c8f9_AD8YroaqpteTO1Sk-/view?usp=share_link

[136] Specialists in Human Rights and Human Mobility

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1zez1O8F9a64G7LFohj-eGf8kTS9J4Y5J

[137] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1xGcOHll7AeXdrLyQR2mzvoDNLOoxNlF8

[138] Mission Scalabriniana (MSC) is part of the Congregation of Missionary Sisters of St. Charles Borromeo - Scalabrinianas, an organization founded in Piacenza, Italy, by Monserat Juan Bautista Scalabrini, in the year 1895. Its mission is to welcome, promote, protect and integrate migrant and refugee populations. It is present in 27 countries.

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1CX7izIoKQiKyjv_PONRpLuyfhmE24IIw

[139] Professor at the Andean University Simón https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1fvALF1OFAzAKHq4_SXDrYZ643OjOA2sm

[140] https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/tree/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusation/expert%20opinion%20by%20medical%20experts

[141] https://github.com/kailaasa/docs-for-media/blob/main/exoneration%20in%20false%20rape%20accusation/Top%2010%20false%20claims%20of%20false%20rape%20accuser%20with%20datewise%20proofs%20of%20contradictions%20proving%20his%20innocence.pdf

[142] https://drive.google.com/file/d/172z8MPD1_-foQR7wqKta9Yd4gdukAfF3/view?usp=sharing

[143] Articles 30.2:

In the framework of the unity of the State, and in accordance with this Constitution, the nations and rural native indigenous peoples enjoy the following rights:

To self-determination and territoriality.

To the collective ownership of land and territories.

To the practice of their political, juridical and economic systems in accord with their world view.

To autonomous indigenous territorial management, and to the exclusive use and exploitation of renewable natural resources existing in their territory without prejudice to the legitimate rights acquired by third parties.

Article 289: Rural native indigenous autonomy consists in self-government as an exercise of free determination of the nations and rural native indigenous peoples, the population of which shares territory, culture, history, languages, and their own juridical, political, social and economic organization or institutions.

[144] https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1C_PELd5F1QUqBRVKDxo8cNBJxguZR3C1

[145] Audio testimonial Ma Lok Teng Lung (Guruprasadini):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/12qqSKfvwezLsk-LGxLMN39KL4OZ4-QqR/view?usp=drive_link

Evidence of abduction from their residence and illegal detention at immigration

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1O8J_e5dSnuNLiZuoIZrNrPmor6XPxEZD

Abduction from La Paz international airport and dumped at the Peru-Bolivian border

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/12HeNl4RcFQTKXbb_FhD84nohqcgqxjes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVSX_fmPslc

[146] Full report and evidences: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Gc7lrsbln4jQFCSQTLDQdG3dFcvZkOaJ?usp=drive_link